Delhi High Court
59,687 judgments
Sugandhi Snuff King Pvt. Ltd. & Anr. v. Commissioner Food Safety Govt. of NCT of Delhi & Ors.
The Delhi High Court upheld the validity of food safety prohibitions on tobacco-containing products like Gutka under the Food Safety and Standards Act, 2006, rejecting challenges that such regulation encroached upon the Cigarettes and Other Tobacco Products Act, 2003.
Kamal Rana v. Anju Singh
The Delhi High Court upheld eviction of tenant for bona fide requirement of landlord's daughter, holding that leave to defend was barred by delay and service on tenant's husband was valid.
Gita Rattan Institute of Advanced Studies and Training v. Government of NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court directed the GNCTD to grant a personal hearing and pass a reasoned order on the petitioner’s representation challenging fee revision and category downgrading, emphasizing the necessity of compliance with Court directions and communication of reasons.
Ajay Kumar v. Union of India and Ors
The Delhi High Court held that CRPF has discretionary power to transfer personnel based on operational needs and directed the respondents to provide a reasoned decision on the petitioner's transfer representation.
Reckitt Benckiser (India) Pvt. Ltd. v. Hindustan Unilever Limited
The Delhi High Court held that a comparative advertisement disparaging a competitor's product beyond permissible puffery warrants interim injunction restraining its broadcast.
Neeraj v. Manisha
The Delhi High Court directed the Family Court to endeavor expeditious disposal of a matrimonial petition in accordance with Section 21B of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955, without prescribing a specific timeframe.
Swastik Plastics v. Commissioner of DGST
The Delhi High Court set aside a GST adjudication order passed by the same officer who conducted search and seizure, directing fresh proceedings in line with revised guidelines to uphold natural justice.
Satyam Thapliyal v. Air India Limited
The Delhi High Court upheld Air India’s lawful termination of a pilot on fixed term contract for unauthorized absenteeism during COVID-19 lockdown and validated the demand for liquidated damages under the Surety Bond.
D.P. Sachdeva v. State Govt. of NCT of Delhi & Ors.
The Delhi High Court granted Probate to the petitioner as Executor of a duly registered Will executed by Smt. Basant Kaur, holding the Will valid despite objections regarding thumb impression and language, due to unchallenged evidence and absence of proof of forgery.
Rajiv Gandhi v. Union of India & Anr.
The Delhi High Court reserved and pronounced judgment in a criminal writ petition filed by Rajiv Gandhi against the Union of India involving the Enforcement Directorate, referencing orders in a related case.
Ashish Tewari v. G.P. Tewari and Anr.
The Delhi High Court allowed the plaintiff to lead limited rebuttal evidence to challenge the genuineness of signatures on a Relinquishment Deed despite concluded evidence, affirming the right to rebuttal evidence to ensure justice.
Siddhanth Mendiratta v. Madhu Chawla & Anr.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the appeal against a decree for possession based on admitted tenancy and rejected unsubstantiated claims of security deposit and low rent, affirming the Trial Court's jurisdiction and findings.
Biri Singh v. Delhi Transport Corporation
The Delhi High Court upheld the termination of a DTC conductor for misconduct in fare collection without issuing tickets, affirming that non-examination of passengers is not fatal to disciplinary proceedings.
Kamla Pasricha & Anr v. Surendera Nath Pasricha & Anr
The Delhi High Court allowed withdrawal of the appeal subject to setting aside adverse observations in paragraphs 14 and 15 of the impugned judgment, confirming the rest of the decree in a family property dispute.
Deepak Kumar Yadav v. Director General, SSB
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition seeking evaluation of an OMR answer sheet where the candidate failed to mark the mandatory Question Booklet code, holding such omission as non-rectifiable and the candidate solely responsible.
The Indian Hotels Company Limited v. Grand Vivanta Vacations Private Limited
The Delhi High Court granted permanent injunction against the Defendant's use of 'GRAND VIVANTA' mark infringing the Plaintiff's well-known 'VIVANTA' trademark, ordered domain transfer and destruction of infringing materials, and permitted the Defendant to adopt a new non-infringing name.
Colgate Palmolive Company & Anr. v. John Does & Anr.
The Delhi High Court held that customs authorities properly prevented import of toothpaste bearing a mark deceptively similar to 'COLGATE', disposing of the suit as the Intellectual Property Rights (Imported Goods) Enforcement Rules, 2007 were complied with.
PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (CENTRAL)-2 v. M/S JPM TOOLS LTD.
Delhi High Court dismissed Revenue's appeals holding that additions under Section 153A cannot be sustained without incriminating material found during search and statements without cross-examination are inadmissible.
Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax (Central)-2 v. Panchmukhi Management Services Pvt. Ltd.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the Revenue's appeals, holding that protective additions based on seized documents unrelated to the assessment years were invalid and that no incriminating material justified reopening assessments under Section 153C.
Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax (Central)-2 v. Panchmukhi Management Services Pvt. Ltd.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the Revenue's appeals, holding that protective additions under Section 153C cannot be sustained without incriminating material pertaining to the relevant assessment years and a live link to the additions made.