Delhi High Court

29,725 judgments

Year:

Baniya@Raju v. State (GNCT of Delhi)

06 Oct 2025 · Manoj Kumar Ohri · 2025:DHC:8849
Cites 4 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court upheld the conviction of the appellant for sexual offences against a child victim with mild intellectual disability, holding that credible child testimony alone suffices for conviction under POCSO despite absence of medical corroboration.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant child victim testimony POCSO Act rape intellectual disability

Rajendra Singh v. The State (Govt of NCT of Delhi)

06 Oct 2025 · Manoj Kumar Ohri · 2025:DHC:8848

The Delhi High Court upheld the conviction of a shopkeeper for sexual assault on a 7-year-old child under the POCSO Act based on credible sole testimony and medical evidence, dismissing the appellant's appeal.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant POCSO Act child sexual assault sole testimony medical evidence

Shubham Agarwal v. Union of India and Ors.

06 Oct 2025 · Navin Chawla; Madhu Jain · 2025:DHC:8847-DB

The Delhi High Court upheld the Tribunal's order directing a fresh expert medical examination to resolve a substantial discrepancy in disability assessment reports, emphasizing that the new Medical Board's report shall be final and binding.

administrative appeal_dismissed Significant Persons with Benchmark Disability Civil Services Examination Rules Appellate Disability Medical Board medical examination

Megha Engineering and Infrastructure Ltd. v. Income Tax Settlement Commission

06 Oct 2025 · V. Kameswar Rao; Vinod Kumar · 2025:DHC:8809-DB
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court held that settlement applications validly filed before the Finance Act, 2021's retrospective abolition of the Income Tax Settlement Commission must be accepted and adjudicated by the successor Interim Board, protecting taxpayers' vested rights.

tax appeal_allowed Significant Income Tax Settlement Commission Section 245-C Income Tax Act Finance Act 2021 Retrospective legislation

Sujan Mohinder Charitable Trust v. Jupinder Kaur Maker & Ajit Singh Maker

06 Oct 2025 · Purushaindra Kumar Kaurav · 2023 SCC OnLine 1395

The Delhi High Court held that an order dismissing suits as withdrawn without a formal decree under Order XXIII Rule 3 CPC is not an executable decree, and thus the execution petition based on such order is not maintainable.

civil petition_allowed Significant execution petition compromise decree withdrawal of suit Order XXIII Rule 1 CPC

ELXIR TRADING PVT. LTD v. KENT RO SYSTEMS LTD

06 Oct 2025 · C. HARI SHANKAR; OM PRAKASH SHUKLA · 2025:DHC:8836-DB

The Delhi High Court modified the order for executing commission in a design infringement suit by appointing a local Commissioner to inspect the appellant's premises under strict terms ensuring cooperation and transparency.

civil appeal_allowed Significant commission execution local Commissioner design infringement inspection and seizure

Zafaruddin Khan Faizan v. Municipal Corporation of Delhi

06 Oct 2025 · Girish Kathpalia · 2025:DHC:8832

The Delhi High Court granted interim protection against demolition of the petitioner's property due to the non-functioning of the MCD Appellate Tribunal, based on the MCD's assurance, without deciding the merits.

administrative petition_allowed Article 227 Constitution of India Appellate Tribunal MCD interim protection vacancy of Presiding Officer

M/S KCA Infrastructure & Anr. v. HDB Financial Services Limited

06 Oct 2025 · V. Kameswar Rao; Vinod Kumar · 2025:DHC:8811-DB
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court held that the designation of Chennai as the venue of arbitration did not confer exclusive jurisdiction on Chennai courts, restoring the Section 34 petition in Delhi based on the respondent's prior acquiescence to Delhi jurisdiction under Section 9 of the Arbitration Act.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Section 34 Section 42 exclusive jurisdiction

Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax – 1 v. M/s Agroha Fincap Ltd.

06 Oct 2025 · V. Kameswar Rao; Vinod Kumar · 2025:DHC:8812-DB

Delhi High Court allowed the Revenue's appeal, holding that the approval for reopening assessment under Section 151 was valid despite brief language, setting aside ITAT's quashing of reassessment proceedings.

tax appeal_allowed Significant Income Tax Act, 1961 Section 151 approval Reassessment proceedings Accommodation entries

Ashok Kumar Singh v. Union of India & Ors.

06 Oct 2025 · V. Kameswar Rao; Vinod Kumar · 2025:DHC:8810-DB

The Delhi High Court dismissed the review petition seeking backdating and regularization of promotion, holding that eligibility for promotion depends on completion of prescribed service period and no error was apparent in the original order.

administrative petition_dismissed promotion regularization Junior Time Scale Senior Time Scale Recruitment Rules

Tapas Chatterjee v. Assistant Controller of Patents and Designs & Anr.

