Delhi High Court
58,461 judgments
Krishna Agencies v. Dr. Sabi Sabharwal
The Delhi High Court upheld an eviction order allowing substituted service by publication and affixation under the Delhi Rent Control Act, affirming that failure to file leave to defend leads to deemed admissions and eviction.
JAGDAMBEY BUILDERS PVT LTD v. JATINDER SINGH VOHRA
The Delhi High Court dismissed the suit for specific performance as barred by limitation under Article 54 of the Limitation Act, holding that the fixed date for performance expired and the Plaintiff had notice of refusal well before filing the suit.
Arun Kumaran B v. Urmila Pal & Ors.
The Delhi High Court allowed the appeal setting aside recovery rights against the owner and driver where the driver held a valid driving license and was not a minor at the time of the accident.
Sumit Kumar v. Union of India
The Delhi High Court held that while there is no absolute right to spousal transfer, railway authorities must genuinely consider such requests subject to administrative feasibility, directing expeditious reconsideration of the petitioners' transfer applications.
Mahender Singh v. Union of India
The Delhi High Court disposed of the writ petition directing the respondent to treat it as a representation and pass a reasoned order within six weeks, reserving the petitioner’s right to challenge thereafter.
Indian Oil Corporation Limited v. Man Industries (India) Limited
The Delhi High Court upheld the setting aside of an arbitral award on the ground that the sole arbitrator was unilaterally appointed by a party with interest, rendering the arbitrator de jure ineligible and the award void under Section 12(5) of the Arbitration Act and Article 14 of the Constitution.
Air Force Naval Housing Board v. Umaxe Projects Pvt Ltd
The Delhi High Court upheld the setting aside of arbitral awards due to invalid unilateral appointment of the sole arbitrator without valid express waiver under Section 12(5) of the Arbitration Act, affirming the principle of equal treatment and impartiality in arbitration.
SAKSHI ELECRICALS POLYMERS ENGG CORPN v. Government of NCT Delhi & Anr.
Delhi High Court dismissed the writ petition challenging GST limitation extension notifications pending Supreme Court decision, upheld demand order after reply, and quashed a time-barred Show Cause Notice.
Shasmith Technologies Private Limited v. Max Healthcare Institute Limited
The Delhi High Court allowed the appellant to withdraw the commercial appeal following an amicable settlement, disposing of the matter without adjudication.
Sunbeam Real Ventures Private Limited v. Sales Tax Officer Class II/Avato Ward 86 Zone 9
The Delhi High Court dismissed the writ petition challenging GST tax demand orders passed without personal hearing, allowing the petitioner to file an appeal with pre-deposit, while deferring the validity of related notifications to the Supreme Court.
Amit Kumar Basau & Anr. v. Sales Tax Officer Class II/Avato Ward 13 (Special Zone) Zone 12 Delhi & Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that an unregistered partnership firm can enforce statutory rights through a partner via writ petition and set aside an ex-parte tax demand order for lack of opportunity to be heard, remanding the matter for fresh adjudication while leaving the validity of impugned GST notifications open pending Supreme Court decision.
M/S PRAMILA MOTORS PVT LTD v. M/S OKINAWA AUTOTECH INTERNATIONAL PVT LTD
The Delhi High Court held that under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, the court’s role is limited to a prima facie examination of the existence of an arbitration agreement and appointed the arbitrator accordingly, leaving substantive disputes to the arbitral tribunal.
Pushpa Rani v. ACIT
The Delhi High Court dismissed the tax appeal for failure to show sufficient cause for condonation of 881 days delay in filing, upholding strict adherence to limitation periods in tax appeals.
Amit Kumar Basau & Anr. v. Sales Tax Officer Class II/Avato Ward 13 (Special Zone), Zone 12, Delhi & Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that an unregistered partnership firm can file a writ petition through its partner to challenge GST show cause notices improperly served via a non-visible GST portal tab, setting aside ex-parte orders and remanding for fresh adjudication with a fair hearing.
Suraj Industries v. Govt of NCT of Delhi & Ors.
The Delhi High Court set aside an ex-parte GST adjudication order for denial of opportunity to be heard, remanding the matter for fresh adjudication while leaving the validity of extension notifications to the Supreme Court.
Amit Kumar Basau & Anr. v. Sales Tax Officer Class II Avato Ward 13 (Special Zone) Zone 12 Delhi & Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that an unregistered partnership firm can file a writ petition through a partner to challenge GST demands, set aside ex-parte orders passed without proper notice, and remanded the matter for fresh adjudication after affording hearing.
Zuber v. Municipal Corporation of Delhi & Anr.
The Delhi High Court directed reconsideration of the petitioner's representation for grant of Veterinary License and de-sealing of property, emphasizing procedural fairness and compliance with statutory rules.
Veena Kohli v. New Delhi Municipal Corporation & Ors.
The Delhi High Court allowed the petitioner to carry out repair and renovation of her heritage building unit after granting requisite permissions, set aside the sealing order, and directed time-bound completion with municipal inspection.
M/S. COMPUTER MART v. NEW DELHI MUNICIPAL COUNCIL & ORS.
The Delhi High Court set aside an NDMC order restricting repair work on a heritage property and directed the petitioner to complete renovation within six months under official supervision.
State NCT of Delhi v. J Ravi
The Delhi High Court upheld the Trial Court's discharge of the accused from sexual offence charges, emphasizing the need for grave suspicion at charge framing and refusing to condone the State's delay in filing revision.