Delhi High Court

71,423 judgments

Year:

GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI v. SUNIL KUMAR

12 Jul 2022 · Sanjeev Sachdeva; Tushar Rao Gedela · 2022:DHC:2591-DB

The Delhi High Court upheld the Tribunal's order directing a review medical board to measure the respondent's height, confirming eligibility for appointment based on the measured height of 170.5 cm.

administrative appeal_dismissed height measurement medical board appointment eligibility independent government hospital

Ankur Aggarwal v. Central Bureau of Investigation

12 Jul 2022 · Swarana Kanta Sharma · 2022:DHC:2580

The Delhi High Court refused interim bail to an accused involved in a large-scale bank fraud due to prolonged abscondence and serious charges but ordered immediate medical treatment in custody.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant interim bail Section 439 CrPC forgery fraud

Shri Salek Chand Jain v. Ministry of Social Justice and Ors.

12 Jul 2022 · Satish Chandra Sharma; Subramonium Prasad · 2022:DHC:2541-DB

The Delhi High Court dismissed the writ petition seeking special status and welfare for De-Notified, Nomadic, and Semi-Nomadic Tribes, holding that the government has taken adequate steps to address their upliftment and integration.

constitutional petition_dismissed De-Notified Tribes Nomadic Tribes Semi-Nomadic Tribes Criminal Tribes Act, 1871

Flick Studios Pvt. Ltd. v. Gravity Entertainment Pvt. Ltd.

12 Jul 2022 · C. Hari Shankar · 2022:DHC:2636

The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition challenging the Commercial Court’s order directing fresh summons issuance in a summary suit, holding that valid service must be proved by affidavit and mere email endorsement is insufficient.

civil petition_dismissed Significant Order XXXVII CPC summary suit service of summons affidavit of service

Chithra N & Ors. v. All India Institute of Medical Sciences

12 Jul 2022 · Sanjeev Narula · 2022:DHC:2614

The Delhi High Court held that AIIMS cannot arbitrarily disqualify candidates holding INC-recognized distant learning nursing degrees from M.Sc. admission, quashing the impugned exclusion as violative of Article 14.

administrative petition_allowed Significant AIIMS eligibility criteria distant learning degree recognition Indian Nursing Council Article 14 equality

Siddhatha Singh v. Ajit Singh Bawa

12 Jul 2022 · Suresh Kumar Kait; Saurabh Banerjee · 2022:DHC:2549-DB
Cites 0 · Cited by 1

The Delhi High Court upheld summary judgment for the landlord in a commercial lease dispute, holding that COVID-19 lockdown did not excuse rent payment absent contractual provision suspending obligations.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant Order XIII A CPC summary judgment commercial lease force majeure

Rajesh Pant v. Telecom Disputes Settlement and Appellate Tribunal & Ors.

12 Jul 2022 · Chandra Dhari Singh · 2022:DHC:2546

The Delhi High Court held that Assistants in TDSAT appointed on deputation are not entitled to the upgraded pay scale and Grade Pay of Rs. 4600 granted to CSS/CSSS Assistants, as the differentiation based on mode of recruitment and organizational status is constitutionally valid.

service_law petition_dismissed Significant equal pay for equal work pay scale upgradation Grade Pay 4600 Central Secretariat Service

Sujit Gangopadhyay v. Telecom Disputes Settlement and Appellate Tribunal

12 Jul 2022 · Chandra Dhari Singh · 2022:DHC:2547

The Delhi High Court upheld the denial of upgraded pay scale and Grade Pay 4600 to a TDSAT Assistant appointed on deputation, holding that pay parity with CSS/CSSS posts requires similarity in recruitment mode and organizational classification.

service_law petition_dismissed Significant equal pay for equal work pay scale upgradation Grade Pay 4600 Central Secretariat Service

Anil Kumar Talan v. State (Government NCT of Delhi)

12 Jul 2022 · Anoop Kumar Mendiratta · 2022:DHC:2544
Cites 0 · Cited by 1

Anticipatory bail was denied to the petitioner implicated in a fabricated suicide and disappearance conspiracy in a matrimonial dispute, emphasizing prevention of misuse of criminal law.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant anticipatory bail Section 438 Cr.P.C. fabrication of evidence matrimonial dispute

Natco Pharma Limited v. Union of India

12 Jul 2022 · Prathiba M. Singh · 2022:DHC:2632

Delhi High Court allowed pre-grant opponent to file rebuttal expert affidavits and directed the Patent Office to clarify amendments and decide the patent opposition expeditiously, emphasizing procedural fairness and transparency.

