Delhi High Court
73,320 judgments
Roger Shashoua & Others v. Mukesh Sharma & Others
The Delhi High Court held that upon death of a party who had transferred his shares and rights prior to arbitral awards, his legal heirs need not be impleaded as the right to sue survives in the transferee petitioners, allowing deletion of the deceased party from the proceedings.
Abha George & Ors. v. All India Institute of Medical Sciences (AIIMS) & Anr.
The Delhi High Court held that AIIMS cannot cancel admissions mid-term of candidates admitted despite delayed results beyond the cutoff date, as the institution's error cannot prejudice the students who acted in good faith.
Roger Shashoua & Others v. Mukesh Sharma & Others
The Delhi High Court held that upon death of a party who had transferred his shares and rights to nominee companies, impleadment of his legal heirs is not required for enforcement of foreign arbitral awards, and the deceased party can be deleted from the proceedings.
Hunch Circle Private Limited v. Futuretimes Technology India Pvt Ltd
The Delhi High Court dismissed Section 11 petitions for appointment of arbitrator due to lack of territorial jurisdiction, holding that exclusive jurisdiction clauses prevail over the seat of arbitration for such petitions.
Seetha Kumari v. Bajaj Finance Limited
The Delhi High Court appointed an independent arbitrator under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 to adjudicate borrower-lender disputes where the respondent failed to appoint one despite arbitration clause in the loan agreement.
Delhi Development Authority v. Sunil Kumar
The Delhi High Court held that respondents' possession cannot be disturbed until proceedings under Section 74(4) of the Delhi Land Reforms Act attain finality, dismissing the appellant's appeal.
Oil Industry Development Board v. Godrej and Boyce Mfg Co Ltd
The Delhi High Court appointed a substitute sole arbitrator under Section 11(4)(a) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 after the original arbitrator recused himself, allowing continuation of arbitration proceedings to adjudicate disputes including counterclaims.
M/S INCRED FINANCIAL SERVICES LTD. v. M/S SHREE KAMAKSHI MOTORS & ORS.
The Delhi High Court appointed an independent arbitrator under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 to adjudicate loan-related disputes where parties failed to agree on arbitrator appointment.
Prakash v. State (Govt. of NCT of Delhi) & Anr
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition to quash a rape FIR on the basis of compromise, holding that offences under Section 376 IPC are non-compoundable and cannot be quashed despite settlement between parties.
Punjab National Bank v. Pinky Deshwal
The Delhi High Court dismissed Punjab National Bank’s writ petition challenging the Armed Forces Tribunal’s orders staying recovery of excess payments and releasing the lien on the respondent’s Fixed Deposit Receipt, holding that the withdrawal of the earlier circular affected the petitioner’s recovery rights.
M/S MBL INFRASTRUCTURES LIMITED v. PRADEEP COLONISERS AND SUPPLIERS PVT LTD
The Delhi High Court appointed a sole arbitrator under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 to adjudicate contractual disputes after parties failed to agree on an arbitrator.
Yamuna Bank Kishan Bachao Morcha v. State of NCT of Delhi & Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the writ petition of farmers claiming possession of Yamuna floodplain land, upholding eviction orders under the Public Premises Act and NGT directions, and held that the petitioners are unauthorized occupants without legal title.
Yogita Yadav v. Union of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that a Review Medical Board is discretionary and refused to interfere with the Armed Forces Medical Boards' unanimous decision declaring the petitioner medically unfit for admission to the Military Nurse Service.
Sanjeev Ghei v. Union of India and Another
The Delhi High Court held that the Central Administrative Tribunal must decide afresh whether disciplinary proceedings can continue against a petitioner after compulsory retirement, and declined to interfere with the earlier order passed while the petitioner was in service.
R. Nehru v. Chinmaya Vidhyalaya Senior Secondary School and Ors.
The Delhi High Court recognized the petitioner's long-term service with the Management despite contractor employment and awarded compensation and statutory dues to his legal heirs, setting aside the Labour Court's dismissal.
Sandeep Soni v. Sanjay Roy and Others
The Delhi High Court set aside an arbitral award holding that a Will's absolute bequest to the testator's wife prevails over subsequent inconsistent clauses limiting her interest to a life estate.
Ravi Kumar @ Amit v. The State (NCT) of Delhi
The Delhi High Court granted bail to the petitioner accused of offences in a mob violence case, holding that mere presence in an unlawful assembly does not automatically justify denial of bail without prima facie evidence of active participation.
Shri Arun Kumar @ Arun Kumar Malik v. State
The Delhi High Court granted bail to a petitioner accused of offences under Sections 147, 148, 149, 302 IPC, holding that mere presence in an unlawful assembly with a weapon is insufficient to deny bail without clear evidence of active participation.
Saurabh Kalia and Others v. The Institute of Company Secretaries of India and Others
The Delhi High Court upheld the validity of the December 26, 2021 NIRC meeting and election of office bearers, ruling that the meeting complied with statutory regulations and the President of ICSI had authority to adjudicate election disputes.
TATA CAPITAL FINANCIAL SERVICES LTD. v. M/S FOCUS IMAGING RESEARCH CENTRE PVT. LTD.
The Delhi High Court appointed an independent arbitrator under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 to adjudicate loan repayment disputes between Tata Capital and Focus Imaging Research Centre.