Delhi High Court

58,736 judgments

Year:

Sushil Sharma v. Commissioner of Customs [Export]

06 Oct 2025 · Prathiba M. Singh; Shail Jain · 2025:DHC:8887-DB
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court upheld penalties on Customs House Agent employees for failing to prevent illegal importation of contraband cigarettes, affirming their supervisory liability under the Customs Act, 1962.

administrative appeal_dismissed Significant Customs Act, 1962 Custom House Agent Penalty under Section 112 Illegal importation

Brijesh Kumar and Others v. Union of India and Others

06 Oct 2025 · C. Hari Shankar; Om Prakash Shukla · 2025:DHC:8922-DB
Cites 0 · Cited by 2

The Delhi High Court allowed withdrawal of a writ petition seeking ante-dated seniority due to non-impleadment of affected parties, granting liberty to refile after proper impleadment.

administrative other writ petition ante-dated seniority impleadment procedural defect

Medical Council of India v. Dr. Meenakshi Gautham & Anr.

06 Oct 2025 · Nitin Wasudeo Sambre; Anish Dayal · 2025:DHC:8842-DB
Cites 0 · Cited by 1

The Delhi High Court held that an appeal under Section 19(1) of the Contempt of Courts Act is maintainable only against orders imposing punishment for contempt, dismissing the Medical Council of India's appeal as premature and not maintainable.

administrative appeal_dismissed Significant Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 Section 19(1) appeal maintainability jurisdiction to punish for contempt

M/S SPMS Abrasive v. Union of India & Ors.

06 Oct 2025 · Prathiba M. Singh; Shail Jain · 2025:DHC:8872-DB

The Delhi High Court set aside an ex-parte GST adjudication order for lack of hearing and remanded the matter for fresh adjudication, leaving the validity of related GST notifications open pending Supreme Court decision.

tax appeal_allowed Significant Goods and Services Tax Section 168A Show Cause Notice Natural Justice

Union of India v. GP Capt Kamlesh Prasad Gupta Retd

06 Oct 2025 · C. Hari Shankar; Om Prakash Shukla · 2025:DHC:8869-DB
Cites 3 · Cited by 0

The High Court upheld the Armed Forces Tribunal’s grant of disability pension for Diabetes Mellitus Type-II, affirming the presumption that disabilities arising during service are service-connected unless the employer proves otherwise, and limited its writ jurisdiction to errors of law apparent on the record.

administrative petition_dismissed Significant disability pension armed forces Diabetes Mellitus Type-II presumption of sound health

Union of India v. Ex HFO Rishi Kumar Tangar

06 Oct 2025 · C. Hari Shankar; Om Prakash Shukla · 2025 SCC OnLine Del 2355
Cites 3 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court dismissed the Union of India's petition and upheld the Armed Forces Tribunal's grant of disability pension for Primary Hypertension, affirming the presumption that disabilities not recorded at entry are attributable to military service and limiting the scope of certiorari review.

administrative petition_dismissed Significant disability pension Primary Hypertension Armed Forces Tribunal Release Medical Board

Mahila Constable M/Ct. GD Pankaj Kumari v. Union of India

06 Oct 2025 · C. Hari Shankar; Om Prakash Shukla · 2025:DHC:8870-DB

The High Court disposed of a writ petition as withdrawn after the petitioner’s transfer rendered the grievance non-surviving.

administrative petition_dismissed writ petition service grievance transfer infructuous petition

Union of India and Ors. v. Ex Sea I UW Anil Kumar

06 Oct 2025 · C. Hari Shankar; Om Prakash Shukla · 2025 SCC OnLine SC 895
Cites 3 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court dismissed the Union of India's petition and upheld the Armed Forces Tribunal's grant of disability pension for seizure disorder, affirming the presumption that disability not noted at entry is attributable to service unless disproved by the employer.

administrative petition_dismissed Significant disability pension armed forces seizure disorder certiorari jurisdiction

M/S Nohar Chand Loha Bhandar & Ors. v. M/S Shri Bajrang Power and Ispat Ltd

06 Oct 2025 · C. Hari Shankar; Om Prakash Shukla · 2025:DHC:8871-DB

The High Court set aside an ex parte interim order and directed a fair hearing with procedural safeguards before the learned Commercial Court on the application under Order XXXIX Rules 1 and 2 CPC.

civil appeal_allowed Procedural Order XXXIX Rules 1 and 2 CPC interim injunction ex parte order procedural fairness

Daulat Ram Dharam Bir Auto Pvt Ltd and Ors v. Pivotal Infrastructure Pvt Ltd and Ors

06 Oct 2025 · Jyoti Singh · 2025:DHC:8825
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court upheld the arbitrator’s dismissal of appellants’ interim relief applications under Section 17 of the Arbitration Act, holding no prima facie case or irreparable injury was shown to restrain alienation of disputed built-up area.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Section 17 interim relief Interim injunction Prima facie case

TARC Projects Limited v. Union of India & Ors.

