Delhi High Court

29,725 judgments

Year:

H S Banka v. Mohan Lal

08 Oct 2025 · Saurabh Banerjee · 2025:DHC:8875

The Delhi High Court held that a landlord seeking eviction under Section 14(1)(e) of the Delhi Rent Control Act need not disclose the precise nature of the business intended, and allowed eviction on bona fide requirement grounds despite tenant's challenge based on vagueness.

property appeal_allowed Significant bona fide requirement eviction petition Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958 Section 14(1)(e)

Sheeraj Projects Private Limited v. National Highways Authority of India

08 Oct 2025 · Devender Kumar Upadhyay, CJ; Tushar Rao Gedela, J · 2025:DHC:8895-DB

The Delhi High Court held that NHAI's cancellation of the Letter of Acceptance and invocation of Bid Security without following tender procedures and disregarding ICC Rules governing foreign bank guarantees was arbitrary and quashed the impugned actions.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant Letter of Acceptance Additional Performance Security Bank Guarantee International Competitive Bidding

Vijay Kumar v. Madhu Rani

08 Oct 2025 · Saurabh Banerjee · 2025:DHC:8897

The Delhi High Court upheld eviction of a tenant under the DRC Act, ruling that the five-year limitation for eviction petitions runs from the earliest landlord acquisition and that defenses not raised before the Rent Controller cannot be raised in revision.

property appeal_dismissed Significant Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958 Section 14(1)(e) Section 14(6) eviction petition

Ramesh Sharma v. Government of N.C.T. of Delhi & Ors.

08 Oct 2025 · Anil Ksheterpal; Harish Vaidyanathan Shankar · 2025:DHC:8835-DB

The Delhi High Court held that relinquishment deeds executed by co-owners in favour of another co-owner are release deeds and not gift deeds for stamp duty purposes, setting aside their impounding for deficient stamp duty.

property appeal_allowed Significant Relinquishment Deed Release Deed Gift Deed Stamp Duty

Raju v. State (GNCT of Delhi)

08 Oct 2025 · Vivek Chaudhary; Manoj Jain · 2025:DHC:8935-DB

The Delhi High Court acquitted the appellant of kidnapping and sexual assault charges under POCSO and IPC, holding that the victim was major at the time of the alleged offence based on bone age ossification test and that the prosecution failed to prove kidnapping beyond reasonable doubt.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant POCSO Act age determination bone age ossification test kidnapping

Mohinder Singh v. Satish Chander Sikka

08 Oct 2025 · Saurabh Banerjee · 2025:DHC:8876
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court upheld eviction of a tenant on bona fide requirement grounds for the landlord's grandson to start a new business, rejecting tenant's challenge on ownership and alternative accommodation.

property appeal_dismissed Significant Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958 Section 14(1)(e) bona fide requirement landlord-tenant relationship

P C Jhalani & Ors. v. Jhalani Tools (India) Ltd & Ors.

08 Oct 2025 · Anil Ksheterpal; Harish Vaidyanathan Shankar · 2025:DHC:8834-DB

The Delhi High Court held that once a company’s winding up is complete and the Official Liquidator has distributed proceeds, the Company Court cannot shield personal guarantors from creditor recovery proceedings, as their liability is independent of the company’s liquidation.

corporate appeal_dismissed Significant Company Court jurisdiction winding up Official Liquidator personal guarantors

Mohinder Kumar Gandhi v. Praveen Kumar

08 Oct 2025 · Nitin Wasudeo Sambre; Anish Dayal · 2025:DHC:8843-DB

The Delhi High Court dismissed the commercial suit appeal for recovery of price of goods due to failure to prove delivery by cogent evidence, holding that invoices, ledgers, and e-way bills alone are insufficient to establish liability.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant Commercial Courts Act, 2015 Sale of Goods Act, 1930 Section 114(g) Indian Evidence Act CGST Rules 2017 Rule 138(12)

Rehan @ Gaonwala v. State NCT of Delhi

08 Oct 2025 · Ravinder Dudeja · 2025:DHC:8885

The Delhi High Court dismissed the bail application of the principal accused in a premeditated attempted murder and extortion case, emphasizing the gravity of offences, criminal antecedents, and risk of witness intimidation.

criminal petition_dismissed Significant bail attempt to murder witness intimidation prima facie case

