Delhi High Court
73,320 judgments
QUALCOMM TECHNOLOGIES, INC v. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CIRCLE INTERNATIONAL TAX 3-1-1 & ORS.
Delhi High Court directs Income Tax Department to decide rectification application and issue refund with interest for AY 2017-18 within six weeks, correcting erroneous refund adjustments.
Interglobe Technology Quotient Pvt Ltd v. Shree Sati Travels Pvt Ltd
The Delhi High Court appointed a sole arbitrator under Section 11(4) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 after the respondent failed to consent, reaffirming that unilateral appointment by one party is invalid per Supreme Court precedent.
Arun Kumar v. Govt. of NCT of Delhi & Ors.
The Delhi High Court set aside the Tribunal's order dismissing the petitioner's challenge to cancellation of his police recruitment candidature for lack of reasons and remanded the matter for fresh consideration.
M/S WEARWELL (INDIA) PRIVATE LIMITED v. RAJU
The Delhi High Court held that a valid out-of-court settlement under Section 18(1) of the Industrial Disputes Act is binding even without court confirmation and ordered refund of pre-deposit amounts withheld by the Appellate Court.
Sandeep Kumar v. Union of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petitioner’s third writ petition challenging termination of service as barred by public policy for being filed without leave after earlier petitions were withdrawn or dismissed.
JMC Projects (India) Ltd. v. National Highways Authority of India
The Delhi High Court upheld the mandatory requirement of security clearance for foreign joint ventures in government tenders but directed expeditious reconsideration to balance procedural compliance with public interest in timely project execution.
Sanvik Engineers India Pvt. Ltd & Anr. v. Government of National Capital Territory of Delhi & Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that once land is urbanized by notification under the DMC or DDA Acts, the Delhi Land Reforms Act ceases to apply, but pending proceedings initiated before urbanization may continue to their conclusion.
QUALCOMM TECHNOLOGIES, INC v. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CIRCLE INTERNATIONAL TAX 3-1-1 & ORS.
The Delhi High Court disposed of Qualcomm's writ petition directing the tax authorities to deposit the refund with interest within six weeks following the appeal effect order.
M/S WEARWELL (INDIA) PRIVATE LIMITED v. PRAVEEN KUMAR
The Delhi High Court held that a valid settlement under Section 18(1) of the Industrial Disputes Act is binding even without court confirmation and ordered refund of pre-deposit paid in appeal under the Payment of Wages Act.
Deepak @ Deepu v. State NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court upheld the murder convictions of four appellants based on reliable eyewitness testimony, corroborated circumstantial evidence including call data records, and rejected challenges to the prosecution’s case, while setting aside acquittals under the Arms Act.
QUALCOMM TECHNOLOGIES, INC v. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CIRCLE INTERNATIONAL TAX 3-1-1 & ORS.
The Delhi High Court directed the Income Tax authorities to comply with ITAT orders and issue refunds with interest to Qualcomm Technologies for AY 2015-16 and 2016-17 within six weeks.
COMMUNICATION COMPONENTS ANTENNA INC v. MOBI ANTENNA TECHNOLOGIES (SHENZHEN) CO. LTD
The Delhi High Court held that revocation of a patent under Sections 64(1)(h) and (k) of the Patents Act requires specific pleadings and evidence and cannot be decided as a pure question of law based solely on patent specifications.
GURKIRPAL SINGH v. BSES RAJDHANI POWER LIMITED
The Delhi High Court held that a tenant protected under the Delhi Rent Control Act is entitled to an independent electricity connection without requiring a No Objection Certificate from the landlord, subject to compliance with formalities.
Naresh Kher v. S Jagjit Singh & Ors.
The Delhi High Court allowed an execution first appeal challenging a decree obtained by fraud involving multiple sales of the same property, setting aside the execution order and directing interim measures to protect the property pending final adjudication.
Google Asia Pacific Pte Ltd v. Commissioner of Income Tax & Anr.
The Delhi High Court held that the 10% withholding tax rate under the DTAA is inclusive of surcharge and cess and granted interim relief permitting 8% tax deduction to avoid double taxation on payments to Google Asia Pacific.
Deepanshu Khanna & Anr. v. University of Delhi
Delhi High Court directed University of Delhi to fill all vacant LLB seats after cut-off date due to extended deadlines and failure to cancel ineligible admissions, emphasizing equity and transparency.
Deepanshu Khanna & Anr. v. University of Delhi
The Delhi High Court directed the University of Delhi to fill all vacant LLB seats after the cut-off date, emphasizing flexibility in admission timelines due to COVID-19 and the duty to maximize educational opportunities.
Principal Commissioner of Income Tax Central-3 v. Alchemist Life Sciences Ltd
Delhi High Court upheld that additions under Section 153A cannot be made without seized materials when assessments have attained finality prior to search.
Asian Colour Coated Ispat Limited v. Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax & Anr.
The Delhi High Court directed income tax authorities to decide jurisdictional objections before proceeding with assessments for pre-resolution years, recognizing extinguishment of liabilities upon insolvency resolution plan approval.
Dr. Priya Narula v. Dy. Commissioner of Income Tax Circle International Taxation 2 (2)(2) & Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that recovery of disputed tax demand exceeding 20% without specific reasons violates Income Tax rules and directed refund of excess amount adjusted from the petitioner’s refunds.