Delhi High Court

59,687 judgments

Year:

Gulzari v. State

06 Oct 2022 · Talwant Singh · 2022:DHC:4105

The High Court set aside charges under Sections 304B and 498A IPC against the petitioner due to non-establishment of a valid marriage, remanding the matter for reconsideration of charges.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Section 304B IPC Section 498A IPC dowry death live-in relationship

Sucheta v. All India Institute of Medical Science

06 Oct 2022 · Sanjeev Narula · 2022:DHC:4061
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court held that AIIMS cannot arbitrarily exclude Nursing Tutors from 'In-service' reservation for M.Sc. Nursing admission when the prospectus is silent on such distinction, setting aside the denial of admission.

administrative petition_allowed Significant In-service candidate Reservation Nursing Tutor Nursing Staff

M/S Janta Associates and Co. Ltd. v. Indian Oil Foundation & Anr.

06 Oct 2022 · Vibhu BakhrU · 2022:DHC:4050
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court held that arbitration cannot be initiated before finalization of the Final Bill containing Notified Claims as required under the contract, dismissing the petitioner’s premature arbitration petition.

civil petition_dismissed Significant Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Final Bill Notified Claims General Conditions of Contract

M/S VARUN GEMS v. M/S PRECIOUS JEWELS & ANR

06 Oct 2022 · Vibhu Bakhru; Amit Mahajan · 2022:DHC:4047-DB

The Delhi High Court allowed the appeal and granted an injunction restraining the respondents from using the name 'RAKYAN' near the appellant's business, holding that bona fide use of a name under Section 35 of the Trade Marks Act does not permit deceptive use causing confusion with a registered trademark.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Trade Marks Act 1999 Section 35 bona fide use registered trademark

South Delhi Municipal Corporation v. Pioneer Publicity Corporation Private Limited

06 Oct 2022 · Satish Chandra Sharma; Subramonium Prasad · 2022:DHC:4038-DB
Cites 0 · Cited by 3

The Delhi High Court upheld remission of licence fees paid for a dismantled unipole where the municipal corporation failed to provide a suitable alternative site, applying the principle of prevention of unjust enrichment.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant unjust enrichment licence fee remission contractual obligation alternative site allotment

HERO FINCORP LIMITED v. NATIONAL FACELESS ASSESSMENT CENTRE DELHI

06 Oct 2022 · Manmohan; Manmeet Pritam Singh Arora · 2022:DHC:4122-DB

The Delhi High Court set aside a tax assessment order for failure to serve the mandatory show cause notice with the draft assessment order under Section 144B of the Income Tax Act, remanding the matter for fresh assessment.

tax appeal_allowed Significant Income Tax Act, 1961 Section 144B show cause notice draft assessment order

Maharaja Ranjit Singh Gaekwad v. Union of India

06 Oct 2022 · Satish Chandra Sharma; The Chief Justice; Subramonium Prasad · 2022:DHC:4037-DB

The Delhi High Court dismissed appeals by the Maharaja of Baroda's heirs seeking allotment of land in lieu of Baroda House and Sirmoor Plot, holding no legal right accrued and upholding eviction under the Public Premises Act.

property appeal_dismissed Significant Instrument of Merger Private property Baroda House Sirmoor Plot

Saheb Lal v. Mahanagar Telephone Nigam Limited

06 Oct 2022 · Satish Chandra Sharma, C.J.; Hon'ble The Chief Justice; Hon'... · 2022:DHC:4036-DB

The Delhi High Court upheld the removal of a government employee convicted for corruption, ruling that criminal conviction justifies dismissal under service rules despite prior departmental exoneration.

administrative appeal_dismissed Significant criminal conviction removal from service departmental enquiry prevention of corruption

State v. Rajan & Ors.

06 Oct 2022 · Mukta Gupta; Anish Dayal · 2022:DHC:4225-DB

The Delhi High Court upheld the acquittal of accused in a murder case due to unreliable and uncorroborated sole eyewitness testimony, emphasizing the necessity of proof beyond reasonable doubt.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant eyewitness testimony contradictions reasonable doubt Section 302 IPC

Ali Humam v. Jamia Millia Islamia University & Ors.