Nafees @ Haddi v. State GNCT of Delhi

08 Oct 2025 · Ravinder Dudeja · 2025:DHC:8883

The Delhi High Court granted regular bail to the petitioner involved in a conspiracy and assault case, emphasizing limited role, parity with co-accused, and prolonged custody.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant bail principle of parity instigation prolonged custody

Ashish v. State NCT of Delhi

08 Oct 2025 · Ravinder Dudeja · 2025:DHC:8894
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court dismissed the appellant's application for suspension of sentence and bail during the pendency of appeal in a commercial quantity NDPS conviction, holding that no exceptional circumstances or fair chance of acquittal exist.

criminal petition_dismissed Significant suspension of sentence Section 389 CrPC NDPS Act commercial quantity

State NCT of Delhi v. Bhagwan Dass

08 Oct 2025 · Manoj Kumar Ohri · 2025:DHC:8915
Cites 0 · Cited by 1

The Delhi High Court upheld the acquittal of a tanker driver charged under Sections 279 and 304A IPC, emphasizing the prosecution's failure to prove rash or negligent driving beyond reasonable doubt and the double presumption of innocence in appeals against acquittal.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant Section 304A IPC rash and negligent driving motor accident double presumption of innocence

Harshit Finvest Pvt Ltd v. Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax Circle 10 1 New Delhi & Anr.

06 Oct 2025 · V. Kameswar Rao; Vinod Kumar V. Kameswar Rao · 2025:DHC:8839-DB

The Delhi High Court upheld the reopening of income tax assessment against an NBFC based on prima facie material and independent verification, dismissing the petitioner’s challenge to the validity of the proceedings.

tax petition_dismissed Significant Income Tax Act, 1961 Section 148A Reopening of assessment Prima facie belief

Juglal Ram Chander v. Surinder Pal Jain

06 Oct 2025 · Saurabh Banerjee · 2025:DHC:8999
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court upheld the eviction of a tenant on the landlord's bona fide requirement under the DRC Act, rejecting belated evidence and arguments challenging the eviction petition.

property appeal_dismissed Significant Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958 eviction petition bona fide requirement leave to defend

Shadab Khan & Anr v. Santosh & Ors

06 Oct 2025 · Tara Vitasta Ganju · 2025:DHC:9101
Cites 3 · Cited by 0

Delhi High Court enhanced compensation for death of minor child in motor accident, applying Supreme Court principles mandating calculation based on minimum wages of skilled worker and awarding conventional heads as per Pranay Sethi.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 compensation minor child death minimum wages

Sgt Ankit Kumar v. Union of India & Ors

06 Oct 2025 · C. Hari Shankar; Om Prakash Shukla · 2025:DHC:8899-DB
Cites 0 · Cited by 2

The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition challenging the transfer of an Air Force sergeant, holding that transfers in armed forces are not interfered with absent serious hardship or policy violation.

administrative petition_dismissed transfer order armed forces judicial interference medical condition

Vidhish Garer v. Union of India & Anr.

06 Oct 2025 · C. Hari Shankar; Om Prakash Shukla · 2025:DHC:8923-DB

The Delhi High Court disposed of a writ petition challenging a selection as the petitioner was subsequently selected in place of the challenged candidate, rendering the grievance resolved.

administrative petition_dismissed writ petition selection challenge grievance resolved disposal of petition

Midas Touch Metalloys Pvt. Ltd. v. FMI Limited

06 Oct 2025 · C. Hari Shankar; Om Prakash Shukla · 2025:DHC:8903-DB

The Delhi High Court dismissed the appeal as withdrawn, upheld the order refusing release of seized goods, and granted liberty to the appellant to file a fresh application after modifying the goods.

civil appeal_dismissed appeal withdrawal seized goods interlocutory application judicial discretion

Radha Kishan Joshi v. Union of India and Others

06 Oct 2025 · Navin Chawla; Madhu Jain · 2025:DHC:8980-DB

The Delhi High Court dismissed the writ petition challenging a transfer order and related consent and review orders of the CAT, holding that consent orders are binding and review applications without valid grounds are not maintainable.

administrative petition_dismissed transfer order Central Administrative Tribunal consent order review application

Shriom Dalal v. Govt. of NCT of Delhi

06 Oct 2025 · Navin Chawla; Madhu Jain · 2025:DHC:9042-DB

The Delhi High Court held that qualifying GATE was not an essential qualification for Lecturer appointment under AICTE guidelines and allowed retrospective counting of past service for CAS benefits.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant Career Advancement Scheme AICTE guidelines GATE qualification counting of past service