Delhi High Court

58,736 judgments

Year:

Narender Kumar v. Directorate General of GST Intelligence Delhi Zonal Unit

08 Oct 2025 · Neena Bansal Krishna · 2025:DHC:8914

The Delhi High Court granted regular bail to the petitioner in a CGST Act offence after investigation completion, emphasizing procedural compliance and absence of extraordinary circumstances.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant bail CGST Act Section 132 Input Tax Credit

Vishal @ Paiwala v. The State

08 Oct 2025 · Neena Bansal Krishna · 2025:DHC:8909

The Delhi High Court dismissed the bail application of Vishal @ Paiwala in a murder case, holding that the gravity of offence, prima facie evidence, and absconding conduct outweigh the petitioner’s limited role and voluntary surrender.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant bail regular bail murder common intention

Asif alias Lulu v. The State of the NCT of Delhi

08 Oct 2025 · Neena Bansal Krishna · 2025:DHC:8905

The Delhi High Court dismissed the petitioner’s bail application in a serious sexual assault case against a minor, emphasizing the gravity of the offence and advanced trial stage despite contradictions and DNA evidence.

criminal appeal_dismissed bail POCSO Act sexual assault minor victim

Shri Rahul Kumar & Ors. v. The State (NCT of Delhi) & Anr.

08 Oct 2025 · Ravinder Dudeja · 2025:DHC:8916
Cites 0 · Cited by 1

The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 498A, 406, and 34 IPC based on an amicable settlement between estranged spouses, exercising its inherent powers under Section 482 CrPC to prevent abuse of process.

criminal petition_allowed Significant quashing of FIR Section 482 CrPC matrimonial dispute amicable settlement

M S RST Semiconductors Private Ltd v. Bharat Sanchar Nigam Ltd BSNL

08 Oct 2025 · Devendra Kumar Upadhyaya; Tushar Rao Gedela · 2025:DHC:8896-DB
Cites 0 · Cited by 5

The Delhi High Court upheld the respondent's right to cancel the tender process without assigning reasons, dismissing the petition challenging the annulment despite the petitioner being declared techno-commercially eligible.

administrative petition_dismissed Significant tender cancellation annulment of tender Article 226 contract award

Mohammad Asif v. State (N.C.T. of Delhi) & Anr.

08 Oct 2025 · Ravinder Dudeja · 2025:DHC:8930

The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 498A, 406, and 34 IPC based on an amicable settlement and resumption of cohabitation between the parties, exercising its inherent powers under Section 482 CrPC.

criminal petition_allowed Significant Section 482 CrPC quashing of FIR matrimonial dispute Section 498A IPC

Hansraj Goswami v. Municipal Corporation of Delhi

08 Oct 2025 · Devender Kumar Upadhyay, CJ; Tushar Rao Gedela, J · 2025:DHC:8891-DB

The Delhi High Court dismissed the appeal challenging refusal of property mutation by MCD, holding that disputed title and possession issues require civil adjudication and are not amenable to writ jurisdiction.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant mutation of property disputed title possession writ petition

Sanjay Raghunath Piplani v. Mudit Bhatnagar GM NBCC

08 Oct 2025 · Devendra Kumar Upadhyaya, CJ; Tushar Rao Gedela, J · 2025:DHC:8892-DB

The Delhi High Court dismissed the appellant's appeal seeking alternate accommodation after ordering refund with interest and compensation for defective housing, emphasizing finality in real estate dispute resolution.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant refund of sale consideration alternate accommodation interest on refund housing project defects

Lomash Slurry Tech Private Limited v. Union of India

08 Oct 2025 · Devender Kumar Upadhyay; Tushar Rao Gedela · 2025:DHC:8893-DB

The Delhi High Court upheld NHAI’s rejection of the petitioner’s bid for failing to submit Work Experience Certificates issued by the Principal Employer or approved subcontractor nomination as required under the tender conditions.

administrative petition_dismissed Significant technical evaluation Work Experience Certificate Prime Contractor nominated subcontractor

H S Banka v. Mohan Lal

08 Oct 2025 · Saurabh Banerjee · 2025:DHC:8875

The Delhi High Court held that a landlord seeking eviction under Section 14(1)(e) of the Delhi Rent Control Act need not disclose the precise nature of the business intended, and allowed eviction on bona fide requirement grounds despite tenant's challenge based on vagueness.

property appeal_allowed Significant bona fide requirement eviction petition Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958 Section 14(1)(e)

