Mohit Saini v. Union of India

Delhi High Court · 06 May 2022 · 2022:DHC:1771-DB
Suresh Kumar Kait; Sudhir Kumar Jain
W.P.(C) 7102/2022
2022:DHC:1771-DB
administrative petition_allowed Significant

AI Summary

The Delhi High Court directed the respondents to consider and grant pro-rata pension to an ex-IAF personnel with over 10 years of service, in line with government notifications and prior judgments.

Full Text
Translation output
W.P.(C) 7102/2022
HIGH COURT OF DELHI
Date of Decision: 06.05.2022
W.P.(C) 7102/2022
MOHIT SAINI, EX CPL 904895-B ..... Petitioner
Through: Ms.Pallavi Awasthi, Adv.
VERSUS
UNION OF INDIA & ORS. ..... Respondents
Through: Mr.Jatin Singh, Senior Counsel for UOI.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURESH KUMAR KAIT
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUDHIR KUMAR JAIN
JUDGMENT
(oral)
CM APPL. 21782/2022 (exemption)

1. Allowed, subject to just exceptions.

2. The application is accordingly disposed of.

3. The present petition has been preferred seeking a direction to the respondents to grant pro-rata pension to the petitioner from the date of his discharge with all consequential benefits in terms of judgment dated 09.01.2019 in W.P.(C) No. 10026/2016 and judgment dated 08.02.2021 in 2022:DHC:1771-DB W.P (C) 9905/2019 passed by this Court.

4. Learned counsel for petitioner has submitted that vide Notification No. 8(3)/86/A/D (Pension/Services) dated 19.02.1987 and further, by circular No.A/49738/AG/PS4(c)/689/A/D(Pens/Sers) dated 21.04.1988 issued by the Government of India/Ministry of Defence, officers with not less than 10 years of qualifying service are entitled to receive pro-rata pension worked out under the method specified. Learned counsel further submits that the petitioner was enrolled in Indian Air Force (IAF) on 29.03.2005 and he stood discharged from services of IAF on 22.06.2017 after serving 12 years, 02 months and 18 days. Therefore, it is prayed that respondents be directed to issue pro-rata pension to the petitioner.

5. Notice issued.

6. Mr. Jatin Singh, learned Senior Panel Counsel has entered appearance on advance notice and submits that the case of the petitioner shall be considered and his pro-rata pension shall be released, if found eligible.

7. In view of aforesaid, we hereby dispose of the present petition with direction to respondents to consider the case of petitioner and release prorata pension, if found eligible, with appropriate interest in terms of judgment dated 09.01.2019 in W.P.(C) No. 10026/2016 and judgment dated 08.02.2021 in W.P (C) 9905/2019 passed by this Court.

8. With directions as aforesaid, the present petition is disposed of.

(SURESH KUMAR KAIT) JUDGE (SUDHIR KUMAR JAIN)

JUDGE MAY 06, 2022 ab