Delhi High Court

71,423 judgments

Year:

Rafal Kumar Verma v. Union of India & Ors.

11 Jul 2022 · Suresh Kumar Kait; Saurabh Banerjee · 2022:DHC:2562-DB

The Delhi High Court directed respondents to consider the petitioner's claim for first annual increment and grant relief if found identically situated with others who received similar benefits in earlier cases.

administrative other writ petition annual increment service benefits parity

UOI & Ors. v. Mukh Ram Singh

11 Jul 2022 · Satish Chandra Sharma; Subramonium Prasad · 2022:DHC:2656-DB

The Delhi High Court upheld the CAT's quashing of a disciplinary order due to the disciplinary authority's failure to record reasons for disagreement with the inquiry report, emphasizing the necessity of reasoned findings in disciplinary proceedings.

administrative petition_dismissed Significant disciplinary proceedings charge-sheet inquiry officer report note of disagreement

Vishakha Facility Management (Pvt.) Ltd. v. Central Board of Trustees

11 Jul 2022 · Dinesh Kumar Sharma · 2022:DHC:2593

The Delhi High Court directed restoration of an EPF appeal dismissed for non-deposit after the petitioner complied with the deposit condition and restrained coercive recovery pending appeal disposal.

administrative appeal_allowed Section 70 EPF and MP Act appeal restoration coercive recovery action deposit condition

Kishan Lal Gupta and Ors. v. Kewal Krishan Bansal

11 Jul 2022 · Subramonium Prasad · 2022:DHC:2570

The Delhi High Court upheld eviction of tenants on landlord's bona fide requirement for his son to start a business, emphasizing substance over form in pleadings and rejecting tenancy denial after rent admission.

property appeal_dismissed Significant Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958 Section 14(1)(e) bona fide requirement eviction petition

Mahesh v. Chander Prakash Rishi

11 Jul 2022 · Subramonium Prasad · 2022:DHC:2569
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court upheld eviction of a tenant, holding that unregistered documents like General Power of Attorney and Agreement to Sell do not transfer property title, and bona fide requirement of a landlord to establish his unemployed son is valid ground for eviction.

property appeal_dismissed Significant Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958 eviction petition bona fide requirement General Power of Attorney

Sain Mahasabha Naraini Dham v. Dayanand Rithala

11 Jul 2022 · Subramonium Prasad · 2022:DHC:2576

The Delhi High Court upheld the Rent Controller's order granting leave to defend in an eviction petition where the tenant raised triable issues regarding the landlord's authority and locus standi, mandating further judicial scrutiny.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant leave to defend eviction petition locus standi Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958

Vishvjeet Kanwarparl & Anr. v. Diljeet Titus

11 Jul 2022 · C. Hari Shankar · 2022:DHC:2584
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court upheld the imposition of costs for condoning delay in filing a written statement, holding that COVID-19 limitation extensions do not apply where the limitation expired before 15 March 2020.

civil petition_dismissed condonation of delay costs Order VIII Rule 1 CPC Article 227 Constitution of India

Sain Mahasabha Naraini Dham Regd v. Narayan Dass

11 Jul 2022 · Subramonium Prasad · 2022:DHC:2575

The Delhi High Court upheld the Rent Controller's order granting leave to defend in an eviction petition, holding that disputed issues over the landlord's authority and tenant's rights constitute triable issues requiring adjudication.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant leave to defend eviction petition locus standi Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958

Dinesh Kumar v. Delhi Development Authority

11 Jul 2022 · Subramonium Prasad · 2022:DHC:2573
Cites 0 · Cited by 4

The Delhi High Court held that the DDA cannot charge interest on the balance 10% disposal cost if the allottee is willing to pay timely, setting aside the demand for interest as arbitrary and violative of Article 14.

administrative petition_allowed Significant DDA Housing Scheme 2014 balance 10% disposal cost interest demand lock-in period

Kuldeep Singh Baweja v. Amarjeet Singh Khurana

11 Jul 2022 · Subramonium Prasad · 2022:DHC:2568
Cites 0 · Cited by 3

The Delhi High Court upheld the eviction of a tenant on the landlord's bona fide ground of establishing his unemployed son by starting a business, dismissing tenant's plea for leave to defend due to lack of triable issues.

property appeal_dismissed Significant Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958 bona fide requirement leave to defend eviction petition

Vishesh Taneja v. Reeta

11 Jul 2022 · Purushaindra Kumar Kaurav · 2022:DHC:2654
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court upheld the Family Court’s interim maintenance order of Rs. 10,000 per month to the wife under Section 125 Cr.P.C., dismissing the husband’s revision petition despite his claims of unemployment and mental incapacity.

family appeal_dismissed Significant Section 125 Cr.P.C. interim maintenance family court revision petition

M/S. KAUTILYA FINANCE B. V. v. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CIRCLE INT.