intellectual_property petition_allowed Significant pre-grant opposition patent amendments cross-examination expert affidavits

Nishant Chawla v. Telecom Disputes Settlement and Appellate Tribunal

12 Jul 2022 · Chandra Dhari Singh · 2022:DHC:2548

The Delhi High Court dismissed the writ petition holding that the petitioner, appointed on deputation in TDSAT, is not entitled to pay scale and Grade Pay benefits granted to directly recruited CSS/CSSS employees due to lack of parity.

service_law petition_dismissed Significant equal pay for equal work pay scale upgradation Grade Pay deputation

Ravi Dabas v. Delhi Police

12 Jul 2022 · Sanjeev Sachdeva; Tushar Rao Gedela · 2022:DHC:2599-DB

The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition challenging medical fitness for police recruitment as withdrawn and imposed costs on the petitioner for non-compliance and causing judicial time to be spent.

administrative petition_dismissed medical fitness vision test constable recruitment withdrawal of petition

Udip Pradhan v. State (NCT of Delhi)

12 Jul 2022 · Jasmeet Singh · 2022:DHC:2590
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition to quash an FIR based on disputed video evidence, holding that such issues must be decided by the trial court and emphasizing the sparing exercise of inherent jurisdiction under Section 482 CrPC.

criminal petition_dismissed Significant Section 482 CrPC quashing of FIR video evidence illegal arrest

Ace Tel Linkers Pvt Ltd v. Som Prakash Yadav & Ors.

12 Jul 2022 · C. Hari Shankar · 2022:DHC:2556

The Delhi High Court refused to interfere with the trial court's closure of the petitioner's right to lead evidence after repeated adjournments but granted one final opportunity to produce the witness under Article 227 supervisory jurisdiction.

civil appeal_dismissed Article 227 Constitution of India adjournment leading evidence closure of evidence

Triveni Healthcare Private Ltd v. Govt of NCT of Delhi & Anr.

12 Jul 2022 · The Chief Justice; Subramonium Prasad; Satish Chandra Sharma · 2022:DHC:2538-DB

The Delhi High Court upheld the refusal to grant tender relaxations to a Start-up in a critical healthcare procurement, emphasizing discretionary policy application and patient safety concerns.

administrative petition_dismissed Significant Start-up India initiative MSME public procurement tender conditions

Devender @ Manu v. The State (NCT of Delhi)

12 Jul 2022 · Rajnish Bhatnagar · 2022:DHC:2670

The High Court held that a change of counsel does not entitle the accused to re-examine prosecution witnesses already cross-examined, and upheld the trial court's refusal to summon such witnesses for further cross-examination.

criminal petition_dismissed Section 311 Cr.P.C. Section 294 Cr.P.C. Cross-examination Change of counsel

Madan Lal Suryawanshi v. Tara Devi

12 Jul 2022 · C. Hari Shankar · 2022:DHC:2561
Cites 0 · Cited by 3

The Delhi High Court upheld the learned Civil Judge's discretionary orders condoning delay in substitution of legal heirs in execution proceedings, emphasizing the need to avoid technicalities that impede decree enforcement.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant condonation of delay execution proceedings substitution of legal heirs Order XXII Rule 3 CPC

Lakhbir Singh and Ors. v. Employees Provident Fund Organisation, Central Delhi

12 Jul 2022 · Dinesh Kumar Sharma · 2022:DHC:2647

The Delhi High Court directed the EPFO to dispose of pending complaints within a stipulated timeframe, recognizing the quasi-judicial nature of its proceedings and recording an undertaking for timely action.

administrative other Employees Provident Fund Organisation quasi-judicial proceedings inquiry disposal Circular No.C-I/3(19)2016

Food Corporation of India Shramik Union v. Food Corporation of India

12 Jul 2022 · Dinesh Kumar Sharma · 2022:DHC:2617

The Delhi High Court held that unilateral changes in service conditions proposed by Food Corporation of India cannot be implemented during ongoing conciliation proceedings under the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, and notices not strictly in prescribed form do not validate immediate implementation.

labor petition_dismissed Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 Section 9-A Section 19(2) Section 33

Boehringer Ingelheim International GmbH v. The Controller of Patents & Anr.

12 Jul 2022 · Prathiba M. Singh · 2022:DHC:2682

The Delhi High Court upheld the rejection of a divisional patent application filed for claims not originally claimed in the parent application, affirming that divisional applications require plurality of inventions in the parent claims under Section 16 of the Patents Act, 1970.

intellectual_property appeal_dismissed Significant divisional application plurality of inventions patent claims Section 16 Patents Act