Sheeraj Projects Private Limited v. National Highways Authority of India

08 Oct 2025 · Devender Kumar Upadhyay, CJ; Tushar Rao Gedela, J · 2025:DHC:8895-DB

The Delhi High Court held that NHAI's cancellation of the Letter of Acceptance and invocation of Bid Security without following tender procedures and disregarding ICC Rules governing foreign bank guarantees was arbitrary and quashed the impugned actions.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant Letter of Acceptance Additional Performance Security Bank Guarantee International Competitive Bidding

Vijay Kumar v. Madhu Rani

08 Oct 2025 · Saurabh Banerjee · 2025:DHC:8897

The Delhi High Court upheld eviction of a tenant under the DRC Act, ruling that the five-year limitation for eviction petitions runs from the earliest landlord acquisition and that defenses not raised before the Rent Controller cannot be raised in revision.

property appeal_dismissed Significant Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958 Section 14(1)(e) Section 14(6) eviction petition

Ramesh Sharma v. Government of N.C.T. of Delhi & Ors.

08 Oct 2025 · Anil Ksheterpal; Harish Vaidyanathan Shankar · 2025:DHC:8835-DB

The Delhi High Court held that relinquishment deeds executed by co-owners in favour of another co-owner are release deeds and not gift deeds for stamp duty purposes, setting aside their impounding for deficient stamp duty.

property appeal_allowed Significant Relinquishment Deed Release Deed Gift Deed Stamp Duty

Raju v. State (GNCT of Delhi)

08 Oct 2025 · Vivek Chaudhary; Manoj Jain · 2025:DHC:8935-DB

The Delhi High Court acquitted the appellant of kidnapping and sexual assault charges under POCSO and IPC, holding that the victim was major at the time of the alleged offence based on bone age ossification test and that the prosecution failed to prove kidnapping beyond reasonable doubt.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant POCSO Act age determination bone age ossification test kidnapping

Mohinder Singh v. Satish Chander Sikka

08 Oct 2025 · Saurabh Banerjee · 2025:DHC:8876
Cites 1 · Cited by 2

The Delhi High Court upheld eviction of a tenant on bona fide requirement grounds for the landlord's grandson to start a new business, rejecting tenant's challenge on ownership and alternative accommodation.

property appeal_dismissed Significant Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958 Section 14(1)(e) bona fide requirement landlord-tenant relationship

P C Jhalani & Ors. v. Jhalani Tools (India) Ltd & Ors.

08 Oct 2025 · Anil Ksheterpal; Harish Vaidyanathan Shankar · 2025:DHC:8834-DB

The Delhi High Court held that once a company’s winding up is complete and the Official Liquidator has distributed proceeds, the Company Court cannot shield personal guarantors from creditor recovery proceedings, as their liability is independent of the company’s liquidation.

corporate appeal_dismissed Significant Company Court jurisdiction winding up Official Liquidator personal guarantors

Mohinder Kumar Gandhi v. Praveen Kumar

08 Oct 2025 · Nitin Wasudeo Sambre; Anish Dayal · 2025:DHC:8843-DB

The Delhi High Court dismissed the commercial suit appeal for recovery of price of goods due to failure to prove delivery by cogent evidence, holding that invoices, ledgers, and e-way bills alone are insufficient to establish liability.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant Commercial Courts Act, 2015 Sale of Goods Act, 1930 Section 114(g) Indian Evidence Act CGST Rules 2017 Rule 138(12)

Rehan @ Gaonwala v. State NCT of Delhi

08 Oct 2025 · Ravinder Dudeja · 2025:DHC:8885

The Delhi High Court dismissed the bail application of the principal accused in a premeditated attempted murder and extortion case, emphasizing the gravity of offences, criminal antecedents, and risk of witness intimidation.

criminal petition_dismissed Significant bail attempt to murder witness intimidation prima facie case

Nafees @ Haddi v. State GNCT of Delhi

08 Oct 2025 · Ravinder Dudeja · 2025:DHC:8883

The Delhi High Court granted regular bail to the petitioner involved in a conspiracy and assault case, emphasizing limited role, parity with co-accused, and prolonged custody.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant bail principle of parity instigation prolonged custody

Ashish v. State NCT of Delhi

08 Oct 2025 · Ravinder Dudeja · 2025:DHC:8894
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court dismissed the appellant's application for suspension of sentence and bail during the pendency of appeal in a commercial quantity NDPS conviction, holding that no exceptional circumstances or fair chance of acquittal exist.

criminal petition_dismissed Significant suspension of sentence Section 389 CrPC NDPS Act commercial quantity