Delhi High Court
58,104 judgments
PUMA SE v. Surender Singh and Anr.
The Delhi High Court allowed Puma SE's petition to cancel the deceptively similar trademark 'P11MA' registered by respondent no.1, holding it violated Sections 9 and 11 of the Trade Marks Act, 1999.
Harkesh Sharma v. National Insurance Co. Ltd.
The Delhi High Court allowed the appeal against dismissal of a motor accident claim, holding that delay in FIR registration and absence of damage to the offending vehicle do not conclusively disprove the accident or negligence.
Subodh Kumar v. Sanjay Kumar & Ors.
The Delhi High Court enhanced compensation for a motor accident victim by recalculating permanent disability, awarding loss of marriage prospects, increasing loss of amenities, and raising interest rate from 7.5% to 9% per annum.
Lalli Devi & Ors. v. Shriram Gen. Ins. Co. Ltd. & Ors.
The Delhi High Court allowed the motor accident claim appeal, holding that chargesheet filing and eyewitness testimony suffice to establish negligence for compensation under the Motor Vehicles Act.
Ms. Hemlata Rawat and Ms. Easha v. Standard Farms Pvt. Ltd. & Anr.
The Delhi High Court held that immunity under Section 245H(1) of the Income Tax Act requires explicit recording of satisfaction on full and true disclosure and cooperation, and dismissed review petitions upholding remand for fresh consideration.
Indo Engineering Project Corporation v. National Highways and Infrastructure Development Corporation Limited India
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition seeking interim relief against contract termination and fresh bidding notice due to the Petitioner's delay and held that the validity of termination is to be decided by arbitration.
Pfizer Inc. & Ors. v. Everest Pharmaceuticals Limited & Ors.
The Delhi High Court decreed patent infringement against defendants for unauthorized manufacture and sale of a generic version of plaintiffs' patented drug during patent validity, granting relief despite patent expiry during litigation.
RANANJAY PRATAP SINGH v. UNION OF INDIA AND ORS
The Delhi High Court dismissed the appeal, holding that service matters falling under the Administrative Tribunals Act, 1985 must be agitated before the Central Administrative Tribunal, not the High Court, reaffirming the Supreme Court's ruling in L. Chandra Kumar.
Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax - Central -1 v. Capital Power Systems Ltd.
The Delhi High Court held that reassessment under Section 150 of the Income Tax Act cannot be initiated without a clear finding or direction by appellate authorities that undisclosed income belongs to the assessee, dismissing Revenue's appeal to tax ₹7 crores in Capital Power Systems Ltd.'s hands.
JSW GMR Cricket Private Limited v. Mother's Eye Production Pvt Ltd
The Delhi High Court appointed a sole arbitrator under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 to adjudicate payment disputes arising from a brand promotion agreement, after the parties failed to agree on an arbitrator and the respondent failed to appear.
M/S MOD INTERIORS PVT LTD v. M/S DELHI STATE INDUSTRIAL AND INFRASTRUCTURE DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION LTD
The Delhi High Court appointed a sole arbitrator under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 to adjudicate a contract dispute involving penalty deductions, affirming the validity of the arbitration clause and procedural rights of parties.
MONEYWISE FINANCIAL SERVICES PVT LTD v. JAS ENTERPRISES THROUGH ITS PROPRIETOR SH DAVE
The Delhi High Court appointed a sole arbitrator under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 to adjudicate loan repayment disputes arising from a valid arbitration clause in the parties' agreement.
Roshni Devi v. IFFCO Tokio Gen Ins Co Ltd
The Delhi High Court enhanced compensation in a motor accident death claim by applying prospective income for a young graduate and granting increased loss of consortium to multiple heirs with inflation adjustment.
Chetak Logistics Ltd v. Union of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court quashed a tax authority's unreasoned order dismissing the taxpayer's reply to a show-cause notice and directed fresh adjudication with proper reasons.
M/S METRRO WASTE HANDLING PRIVATE LIMITED v. RESERVE BANK OF INDIA
The Delhi High Court directed the Reserve Bank of India to decide the petitioner's representation within six weeks, ensuring timely administrative action without adjudicating the merits.
Hakeem Ahmed Khan v. Lokesh Kumar & Ors.
The Delhi High Court enhanced compensation in a motor accident claim by reducing contributory negligence attributed to the injured passenger from 50% to 30%, holding the bus driver primarily liable for rash driving while the passenger was de-boarding.
M/S Zillion Infraprojects Pvt. Ltd v. The Indure Private Ltd
The Delhi High Court held that at the Section 11 stage, only the prima facie existence of an arbitration agreement is to be examined and appointed a sole arbitrator despite objections on stamping, limitation, and exhaustion of contractual remedies.
Aditya Saurabh v. Union of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court directed expeditious disposal of the petitioner’s appeal under the RBI Ombudsman Scheme regarding fraudulent e-wallet transactions and advised fresh representation to CIBIL to address adverse credit scoring.
Umrao Singh v. DDA
The Delhi High Court disposed of the petition seeking an approach road by directing the DDA to consider the petitioner’s representation and decide the matter expeditiously with a personal hearing.
Sh. Lagadapati Madhusudhan Rao & Ors. v. IDBI Bank Limited
The Delhi High Court held that a petitioner's ambiguous communication must be treated as a request for personal hearing, directing the bank to consider it and setting aside the impugned order passed without such consideration.