06 Oct 2022 · Vibhu Bahru; Amit Mahajan · 2022:DHC:4065-DB

The Delhi High Court upheld Jamia Millia Islamia University's decision to withhold a student's promotion due to multiple backlogs despite delayed result declaration, dismissing the appeal challenging the same.

academic/education appeal_dismissed student promotion examination backlog Jamia Millia Islamia University Ordinance 15-C

Shamrock Geoscience Ltd v. Kaba Infratech Private Limited

06 Oct 2022 · Sanjeev Narula · 2022:DHC:4053

The Delhi High Court held that TIMAB, as prior user of the 'GeoCrete' mark, has superior rights over SHAMROCK's registration and granted injunction restraining SHAMROCK from using the mark in India.

intellectual_property appeal_allowed Significant Trade Marks Act 1999 prior use passing off interlocutory injunction

Allahabad Bank v. Chetan Gadi

30 Sep 2022 · Manmeet Pritam Singh Arora · 2023:DHC:8654
Cites 0 · Cited by 1

The Delhi High Court dismissed the bank's appeal against the execution court's refusal to adjust advance rent against use and occupation charges, upholding the payment directions in the decree.

civil appeal_dismissed execution petition use and occupation charges advance rent adjustment lease deed

Rajni Sharma v. Des Raj Sethi

30 Sep 2022 · C. Hari Shankar · 2024:DHC:1082

The Delhi High Court allowed the appellant's appeal in execution proceedings by permitting payment of the decree amount in installments and quashing attachment orders, while rejecting challenges to the arbitral award.

civil appeal_allowed execution proceedings attachment orders decree amount installment payment

J P Constructions v. Tahal Consulting Engineers India Pvt Ltd

30 Sep 2022 · C. Hari Shankar · 2024:DHC:6535
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court held that at the Section 11(6) stage, only a prima facie arbitration agreement needs to be established and appointed an arbitrator despite disputes over the petitioner's status and authority.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Section 11(6) Partnership Act, 1932 Section 69(3)

Paramjit Bajaj v. Nivedita Das & Ors.

29 Sep 2022 · C. Hari Shankar · 2024:DHC:6601

The Delhi High Court appointed an arbitrator under Section 11(5) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 to resolve disputes arising from an investment agreement where parties failed to agree on arbitrator appointment.

arbitration petition_allowed Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Section 11(5) Section 12(2) Section 21

Rajesh Kumar v. State (Govt. of NCT of Delhi) & Ors.

28 Sep 2022 · Subramonium Prasad · 2022:DHC:3987

The Delhi High Court held that the escape of minor girls from a child care institution was voluntary, emphasized the broad protective mandate of the Juvenile Justice Act, and directed systemic reforms for better functioning and oversight of child care institutions.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Juvenile Justice Act Child Care Institution Children in Need of Care and Protection Escape from Child Care Home

M/S PARAS SALES v. DELHI JAL BOARD, GOVT. OF N.C.T. OF DELHI

28 Sep 2022 · Manoj Kumar Ohri · 2022:DHC:4072

The Delhi High Court quashed the debarment order against a contractor for failure to provide a valid show cause notice and opportunity of personal hearing, emphasizing strict adherence to natural justice in blacklisting proceedings.

administrative petition_allowed Significant blacklisting debarment natural justice show cause notice

Nirma Limited v. Purnima Gupta and Anr.

28 Sep 2022 · Navin Chawla · 2022:DHC:3992
Cites 0 · Cited by 1

The Delhi High Court allowed Nirma Limited’s petition to cancel the respondent’s 'NIMA' trade mark registration in Class 14 due to deceptive similarity with petitioner’s well-known marks 'NIRMA' and 'NIMA', applying Section 11(2) of the Trade Marks Act, 1999.

intellectual_property petition_allowed Significant trade mark well-known trade mark deceptive similarity Section 11(2) Trade Marks Act

Facebook India Online Services Private Limited v. Competition Commission of India & Ors.

28 Sep 2022 · Yashwant Varma · 2022:DHC:3999

The Delhi High Court upheld the Competition Commission's administrative order directing investigation into Facebook India's data sharing practices by clubbing it with an ongoing Suo Motu case, holding that detailed reasons or separate prima facie findings against the petitioner were not required at this preliminary stage.

administrative petition_dismissed Significant Competition Commission of India Section 26(1) Competition Act prima facie opinion investigation direction

Ajay Kumar v. State (NCT of Delhi)

28 Sep 2022 · Anoop Kumar Mendiratta · 2022:DHC:4010

The Delhi High Court dismissed the bail application of a director accused of economic offences involving diversion of funds in incomplete housing projects, emphasizing the gravity of the offence and the need for strict bail scrutiny.

criminal petition_dismissed Significant bail economic offence diversion of funds Amrapali Dream Valley