08 Jul 2022 · Manmohan; Manmeet Pritam Singh Arora · 2022:DHC:2528-DB

The Delhi High Court set aside reassessment notices and order for failure to provide the petitioner a hearing opportunity, remanding the matter for fresh consideration in accordance with law.

tax appeal_allowed Significant Income Tax Act, 1961 Section 148A(b) Section 148A(d) Section 148

Sabareesh Rajan v. National Testing Agency

08 Jul 2022 · Sanjeev Narula · 2022:DHC:2607
Cites 2 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court dismissed writ petitions challenging NEET results on forgery allegations of OMR sheets, holding that disputed factual issues requiring evidence are not suitable for writ jurisdiction and no prima facie case was made out.

administrative petition_dismissed NEET examination OMR sheets forgery allegations writ petition

Vishwanath C K v. Union of India & Ors.

08 Jul 2022 · Suresh Kumar Kait; Saurabh Banerjee · 2022:DHC:2531-DB

The Delhi High Court directed the respondents to consider and grant pro-rata pension with arrears and interest to an ex-IAF employee in line with earlier binding judgments.

administrative petition_allowed Significant pro-rata pension Indian Air Force Central Civil Services (Pension) Rules, 1972 Notification 28/30/2004-P & PW (B)

Commissioner for Income Tax (E) Delhi v. M/S. India Evangelical Team

08 Jul 2022 · Manmohan; Manmeet Pritam Singh Arora · 2022:DHC:2525-DB

The Delhi High Court dismissed the Revenue’s appeal upholding the ITAT’s grant of exemption under Section 11 of the Income Tax Act to a religious society, reaffirming consistent judicial precedent against the Revenue’s challenge.

tax appeal_dismissed Significant Income Tax Act, 1961 Section 11 exemption charitable status religious activities

Shailesh Kumar Jha v. Union of India

08 Jul 2022 · Suresh Kumar Kait; Saurabh Banerjee · 2022:DHC:2522-DB

The Delhi High Court directed respondents to consider and grant pro-rata pension with arrears and interest to a discharged Indian Air Force employee in line with statutory rules and precedent.

administrative petition_allowed Significant pro-rata pension Central Civil Services (Pension) Rules, 1972 Notification No. 28/30/2004-P & PW (B) Indian Air Force pension

Mehjabeen v. BSES Rajdhani Power Limited

08 Jul 2022 · Manoj Kumar Ohri · 2022:DHC:2515

The Delhi High Court directed the petitioner to apply afresh and comply with procedural requirements for grant of a permanent electricity connection, without adjudicating ownership rights.

administrative petition_allowed permanent electricity connection temporary electricity connection Article 226 Constitution of India ownership dispute

Disruptive Health Solutions Private Limited v. Registrar of Trade Marks

08 Jul 2022 · Prathiba M. Singh · 2022:DHC:2545

The Delhi High Court allowed the appeal and set aside the rejection of the trademark 'HEALTHSKOOL' under Section 9(1)(b), holding that descriptive marks with acquired distinctiveness can be registered.

intellectual_property appeal_allowed Significant Trade Marks Act, 1999 Section 9(1)(b) descriptive mark distinctiveness

DELTA GUARDS PVT. LTD. v. UNION OF INDIA & ORS.

08 Jul 2022 · Rajiv Shakdher; Tara Vitasta Ganju · 2022:DHC:2532-DB

The Delhi High Court set aside the rejection of a declaration under the Sabka Vishwas Scheme for waiver of service tax interest, directing the Designated Committee to reconsider the matter after affording the petitioner an opportunity of hearing.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant Sabka Vishwas Scheme 2019 service tax interest waiver natural justice declaration rejection

M/S Kolmet Enterprises v. New Delhi Municipal Council

08 Jul 2022 · Manoj Kumar Ohri · 2022:DHC:2553

The Delhi High Court allowed the writ petition directing refund of alleged misuse charges with interest due to non-compliance with mandatory procedural requirements under the Electricity Act and DERC Regulations.

administrative petition_allowed Significant unauthorized use of electricity Section 126 Electricity Act 2003 DERC Regulations 2017 misuse charges