Delhi High Court
71,673 judgments
Zakir Khan v. Union of India
The Delhi High Court quashed COFEPOSA detention orders due to non-supply and supply of illegible relied upon documents, which vitiated the detaining authority's subjective satisfaction and violated constitutional safeguards under Article 22(5).
Union of India v. Indian Agro Marketing Co Operative Ltd
The Delhi High Court held that arbitral tribunals have the power to recall termination orders under Section 25(a) of the Arbitration Act and directed the arbitrator to consider the petitioner’s recall applications, allowing the petitions under Article 227 due to absence of alternate remedy.
Garg Builders v. Hindustan Prefab Limited & Anr.
Judgment delivered by Delhi High Court in a commercial dispute between Garg Builders and Hindustan Prefab Limited.
M/S Garg Builders v. Hindustan Prefab Ltd. & Anr.
Judgment in a commercial dispute between M/s Garg Builders and Hindustan Prefab Ltd. delivered by Delhi High Court on 2nd September 2021.
Garg Builders v. Hindustan Prefab Ltd. & Anr.
The Delhi High Court held that invocation of unconditional bank guarantees cannot be restrained except in exceptional cases of egregious fraud or irretrievable injustice, dismissing the petitioner’s plea to stay invocation pending arbitration.
GOEL ROAD CARRIERS PRIVATE LIMITED v. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CIRCLE-10(2), DELHI & ANR
The Delhi High Court held that recovery of disputed tax demand beyond 20% without reasons and stay is unauthorized, directing refund of excess amounts adjusted without due procedure.
Seven Seas Hospitality Private Limited v. Principal Commissioner of Income Tax Central, Delhi - 3 & Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that tax authorities must exercise discretion judiciously and pass reasoned orders with personal hearing when deciding stay applications under Section 220(6) of the Income Tax Act, allowing relaxation of the 20% deposit condition in appropriate cases.
Rajesh Gupta and Others v. Dinesh Gupta and Others
The Delhi High Court upheld the Arbitral Tribunal’s refusal to entertain premature counter-claims lacking a cause of action under the Family Settlements, affirming the Tribunal’s jurisdictional authority under Section 16 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.
Jindal Exports and Imports Private Limited v. Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax, Circle 13-1 & Ors.
The Delhi High Court set aside reassessment orders issued in the name of a non-existing company and remanded the matter for fresh adjudication after providing the petitioner adequate opportunity of hearing.
Rachit Malhotra v. One97 Communications Ltd
The Delhi High Court clarified that interlocutory observations do not bar the appellant from arguing that his rights under an ESOP scheme did not lapse, allowing the appeal and vacating the interim order.
Chhavi v. University of Delhi
The Delhi High Court dismissed the writ petition challenging the University of Delhi's restriction limiting the number of papers in the Second Centenary Chance examination, holding that academic policy decisions are within the university's exclusive discretion and not subject to judicial interference absent arbitrariness.
CLN ENERGY PVT. LTD. v. E ASHWA AUTOMOTIVE PRIVATE LIMITED
The Delhi High Court appointed an arbitrator under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, to resolve disputes arising from a contract containing a valid arbitration clause after the respondent failed to cooperate.
Mainudeen v. State
The Delhi High Court upheld the conviction and sentence of the appellant for robbery with a deadly weapon and illegal possession of arms, rejecting challenges based on discrepancies in the victim’s statement and lack of documentary proof of ownership.
Harinder Singh Chawla v. Rupinder Nayar
The Delhi High Court allowed the defendant's appeal permitting production of the original Will only upon court direction and for forensic examination, balancing the need for evidence with procedural efficiency.
Rajesh Kumar Gupta v. CBSE
The High Court dismissed the writ petition for failure to exhaust the statutory appeal remedy and held that procedural orders complied with do not warrant judicial interference.
Yogesh Middha v. Municipal Corporation of Delhi (South) and Ors
The Delhi High Court dismissed a writ petition challenging illegal construction for lack of locus standi and absence of infringement of fundamental or legal rights, emphasizing that only affected parties or municipal authorities can seek such relief under Article 226.
M/S MM9 INTERNATIONAL v. UNION OF INDIA & ANR.
The Delhi High Court set aside an order and notice under the Income Tax Act for failure to grant the mandatory minimum statutory time to the assessee, emphasizing compliance with procedural safeguards and natural justice.
Amit Gupta v. Directorate General of GST Intelligence Headquarters
The Delhi High Court held that reversal of Input Tax Credit in the electronic ledger is a valid mode of satisfying bail deposit conditions under the CGST Act and set aside the cancellation of bail on this ground.
Deepak Madan v. State (Govt of NCT of Delhi) & Anr
The Delhi High Court granted transit anticipatory bail for 14 days to the petitioner apprehending arrest, subject to conditions ensuring cooperation with investigation, clarifying that the order is interim and without prejudice to trial.
Pradeep Kumar Chhabra v. Kumud Sharma@ Karun Sharma
The Delhi High Court upheld the maintainability of a suit based on title and ownership despite prior withdrawal of an eviction petition without liberty to file a fresh suit, holding the two proceedings involve distinct subject matters under Order XXIII Rule 1 CPC.