Delhi High Court

92,628 judgments

Year:

Union of India v. Akhilesh Kumar Gupta

06 Oct 2025 · C. Hari Shankar; Om Prakash Shukla · 2025:DHC:8867-DB
Cites 3 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court dismissed the Union of India's writ petition and upheld the Armed Forces Tribunal's grant of disability pension for Primary Hypertension, affirming the presumption of service connection and the limited scope of writ jurisdiction.

administrative petition_dismissed Significant disability pension Primary Hypertension Armed Forces Tribunal Release Medical Board

Rahis Mirza @ Kamal v. S. Parambir Singh

06 Oct 2025 · Anil Ksheterpal; Harish Vaidyanathan Shankar · 2025:DHC:8844-DB

The Delhi High Court allowed the appeal and removed the condition of depositing Rs. 50 Lakhs for leave to contest a suit where the defendant had a prima facie defence and was acquitted in related criminal proceedings.

civil appeal_allowed Significant interim order leave to contest conditional deposit prima facie defence

Nitco Logistics Pvt Ltd v. Commissioner of Customs Airport and General

06 Oct 2025 · Prathiba M. Singh; Shail Jain · 2025:DHC:8952-DB
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court held that revocation of a CHA license must be proportionate to the infraction and quashed the permanent revocation imposed on Nitco Logistics Pvt. Ltd., restricting it to four years with conditions for renewal.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant Customs Act, 1962 Customs Housing Agent CHA license revocation proportionality doctrine

M/S PITAMBER SOLVEX PRIVATE LIMITED v. UNION OF INDIA & ORS

06 Oct 2025 · Prathiba M. Singh; Shail Jain · 2025:DHC:8890-DB
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

Delhi High Court grants TRQ exemption and refund of customs duty to importer for goods with bill of lading dated before cutoff despite landing after, relying on coordinate bench precedent and dismissing jurisdictional objections.

administrative petition_allowed Significant Tariff Rate Quota Customs Duty Exemption Notification Bill of Lading

ACME INDIA v. UNION OF INDIA, DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE & ORS

06 Oct 2025 · Prathiba M. Singh; Shail Jain · 2025:DHC:8879-DB

The Delhi High Court allowed a writ petition challenging a GST order passed without hearing, permitting the petitioner to file a belated appeal with adjustment of pre-deposit.

tax appeal_allowed Significant natural justice CGST Act Input Tax Credit adjournment

MS MARKEX BRANDING SOLUTIONS PVT LTD v. THE DGST COMMISSIONER & ORS.

06 Oct 2025 · Prathiba M. Singh; Shail Jain · 2025:DHC:8877-DB

The Delhi High Court dismissed the writ petition challenging a GST demand order passed after an opportunity of personal hearing was not availed, allowing the petitioner to file an appeal pending the Supreme Court's decision on the validity of related GST notifications.

tax appeal_allowed Significant Article 226 Constitution of India Section 168A GST Act Show Cause Notice Personal Hearing

Namdhari Timmber Pvt Ltd v. Union of India & Ors.

06 Oct 2025 · Prathiba M. Singh; Shail Jain · 2025:DHC:8878-DB

The Delhi High Court held that retrospective cancellation of GST Registration is impermissible unless explicitly stated in the Show Cause Notice and set aside such retrospective cancellation in this case.

administrative petition_allowed Significant GST Registration retrospective cancellation Show Cause Notice Article 226

Commissioner of Customs, Inland Container Depot (Export) Tughlaqabad, Delhi v. Sudhir Gulati

06 Oct 2025 · Prathiba M. Singh; Shail Jain · 2025:DHC:8880-DB

The Delhi High Court allowed the appeal restoring the matter to CESTAT following the Supreme Court's ruling that DRI officers are proper officers under Section 28 of the Customs Act, 1962, competent to issue show cause notices.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant Directorate of Revenue Intelligence proper officer Customs Act 1962 Section 28

Sushil Sharma v. Commissioner of Customs [Export]

06 Oct 2025 · Prathiba M. Singh; Shail Jain · 2025:DHC:8887-DB
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court upheld penalties on Customs House Agent employees for failing to prevent illegal importation of contraband cigarettes, affirming their supervisory liability under the Customs Act, 1962.

administrative appeal_dismissed Significant Customs Act, 1962 Custom House Agent Penalty under Section 112 Illegal importation

Brijesh Kumar and Others v. Union of India and Others

06 Oct 2025 · C. Hari Shankar; Om Prakash Shukla · 2025:DHC:8922-DB
Cites 0 · Cited by 2

The Delhi High Court allowed withdrawal of a writ petition seeking ante-dated seniority due to non-impleadment of affected parties, granting liberty to refile after proper impleadment.

administrative other writ petition ante-dated seniority impleadment procedural defect

Medical Council of India v. Dr. Meenakshi Gautham & Anr.

