Delhi High Court
71,423 judgments
Great Eastern Energy Corporation Ltd v. Executive Access (India) Pvt Ltd
The Delhi High Court disposed of a civil appeal by recording the parties' mediated Settlement Agreement, binding them to its terms and ending further litigation.
Synergytech Automation Pvt Ltd & Anr. v. M/S SMC Corporation (India) Pvt. Ltd.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the appeal, holding that the appellant failed to show sufficient cause to set aside the ex-parte decree under Order IX Rule 13 CPC due to negligence and unexplained delay.
Angel Gupta v. State (NCT of Delhi) & Anr.
The Delhi High Court upheld the cancellation of interim bail granted to the petitioner for violating bail conditions, including unauthorized travel and failure to provide mobile number details, emphasizing strict compliance with bail terms.
Sangeeta Gupta v. Vardhman Estates and Developers Pvt. Ltd.
The Delhi High Court appointed a sole arbitrator with agreed seat and fee structure to adjudicate disputes between parties who consented to arbitration.
Vinod v. State of NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court allowed the petitioner to withdraw the bail application without prejudice and granted liberty to file an application before the trial court after receipt of the FSL report.
Rajesh Kumar v. M/s Global Packaging
The Delhi High Court dismissed the writ petition challenging the Labour Court's finding of abandonment of service, holding that factual findings by Labour Courts are final unless there is manifest illegality or violation of natural justice.
Rajendra Prasad v. Union of India
The Delhi High Court directed the Ministry of Home Affairs to consider and decide proposals for rectifying pay anomalies in CRPF and ITBP by granting replacement pay scales effective from January 1, 1996, ensuring uniformity with other CAPFs.
Sanjay Negi v. State
The Delhi High Court granted bail to the petitioner in an NDPS case, holding that a co-accused's disclosure statement alone is insufficient to deny bail without independent corroborative evidence under Sections 29 and 37 of the NDPS Act.
Raju Thapa v. State
The High Court upheld convictions for robbery and possession of stolen property but set aside convictions under Section 397 IPC where injury by deadly weapon was caused by a discharged co-accused.
Naveen Bhadana v. The State (NCT of Delhi)
Anticipatory bail was refused to the accused due to serious allegations of assault, molestation, and threats against the prosecutrix and police officials, with the court emphasizing the gravity of offences and safety of complainants.
Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax-3 v. Ms. Minu Bakshi
The Delhi High Court upheld that penalty under Section 271(1)(c) cannot be automatically imposed for higher income disclosed in a Section 153A return without clear evidence of concealment and that penalty orders must specify grounds for imposition.
S P Parasher v. Union of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court upheld the CAT’s order denying pension and ACP benefits for the petitioner’s non-pensionable deputation period, holding that past service counts only if the employee exercises the option timely and is absorbed without promotion to a higher pay scale.
PCIT (Central)-3, New Delhi v. Prominent Real Tech Pvt. Ltd.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the Revenue's appeal, holding that reassessment under Sections 153A and 153C requires incriminating material linking seized documents to undisclosed income, which was absent in this case.
Food Corporation of India Shramik Union v. Food Corporation of India
The Delhi High Court held that unilateral changes in service conditions cannot be implemented during pending conciliation proceedings under the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, and writ petitions challenging such notices are not maintainable when statutory remedies exist.
Prasar Bharati v. Shyam Spectra Pvt Ltd
The Delhi High Court dismissed the appeal and upheld the Commercial Court's order setting aside an arbitral award, holding the claim barred by limitation and that no binding agreement for a 10% discount arose due to lack of mutual consent on contract renewal.
AXIS NIRMAN INDUSTRIES LTD & ANR. v. RAJENDRA KUMAR (HUF) THROUGH ITS KARTA
The Delhi High Court upheld the trial court's decree for possession, holding that an unregistered lease extension beyond one year is void and a decree on admission under Order XII Rule 6 CPC was rightly passed.
Sarvesh Bisaria v. Hari Om Anand
The Delhi High Court held that a loan given via negotiable instrument is exempt from the Punjab Money Lenders Act, allowing summary suit against the deceased's legal heirs where no substantial defence exists.
Ashok Kumar Jain v. Prem Chand Gupta
The Delhi High Court remanded the matter for fresh determination of mesne profits payable post-eviction, emphasizing that market rent must be based on cogent evidence specific to the premises rather than lease deeds of adjacent properties.
Sh. Mukesh v. BSES Rajdhani Power Ltd & Anr.
The Delhi High Court held that an occupant of premises is entitled to electricity connection under Section 43 of the Electricity Act, 2003, directing BSES to provide a prepaid connection despite ownership disputes.
GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI & ANR. v. INDIAN PROFESSIONAL NURSES ASSOCIATION
The Delhi High Court allowed the Government of NCT of Delhi's appeal against contempt directions, permitting both parties to present their case afresh before the Single Judge in the pending contempt petition.