Delhi High Court

29,725 judgments

Year:

Bakhodirjon Sultonov v. Commissioner of Custom & Ors.

08 Oct 2025 · Prathiba M. Singh; Shail Jain · 2025:DHC:9007-DB

The Delhi High Court held that service of a Customs Order-in-Original on the petitioner's authorized advocate constitutes valid service, rendering the writ petition challenging detention of goods not maintainable and dismissible.

administrative petition_dismissed Significant Customs Act, 1962 Service of notice Authorized representative Show cause notice

Amit Kumar Basau & Anr. v. Sales Tax Officer Class II Avato Ward 13 (Special Zone) Zone 12 Delhi & Ors.

08 Oct 2025 · Prathiba M. Singh; Shail Jain · 2025:DHC:8956-DB

The Delhi High Court held that an unregistered partnership firm can file a writ petition through its partner to enforce statutory rights under the CGST Act, directing the petitioner to file an appeal with pre-deposit which shall be adjudicated on merits.

tax appeal_allowed Significant unregistered partnership firm Section 69 Indian Partnership Act writ petition maintainability statutory rights enforcement

Mukesh v. The State Govt of NCT Delhi

08 Oct 2025 · Vivek Chaudhary; Manoj Jain · 2025:DHC:8936-DB

The Delhi High Court dismissed a habeas corpus petition after finding the missing son was voluntarily absent and not wrongfully detained.

constitutional petition_dismissed habeas corpus wrongful detention Article 226 Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita 2023

Reepak Kansal v. Union of India

08 Oct 2025 · Devendra Kumar Upadhyaya; Tushar Rao Gedela · 2025:DHC:9034-DB

The Delhi High Court dismissed a PIL challenging the portrayal of the BCCI cricket team as 'Team India', holding that such representation by a private body does not violate constitutional or statutory provisions regarding national symbols.

constitutional petition_dismissed Significant Board of Control of Cricket in India Team India National Flag Emblems and Names Act

Rajendra Prasad Tyagi v. Union of India & Ors.

08 Oct 2025 · Devendra Kumar Upadhyaya; Tushar Rao Gedela · 2025:DHC:9033-DB

The Delhi High Court dismissed the appeal against the dismissal of a writ petition seeking compensation for alleged wrongful prosecution, holding that such claims require civil proceedings and cannot be adjudicated under Article 226.

constitutional appeal_dismissed Article 226 writ petition monetary compensation wrongful prosecution

Manjeet Singh v. The State (Govt. of NCT of Delhi)

08 Oct 2025 · Manoj Kumar Ohri · 2025:DHC:9039
Cites 3 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court upheld the appellant's conviction under Sections 451 and 354 IPC but modified the sentence by granting probation under the Probation of Offenders Act, 1958, recognizing the appellant's potential for reformation as a first-time offender.

criminal sentence_modified Significant Probation of Offenders Act, 1958 Section 451 IPC Section 354 IPC mandatory minimum sentence

Karuna Nath v. Dipender Nath

08 Oct 2025 · Anil Ksheterpal; Harish Vaidyanathan Shankar · 2025:DHC:8850-DB

The Delhi High Court upheld the Family Court's interim custody order granting custody to the father, emphasizing that the child's welfare is paramount and adultery alone does not determine custody.

family appeal_dismissed Significant child custody Guardians and Wards Act, 1890 Family Courts Act, 1984 interim custody

Anupama Sharma v. Sanjay Sharma

08 Oct 2025 · Anil Ksheterpal; Harish Vaidyanathan Shankar · 2025:DHC:8826-DB

The Delhi High Court upheld the Family Court's divorce decree on grounds of mental cruelty, emphasizing that sustained false allegations and physical violence constitute cruelty under Section 13(1)(ia) of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955.

family appeal_dismissed Significant mental cruelty Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 Section 13(1)(ia) divorce

Ferra Engineering Pty Limited v. Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax

08 Oct 2025 · V. Kameswar Rao; Vinod Kumar · 2025:DHC:8932-DB

The Delhi High Court set aside the reassessment order and remanded the matter for fresh consideration after the petitioner offered to submit documents, emphasizing the requirement to specify escaped income exceeding ₹50 lakhs before issuing notices under Section 148A(1) of the Income Tax Act.

tax appeal_allowed Significant Section 148A(1) Income Tax Act escaped income threshold reassessment notice capital gains tax

Sahib v. State Govt. of NCT of Delhi

08 Oct 2025 · Neena Bansal Krishna · 2025:DHC:8988

The Delhi High Court granted regular bail to a young accused in a murder case, emphasizing his limited role, clean antecedents, and absence of direct eyewitness identification.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant bail murder Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita 2023 Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita 2023

Sarthak Gupta v. Income Tax Officer Ward 35(1) & Anr.

