Delhi High Court
59,687 judgments
Rekha Kapoor v. Dr. Pawan Chandra & Anr
The Delhi High Court condoned delay in filing appeal and held that daughter-in-law claiming rights under gift deed and Will is a necessary party to be impleaded in partition suit for complete adjudication.
Bhambhi Jagdish Bhai v. Union of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court disposed of the writ petition as infructuous after the appellate authority modified the petitioner's dismissal to reduction of pay and reinstated him in service under CISF Rules.
Baljit Singh Bhatia v. Union of India
The Delhi High Court dismissed a writ petition challenging home loan EMIs on grounds that loan repayment obligations are independent of builder defaults and no RBI guideline violation or fundamental right infringement was shown.
Kuldeep & Anr. v. State of NCT of Delhi & Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 376, 506, and 34 IPC following the parties' marriage and amicable settlement, exercising its inherent power under Section 482 Cr.P.C.
Sachin Kumar v. Union of India
The Delhi High Court directed a fresh medical examination for the petitioner declared medically unfit, holding the fresh board's report final and allowing appointment if found fit.
Malook Chand Cotton and Oil Mills v. Abhishek Gupta Trading as Hariom Enterprises
The Delhi High Court granted permanent injunction against the Defendant's use of the deceptively similar mark 'DOUBLE HORN' and label, protecting the Plaintiff's longstanding 'DOUBLE HIRAN' trademark and directing withdrawal of infringing trademark and copyright applications.
M/S KISHAN LAL KURIA MAL INTERNATIONAL v. UNION OF INDIA & ORS.
The Delhi High Court allowed writ petitions directing refund of IGST paid on exports during the GST transitional period despite higher duty drawback claims, holding that statutory refund provisions override conflicting notifications and circulars.
Akash Arya v. Punjab National Bank & Ors.
The Delhi High Court set aside the appellant's removal from service for reliance on uncharged financial loss and remitted the matter for fresh punishment consideration excluding such extraneous material.
National Highway Authority of India v. Continental Engineering Corporation
The Delhi High Court dismissed NHAI's challenge to an international commercial arbitral award, upholding the tribunal's contract interpretation and limiting interference to narrow public policy grounds under Section 34(2) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.
Phillips 66 Company v. Raaj Unocal Lubricants Limited
The Delhi High Court held that a suit for recovery based on a foreign judgment relating to intellectual property rights infringement qualifies as a commercial suit and allowed condonation of delay in filing the written statement subject to costs.
Ajay Pal v. Union of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that an ex-serviceman denied appointment due to administrative delay is entitled to back wages from the date of medical fitness, overruling the absolute application of 'no work no pay'.
Consulting Engineers Group Limited v. National Highways Authority of India
The Delhi High Court held that an associate partner in a joint venture lacks authority to independently invoke arbitration or seek relief under Section 9 of the Arbitration Act without consent of the lead partner, dismissing the petition challenging debarment.
Jayanta Sakharam Keni v. Union of India
The Delhi High Court dismissed a writ petition challenging removal from CISF service due to inordinate delay and lack of satisfactory explanation for the delay in filing the petition.
V K Dewan & Co. v. Delhi Jal Board & Anr.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition for appointment of an arbitrator as barred by limitation since the claims were withdrawn earlier and no fresh cause of action arose.
Phillips 66 Company v. Raaj Unocal Lubricants Limited
The Delhi High Court held that a suit for recovery based on a US judgment for intellectual property infringement qualifies as a commercial suit under the Commercial Courts Act and allowed condonation of delay in filing the written statement subject to costs.
PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-7 v. RAJDARBAR HERITAGE VENTURE LTD.
The Delhi High Court held that interest income on disputed fixed deposits does not crystallize as taxable income under Section 5(1) of the Income Tax Act until ownership is finally determined by the Arbitral Tribunal, dismissing the tax department's appeal.
Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax-7 v. Rajdarbar Heritage Venture Ltd.
The Delhi High Court held that interest income on disputed fixed deposits does not crystallize as taxable income under Section 5(1) of the Income Tax Act until ownership is finally determined by the Arbitral Tribunal.
Principal Commissioner of Income Tax, Central Circle v. M/S Delhi International Airport Pvt. Ltd
The Delhi High Court held that Section 14A disallowance applies only if exempt income is actually received or receivable during the relevant year and dismissed the tax appeal challenging the ITAT order.
L OREAL INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED v. UNION OF INDIA & ORS.
The Delhi High Court held that the National Anti-Profiteering Authority has suo moto powers under Section 171 of the CGST Act to ensure suppliers pass on GST rate reduction benefits by way of commensurate price reduction, rejecting alternative methods like increased grammage or discounts.
Asker Ali Chengala Mallam v. Union of India & Anr.
The Delhi High Court set aside orders dismissing customs appeal and revision for delay without condonation, directing a de novo hearing on merits while imposing costs on the petitioner.