Delhi High Court
29,724 judgments
Vinod Gupta v. The State (NCT of Delhi)
The Delhi High Court dismissed the appellant's application for suspension of sentence and bail during appeal, upholding the conviction based on credible dying declaration and corroborative evidence under Section 302 IPC.
Urmila Devi v. The State NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court disposed of a Habeas Corpus petition after the missing daughter was produced before the Court and expressed her wish to return to her mother, negating claims of unlawful detention.
Sumant Batra v. State NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court granted bail to the petitioner in an economic offence case based on parity with co-accused, absence of direct incriminating evidence, and completion of investigation.
Dharmender Verma & Ors. v. The State NCT of Delhi & Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 498A, 406, and 34 IPC based on an amicable settlement between the parties, exercising its inherent powers under Section 482 CrPC.
Amit Kapania and Ors. v. The State (NCT of Delhi) and Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 498A, 406, and 34 IPC arising from matrimonial disputes based on an amicable settlement and mutual consent divorce, exercising its inherent powers under Section 482 CrPC.
DELHI KI GALIYAN NGO v. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER & ORS
The Delhi High Court dismissed a writ petition filed fraudulently in the name of an NGO, imposed costs on the unauthorized petitioner, and directed police investigation for misuse of the judicial process.
Koninklijke Philips N.V. v. M. Bathla & Anr.
The Delhi High Court held that defendants infringed plaintiff's Indian Patent No. 175971 relating to digital audio compression in VCDs, granting permanent injunction and damages while rejecting defendants' non-joinder and invalidity defenses.
Vishal Yadav & Anr. v. The State (Govt. of NCT of Delhi)
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 406, 420, and 120B IPC based on an amicable settlement between parties, exercising its inherent powers under Section 482 CrPC to prevent abuse of process and secure justice.
Ram Krishan Singh @ Dadu v. State of NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court modified the appellant's conviction under POCSO, setting aside charges of penetrative assault due to contradictions but upheld conviction for sexual assault by inappropriate touching, directing his release after considering time served.
Sabu Trade Private Limited v. Rajkumar Sabu & Ors.
The Delhi High Court upheld an interim injunction in favor of the registered proprietor Rajkumar Sabu over the trade mark 'SACHAMOTI', rejecting appellants' claims of prior use and ownership.
Sh Dinesh Singhal alias Sindhal v. Deepak Jain & Anr.
The High Court held that Sections 347B and 347E of the Delhi Municipal Corporation Act do not bar civil suits for injunction and damages due to unauthorized construction and upheld dismissal of the petition challenging the plaint's maintainability.
Sandeep Kumar v. Nihal Chand
The Delhi High Court upheld eviction of a tenant under Section 14(1)(e) of the Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958, holding that the landlord's bona fide requirement was established and the tenant failed to raise a triable issue for leave to defend.
Sh Tek Chand (Deceased) Through His Lrs v. Smt Meenakshi Gupta & Anr
The Delhi High Court set aside an eviction order for failure to properly consider bona fide requirement and tenant's defense, remanding the matter for fresh adjudication on landlord's genuine need under Section 14(1)(e) of the Delhi Rent Control Act.
Harish v. State (GNCT of Delhi) and Anr
The Delhi High Court granted regular bail to the accused in a child sexual assault case due to prima facie doubts arising from inconclusive identification, CCTV, and DNA evidence, imposing strict conditions to protect the victim and trial integrity.
Taranjeet Singh Kohli v. Kawaljeet Kaur Kohli
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition seeking condonation of a six-year delay in filing Written Statement, holding that negligence of previous counsel does not excuse such inordinate delay without a reasonable explanation.
AMD Estates and Developers Pvt Ltd v. VSR Infratech Pvt Ltd
The Delhi High Court granted interim relief protecting the Owner's share in a delayed real estate project under Section 9 of the Arbitration Act, while dismissing the Developer's injunction petition based on an unenforceable Right of First Refusal clause.
National Council of Education Research & Training v. M/s Murli Industries Ltd.
The Delhi High Court upheld an arbitral award directing return of forfeited Performance Security, holding that machinery breakdown was not force majeure and time was not of the essence of the contract.
R.K. Jain v. Suraj Sunar & Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the appeal for lack of territorial jurisdiction, limited the scope of review petition, and clarified that the plaintiff's residence alone does not confer jurisdiction under Section 20 CPC.
Neelendra Singh Chauhan v. Central Warehousing Corporation Regional Office
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition for appointment of arbitrator under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 as barred by the three-year limitation period under Article 137 of the Limitation Act, 1963, commencing from the date of the initial arbitration notice.
Apoorv Air Control v. GAIL India Limited
The Delhi High Court appointed an arbitrator under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 to adjudicate contractual disputes and counterclaims between Apoorv Air Control and GAIL India Limited.