Delhi High Court
73,320 judgments
Mahesh v. State (Govt of NCT of Delhi)
The Delhi High Court granted bail to the petitioner accused of possessing commercial quantity of Ecstasy under the NDPS Act, emphasizing reasonable grounds, parity with co-accused, and the right to speedy trial.
Priyaranjan Sharma v. State of NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court dismissed bail under Section 37 of the NDPS Act for an accused involved in commercial quantity Charas trafficking, emphasizing stringent bail conditions and the accused's connection to the drug cartel.
Airports Authority of India v. Air Traffic Safety Electronics Personnel Association (India) & Anr.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the appeal against an interim order and directed expeditious hearing of the writ petition, emphasizing avoidance of multiplicity of proceedings.
Jagmit Singh v. Sonia Singh
The High Court upheld interim maintenance of Rs. 1,00,000 per month under the DV Act but set aside an additional Rs. 35,000 for alternate accommodation due to lack of reasons, emphasizing limited revisional jurisdiction under Section 482 Cr.P.C.
M/S Garg Builders v. Sidculconcor Infra Company Limited
The Delhi High Court appointed a sole arbitrator to adjudicate disputed contractual claims after the petitioner complied with arbitration invocation procedures under the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.
Nancy Gill v. State
The Delhi High Court granted regular bail to the accused in a cheating case under Section 420 IPC, balancing the right to speedy trial with the seriousness of the offence by imposing stringent bail conditions.
The Chief Manager Punjab and Sind Bank v. Shri Paramjit Singh Nanda
Delhi High Court upheld compulsory retirement of bank employee for forgery and fabrication of documents, setting aside CGIT award of reinstatement and back wages.
Bright Shine Services v. Union of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition challenging the tender award to Respondent No. 5, holding that the tendering authority acted fairly and within its discretion in accepting bids after clarifications and issuing No Dues Certificates.
USV Private Limited v. Pure and Cure Healthcare Pvt. Ltd and Anr.
The Delhi High Court granted permanent injunction against the defendant for infringing the plaintiff's registered trademark "D-RISE" and imitating its trade dress, restraining use of the mark "D WISE" and ordering delivery up of infringing goods.
Ajay v. Employees State Insurance Corporation & Anr.
The Delhi High Court upheld the ESIC’s fixation of 10 April 2024 as the cut-off date for age eligibility for Ward of IP reservation in NEET UG 2024 admissions, dismissing the petitioner’s challenge as lacking arbitrariness or illegality.
Prerna Enterprises v. Commissioner of Delhi Goods and Services Tax & Anr.
The Delhi High Court directed the tax authorities to decide the petitioner's delayed GST refund application within three weeks, emphasizing mandatory statutory timelines under the CGST Act.
Punit Beriwala v. Bhai Manjit Singh HUF & Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that a suit for specific performance based on an oral agreement to sell immovable property is maintainable if the plaint discloses a cause of action and readiness to perform, and rejected the defendants' plea for dismissal under Order VII Rule 11 CPC.
GIANI S FOODS PRIVATE LIMITED v. MR. KESHAV AGGARWAL, TRADING AS M/S. KESHAV FOODS & ANR.
The Delhi High Court disposed of a trademark infringement suit by decree in terms of a mediation settlement and directed refund of the entire court fee to the plaintiff.
Gaurav Mendiratta v. Narcotics Control Bureau
The Delhi High Court granted bail to the petitioner in an NDPS case, holding that weak and inadmissible evidence and absence of direct recovery justify bail despite stringent provisions under Section 37 of the NDPS Act.
PR Commissioner of Income Tax Central II v. M/S Sharp Mint Limited
The Delhi High Court dismissed the Revenue's appeal, holding that Section 153A of the Income Tax Act does not permit reassessment of completed assessments in absence of incriminating material found during search.
Vijay Kumar v. Union of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court directed the CRPF authority to consider and decide the petitioner's representation for release of increments withheld as punishment after completion of the penalty period.
Vijay Kumar Yadav & Ors. v. Union of India & Anr.
The Delhi High Court held that FCI cannot deploy contract labour in depots notified under Section 10 of the CLRA Act and quashed the tender notice attempting such deployment, while permitting lawful employee transfers.
D.B. Mathur v. Punjab National Bank
The Delhi High Court dismissed the writ petition holding that pay fixation on re-employment cannot exceed last pay drawn and that the benefit of including pre-commissioned training increments was valid only until withdrawn by a subsequent circular.
Merino Industries Limited v. Shri Mayank Bansal
The Delhi High Court appointed a sole arbitrator under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 to adjudicate disputes arising from a confidentiality and non-compete agreement between Merino Industries Limited and its former employee.
Sunil Bansilal Raisoni & Anr. v. Bajaj Finserv/Bajaj Finance Limited & Anr.
The Delhi High Court appointed a sole arbitrator under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 to adjudicate disputes arising from a loan agreement involving pledged shares sold below market value.