08 Oct 2025 · V. Kameswar Rao; Vinod Kumar · 2025:DHC:8921-DB
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court quashed reassessment proceedings initiated beyond the limitation period under amended Income Tax Act provisions, following the Supreme Court's ruling in Union of India v. Rajeev Bansal.

tax petition_allowed Significant Income Tax Act, 1961 Section 148 Section 148A(d) Section 149

Basant Verma v. Delhi Jal Board

08 Oct 2025 · Mini Pushkarna · 2025:DHC:8940

The Delhi High Court directed the Delhi Jal Board to rectify an erroneous water bill by implementing its own recommended reduction and providing the petitioner a personal hearing.

administrative petition_allowed Delhi Jal Board water charges billing error Right to Information Act, 2005

Mohd. Javed Khan v. Municipal Corporation of Delhi

08 Oct 2025 · Mini Pushkarna · 2025:DHC:8939

The Delhi High Court granted limited interim protection against a demolition order to enable filing of an appeal before a non-functional municipal appellate tribunal, subject to conditions.

administrative petition_allowed Demolition Order Interim Protection Appellate Tribunal Municipal Corporation of Delhi Unauthorized Construction

Guneet Kaur Chadha v. Municipal Corporation of Delhi

08 Oct 2025 · Mini Pushkarna · 2025:DHC:8944

The Delhi High Court directed the MCD to file replies and the Appellate Tribunal MCD to expeditiously decide pending appeals regarding de-sealing of property floors, without granting interim relief or expressing opinion on merits.

administrative petition_dismissed Procedural de-sealing Appellate Tribunal MCD National Capital Territory of Delhi Laws (Special Provisions) Act, 2011 interim relief

Aradhna Gupta v. Janki Devi Memorial College

08 Oct 2025 · Prateek Jalan · 2025:DHC:8953

The court dismissed the petitioner’s challenge to promotions made through departmental examination and direct recruitment, directing administrative consideration of seniority-based promotion claims.

administrative petition_dismissed promotion Limited Departmental Examination direct recruitment Recruitment Rules 2008

Ramesh Chander v. Love Kumar Chopra & Ors.

08 Oct 2025 · Tara Vitasta Ganju · 2025:DHC:8990

The Delhi High Court dismissed a Civil Revision Petition under Section 115 CPC as not maintainable against a final decree disposing of two suits, especially after the petitioner sought withdrawal and did not appear.

civil petition_dismissed Section 115 CPC Civil Revision Petition final decree maintainability

Court of Its Own Motion v. Anuradha Misra

08 Oct 2025 · Vikas Mahajan · 2025:DHC:8948

The Delhi High Court dismissed a contempt petition against a tax officer for allegedly reiterating an earlier order without fresh reasons, holding that absence of wilful disobedience and reliance on CBDT circulars negated contempt.

administrative petition_dismissed Significant civil contempt wilful disobedience CBDT circular stay of demand

Union of India & Ors. v. Ex Sea I GS Anand Kumar Pandey

08 Oct 2025 · C. Hari Shankar; Om Prakash Shukla · 2025 SCC OnLine SC 895
Cites 3 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court upheld the Armed Forces Tribunal's grant of disability pension for Seizure Disorder aggravated by service, affirming the presumption of service connection and limiting writ interference to errors of law.

administrative petition_dismissed Significant disability pension armed forces seizure disorder presumption of sound health

HONOR DEVICE CO LTD v. LARGAN PRECISION CO LTD & ORS

08 Oct 2025 · C. Hari Shankar; Om Prakash Shukla · 2025:DHC:8946-DB

The Delhi High Court disposed of the appeal with procedural directions for filing replies and final disposal of the interlocutory application, without expressing any opinion on the merits.

civil appeal_dismissed Procedural interlocutory application Order XXXIX Rules 1 and 2 CPC interim injunction appeal disposal

Municipal Corporation of Delhi v. Himalayan Flora and Aromas Pvt Ltd

08 Oct 2025 · Purushaindra Kumar Kaurav · 2025:DHC:8977

The Delhi High Court held that an Emergency Arbitrator cannot extend the operation of an emergency arbitration order beyond 90 days, which power lies exclusively with the Arbitral Tribunal, and set aside the extended order accordingly.

arbitration appeal_allowed Significant Emergency Arbitrator Arbitral Tribunal Delhi International Arbitration Centre Rules 2023 Rule 14.13