Delhi High Court
33,049 judgments
Shri Hari Shamsher Kaushik v. Shri Jasbir Singh
The Delhi High Court upheld dismissal of a complaint under Section 138 N.I. Act for non-impleadment of the company, affirming that vicarious liability under Section 141 arises only if the company is prosecuted as the principal accused.
Jai Kishan Datwani v. State, Govt. of NCT Delhi
The Delhi High Court upheld the Sessions Court's order setting aside the discharge of the accused under Sections 498A and 304B IPC, directing committal for trial based on prima facie evidence of cruelty and antemortem injuries.
Lumax Industries Limited & Ors. v. Hindustan Auto Industries
The Delhi High Court directed the Trial Court to hear the petitioners' interlocutory applications for ex parte injunction and appointment of Local Commissioner before service of summons on the respondent, allowing the petition for appropriate directions.
Surinder Pal Vij v. Gurmeet Singh Baweja & Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that a writ petition under Article 226 is not maintainable against a private company not discharging public functions, dismissing the challenge to election notices of the All India Motor Transport Congress.
Sholay Media Entertainment and Anr. v. Yogesh Patel and Ors.
The Delhi High Court upheld the plaintiffs' exclusive rights in the mark 'SHOLAY', granted permanent injunctions against the defendants' unauthorized use of the mark and domain names, and awarded damages and costs for trademark infringement and passing off.
National Highway Authority of India v. MEP Chennai Bypass Toll Road Pvt. Ltd.
The Delhi High Court held that an ad hoc Arbitral Tribunal not bound by institutional rules may fix its own fees, and a party's acquiescence bars later challenge to the Tribunal's mandate on fee grounds.
Pritam Singh v. Ashok Kumar Makkar
The Delhi High Court allowed the petitioner to summon two additional defence witnesses and directed strict adherence to trial dates without adjournments to ensure expeditious disposal.
Tanya Sharma v. Delhi Subordinate Services Selection Board & Ors.
The Delhi High Court allowed the writ petition directing DSSSB to appoint the petitioner with seniority as per merit and imposed costs for administrative delay in processing her candidature.
Sanjana Rai alias Ankita Rai v. State and Anr.
The Delhi High Court upheld the conviction of Sanjana Rai for trafficking and sexually exploiting a minor, affirming that minor inconsistencies in a child victim's testimony do not undermine the prosecution's case.
Union of India v. Delhi State Consumer Co Operative Federation Ltd.
The Delhi High Court held that an arbitral tribunal can recall its termination order under Section 25(a) of the Arbitration Act on sufficient cause, and the High Court can supervise such jurisdictional failures under Article 227.
State NCT of Delhi v. Akash @ Gunni
The Delhi High Court upheld the acquittal of the accused in a sexual offence case against a minor victim due to unreliable testimony and lack of corroborative evidence.
Emandi A R Ajay Kumar v. Union of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court directed the respondents to consider and grant pro-rata pension to an ex-IAF personnel with over 10 years of service, in line with government notifications and prior judgments.
Saloni Bansal and Ors. v. Union of India and Ors.
The Delhi High Court directed the Central Administrative Tribunal to expeditiously dispose of the petitioners' recruitment-related dispute to prevent prejudice caused by undue delay.
Flyover Distillers and Bottlers Private Limited v. OM Sons Marketing Private Limited
The Delhi High Court directed expeditious hearing of the appellant's application under Section 39(4) CPC to vacate an ex parte injunction, emphasizing timely disposal and limited arguments.
Ram Kumar v. Oriental Insurance Company Ltd.
The Delhi High Court dismissed a decade-delayed appeal against a motor accident claim award, holding that the appellant failed to demonstrate sufficient cause for condonation of delay or justify setting aside the ex-parte award.
Din Dayal v. Director General Central Industrial Security Force & Ors.
The Delhi High Court directed the CISF to consider the petitioner’s request for posting in his home sector as per service policy and stayed the transfer orders pending such consideration.
Jagjeet Singh v. Union of India
The Delhi High Court referred contract payment disputes involving common questions to a sole arbitrator for adjudication under the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.
Jagjeet Singh v. Union of India
The Delhi High Court directed reference of payment-related contractual disputes involving common issues to a sole arbitrator under the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.
Raj Kumari Taneja v. Rajinder Kumar & Ors.
The Delhi High Court appointed an arbitrator under Section 11(5) of the Arbitration Act to resolve partnership disputes, holding that questions of settlement are for the arbitrator to decide.
Raj Kumari Taneja v. Rajinder Kumar & Anr.
The Delhi High Court held that under Section 11(5) of the Arbitration Act, the Court must appoint an arbitrator if an arbitration agreement exists and the petition is timely, leaving factual disputes such as settlement to the arbitrator.