06 Oct 2025 · C. Hari Shankar; Ajay Digpaul · 2025:DHC:8824-DB

The Delhi High Court upheld the rejection of a patent application for a process recovering potassium sulphate from distillery effluent, holding it obvious and non-patentable under Section 3(d) for lacking inventive step and new reactants or products.

intellectual_property appeal_dismissed Significant patentability inventive step Section 3(d) prior art

EX CT/GD Ajit Singh v. Union of India

06 Oct 2025 · C. Hari Shankar; Ajay Digpaul · 2025:DHC:8802-DB

The Delhi High Court held that a government servant dismissed for unauthorized absence is entitled to compassionate allowance under Rule 41 of the CCS (Pension) Rules unless misconduct involves moral turpitude or corruption.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant compassionate allowance Rule 41 CCS Pension Rules dismissal from service unauthorized absence

Rahul Tomar v. State

06 Oct 2025 · Manoj Kumar Ohri · 2025:DHC:8856

The Delhi High Court upheld the conviction for rape based on credible prosecutrix testimony corroborated by DNA evidence, dismissing the appellant's challenge on delay and defence of consensual relations.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant rape Section 376 IPC delay in reporting DNA evidence

Dharmender Kumar v. State and Anr

27 Sep 2025 · Ajay Digpaul · 2025:DHC:8741

The Delhi High Court held that once charges are framed by the trial court, the FIR cannot be quashed by writ petition under Article 226 or Section 482 CrPC, and the petitioner must challenge judicial orders through statutory remedies.

criminal petition_dismissed Significant quashing of FIR charge framing Article 226 Constitution Section 482 CrPC

Ekoh Collins Chidubem v. Narcotics Control Bureau

27 Sep 2025 · Ajay Digpaul · 2023 SCC OnLine Del 3006

The Delhi High Court dismissed bail applications of accused in a commercial heroin trafficking case, holding that statutory bail bar under Section 37 NDPS Act applies and procedural irregularities do not vitiate prosecution.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant bail NDPS Act commercial quantity Section 37 NDPS

Pinki v. The State of NCT of Delhi; Ayush Bhedda v. The State Govt. of NCT of Delhi

27 Sep 2025 · Ravinder Dudeja

The Delhi High Court granted anticipatory bail to petitioners accused of cheating and forgery in a partnership dispute, holding that custodial interrogation was unnecessary given pending arbitration and cooperation with investigation.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant anticipatory bail partnership dispute cheating forgery

Tara Dutt v. State

26 Sep 2025 · Neena Bansal Krishna · 2025:DHC:9422

The Delhi High Court upheld the conviction of Tara Dutt for abetment of bribery under Section 12 PC Act but acquitted co-accused Mukul Kumar and Ramesh Kumar due to insufficient evidence of conspiracy or abetment.

criminal appeal_partly_allowed Significant Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 Section 12 PC Act Section 120B IPC Criminal conspiracy

State of NCT of Delhi v. Tauhid Khan; Ashhab Khan; Mohd. Tabrez

26 Sep 2025 · Neena Bansal Krishna · 2025:DHC:9334
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court upheld the acquittal of accused in a narcotics case due to procedural lapses, inadmissible electronic evidence, and lack of independent witnesses, emphasizing strict compliance with NDPS Act safeguards.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant NDPS Act secret information Section 42 NDPS Act Section 65B Evidence Act

MS PLASTICOTES INVESTMENTS PRIVATE LIMITED v. DIRECTOR GENERAL OF FOREIGN TRADE & ORS

26 Sep 2025 · Sachin Datta · 2025:DHC:9044

The Delhi High Court directed DGFT to review and rationalize the eligibility criteria and allocation process for gold import TRQs under India-UAE CEPA, ensuring fairness, transparency, and adherence to natural justice.

administrative appeal_dismissed Significant Tariff Rate Quota Comprehensive Economic Partnership Agreement Directorate General of Foreign Trade Eligibility Criteria

North Delhi Municipal Corporation v. Workmen

26 Sep 2025 · Subramonium Prasad; Vimal Kumar Yadav · 2025:DHC:9026-DB

The Delhi High Court dismissed NDMC's appeal against the unreasoned order refusing restoration of a writ petition dismissed in default after an inordinate delay without sufficient cause, emphasizing strict adherence to limitation laws.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant restoration of writ petition condonation of delay limitation period Section 5 Limitation Act