06 Oct 2025 · Nitin Wasudeo Sambre; Anish Dayal · 2025:DHC:8842-DB
Cites 0 · Cited by 1

The Delhi High Court held that an appeal under Section 19(1) of the Contempt of Courts Act is maintainable only against orders imposing punishment for contempt, dismissing the Medical Council of India's appeal as premature and not maintainable.

administrative appeal_dismissed Significant Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 Section 19(1) appeal maintainability jurisdiction to punish for contempt

M/S SPMS Abrasive v. Union of India & Ors.

06 Oct 2025 · Prathiba M. Singh; Shail Jain · 2025:DHC:8872-DB

The Delhi High Court set aside an ex-parte GST adjudication order for lack of hearing and remanded the matter for fresh adjudication, leaving the validity of related GST notifications open pending Supreme Court decision.

tax appeal_allowed Significant Goods and Services Tax Section 168A Show Cause Notice Natural Justice

Union of India v. GP Capt Kamlesh Prasad Gupta Retd

06 Oct 2025 · C. Hari Shankar; Om Prakash Shukla · 2025:DHC:8869-DB
Cites 3 · Cited by 0

The High Court upheld the Armed Forces Tribunal’s grant of disability pension for Diabetes Mellitus Type-II, affirming the presumption that disabilities arising during service are service-connected unless the employer proves otherwise, and limited its writ jurisdiction to errors of law apparent on the record.

administrative petition_dismissed Significant disability pension armed forces Diabetes Mellitus Type-II presumption of sound health

Union of India v. Ex HFO Rishi Kumar Tangar

06 Oct 2025 · C. Hari Shankar; Om Prakash Shukla · 2025 SCC OnLine Del 2355
Cites 3 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court dismissed the Union of India's petition and upheld the Armed Forces Tribunal's grant of disability pension for Primary Hypertension, affirming the presumption that disabilities not recorded at entry are attributable to military service and limiting the scope of certiorari review.

administrative petition_dismissed Significant disability pension Primary Hypertension Armed Forces Tribunal Release Medical Board

Mahila Constable M/Ct. GD Pankaj Kumari v. Union of India

06 Oct 2025 · C. Hari Shankar; Om Prakash Shukla · 2025:DHC:8870-DB

The High Court disposed of a writ petition as withdrawn after the petitioner’s transfer rendered the grievance non-surviving.

administrative petition_dismissed writ petition service grievance transfer infructuous petition

Union of India and Ors. v. Ex Sea I UW Anil Kumar

06 Oct 2025 · C. Hari Shankar; Om Prakash Shukla · 2025 SCC OnLine SC 895
Cites 3 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court dismissed the Union of India's petition and upheld the Armed Forces Tribunal's grant of disability pension for seizure disorder, affirming the presumption that disability not noted at entry is attributable to service unless disproved by the employer.

administrative petition_dismissed Significant disability pension armed forces seizure disorder certiorari jurisdiction

M/S Nohar Chand Loha Bhandar & Ors. v. M/S Shri Bajrang Power and Ispat Ltd

06 Oct 2025 · C. Hari Shankar; Om Prakash Shukla · 2025:DHC:8871-DB

The High Court set aside an ex parte interim order and directed a fair hearing with procedural safeguards before the learned Commercial Court on the application under Order XXXIX Rules 1 and 2 CPC.

civil appeal_allowed Procedural Order XXXIX Rules 1 and 2 CPC interim injunction ex parte order procedural fairness

Daulat Ram Dharam Bir Auto Pvt Ltd and Ors v. Pivotal Infrastructure Pvt Ltd and Ors

06 Oct 2025 · Jyoti Singh · 2025:DHC:8825
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court upheld the arbitrator’s dismissal of appellants’ interim relief applications under Section 17 of the Arbitration Act, holding no prima facie case or irreparable injury was shown to restrain alienation of disputed built-up area.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Section 17 interim relief Interim injunction Prima facie case

TARC Projects Limited v. Union of India & Ors.

06 Oct 2025 · Prathiba M. Singh; Shail Jain · 2025:DHC:8800-DB

The Delhi High Court held that electricity is a 'good' not liable to service tax per se, remanding the factual determination of taxability of electricity charges collected by a mall owner to the adjudicating authority.

tax other Significant service tax electricity supply goods vs service Finance Act 1994

Mohammad Aamir v. Mohd Arif Ansari

06 Oct 2025 · Saurabh Banerjee · MANU/DE/1513/2018

The Delhi High Court allowed the landlord's revision petition, holding that a better title and bona fide requirement suffice for eviction under the DRC Act despite unregistered documents and absence of rent receipts.

property appeal_allowed Significant Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958 Section 14(1)(e) eviction petition bona fide requirement