06 Oct 2025 · Prathiba M. Singh; Shail Jain · 2025:DHC:8800-DB

The Delhi High Court held that electricity is a 'good' not liable to service tax per se, remanding the factual determination of taxability of electricity charges collected by a mall owner to the adjudicating authority.

tax other Significant service tax electricity supply goods vs service Finance Act 1994

Mohammad Aamir v. Mohd Arif Ansari

06 Oct 2025 · Saurabh Banerjee · MANU/DE/1513/2018

The Delhi High Court allowed the landlord's revision petition, holding that a better title and bona fide requirement suffice for eviction under the DRC Act despite unregistered documents and absence of rent receipts.

property appeal_allowed Significant Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958 Section 14(1)(e) eviction petition bona fide requirement

Sumitra Senior Citizen v. Sunita & Ors.

06 Oct 2025 · Tara Vitasta Ganju · 2025:DHC:8917

The Delhi High Court condoned delay and allowed exemption from filing certified copies but dismissed the petition as withdrawn with liberty to file an appropriate petition.

civil petition_dismissed Procedural condonation of delay exemption from filing certified copies Section 115 CPC Order XII Rule 6 CPC

Sh. Samarendra Das v. M/s Win Medicare Pvt. Ltd.

06 Oct 2025 · Tara Vitasta Ganju · 2025:DHC:8918

The Delhi High Court upheld the Labour Court’s finding that a medical sales representative is not a 'workman' under the Industrial Disputes Act, dismissing the writ petition challenging this classification.

labor petition_dismissed Significant workman definition medical sales representative Industrial Disputes Act 1947 Article 226 Constitution

The Commissioner of Income Tax (International Taxation)-1, New Delhi v. M/s Expeditors International of Washington Inc.

06 Oct 2025 · V. Kameswar Rao; Vinod Kumar · 2025:DHC:8830-DB

The Delhi High Court dismissed the Revenue's appeal against the ITAT order deleting additions treating certain receipts as fees for technical services or royalty, reaffirming the principle of consistency in coordinate bench decisions under the Income Tax Act and India-USA DTAA.

tax appeal_dismissed Significant Income Tax Act, 1961 fees for technical services royalty India-USA DTAA

Vaibhav Malik v. Delhi Development Authority and Others

06 Oct 2025 · Navin Chawla; Madhu Jain · 2025:DHC:8881-DB

The Delhi High Court held that the Departmental Promotion Committee and Limited Departmental Competitive Examination are independent recruitment modes and vacated the Tribunal's interim order restraining the LDCE, affirming the petitioner's locus standi to challenge the order.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant Limited Departmental Competitive Examination Departmental Promotion Committee Assistant Section Officer Delhi Development Authority

Poonam Bhargava v. The Municipal Corporation of Delhi & Anr.

06 Oct 2025 · Mini Pushkarna · 2025:DHC:8873

The Delhi High Court directed fresh consideration of the petitioner’s representation for grant of veterinary license, applying its earlier batch order and mandating compliance with relevant policies and rules.

administrative petition_allowed Significant writ petition veterinary license Delhi Development Authority Municipal Corporation of Delhi

Deepti v. Tata Power Delhi Distribution Ltd.

06 Oct 2025 · Mini Pushkarna · 2025:DHC:8874

The Delhi High Court directed installation of an electricity connection without deciding property ownership, clarifying that such connection does not confer ownership rights.

administrative petition_allowed electricity connection property ownership installation of electricity meter title dispute

Dinesh Kumar v. Municipal Corporation of Delhi

06 Oct 2025 · Mini Pushkarna · 2025:DHC:8862

The Delhi High Court granted interim protection against demolition pending the filing and hearing of an appeal before the Appellate Tribunal Municipal Corporation of Delhi due to the absence of a Presiding Officer.

administrative petition_allowed Demolition Order Municipal Corporation of Delhi Appellate Tribunal Municipal Corporation of Delhi interim protection

Resident Welfare Association v. Municipal Corporation of Delhi

06 Oct 2025 · Mini Pushkarna · 2025:DHC:8861

The Delhi High Court directed municipal authorities to jointly inspect alleged illegal encroachments on public land and take lawful action to remove them, ensuring due process and notice to occupiers.

administrative petition_allowed illegal encroachment public land joint inspection Municipal Corporation of Delhi