Delhi High Court

95,726 judgments

Year:

GOVT. OF NCT DELHI v. VIRENDER KUMAR CHOUDHARY

19 Oct 2022 · Sanjeev Sachdeva; Tushar Rao Gedela · 2022:DHC:4411-DB

The Delhi High Court held that a candidate who qualifies CTET under OBC relaxation cannot claim eligibility for unreserved category posts, upholding cancellation of such candidature.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant CTET OBC category relaxation unreserved category eligibility cancellation of candidature

Naresh Chand Jain v. State of NCT of Delhi

19 Oct 2022 · Anoop Kumar Mendiratta · 2022:DHC:4369

The Delhi High Court held that the Supreme Court's COVID-19 suo motu orders extended the limitation period for sending legal notice under Section 138 NI Act, allowing the complaint to proceed despite delay caused by the pandemic.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Section 138 Negotiable Instruments Act limitation period extension COVID-19 pandemic legal notice

Priyanka Singh v. Bimlesh Kumari & Ors.

19 Oct 2022 · C. Hari Shankar · 2022:DHC:4551

The Delhi High Court directed the Trial Court to expeditiously decide the petitioner’s application under Order XXXIX Rule 7 CPC while recognizing pandemic-related delays and declined to impose rigid time frames generally.

civil petition_allowed Article 227 Constitution of India Order XXXIX Rule 7 CPC Order XII Rule 6 CPC time-bound disposal

M/S DWARKESH DIAMONDS PVT LTD v. KULDEEP BAKSHI

19 Oct 2022 · C. Hari Shankar · 2022:DHC:4521

The Delhi High Court held that leave to defend in a summary suit must be granted if triable issues exist, but where the defence is plausible yet improbable, conditional leave with deposit of the disputed amount is appropriate.

civil petition_allowed Significant Order XXXVII CPC leave to defend summary suit substantial defence

KRBL Limited v. Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax Circle 13(1), Delhi

19 Oct 2022 · Manmohan; Manmeet Pritam Singh Arora · 2022:DHC:4421-DB

Delhi High Court directs Revenue to issue tax refund with interest and pass appeal effect orders within six weeks following favorable ITAT and CIT(A) decisions.

tax petition_allowed Income Tax refund Appeal effect order ITAT order Article 265 Constitution

Devendra Singh v. Globe Detective Agency Pvt. Ltd.

19 Oct 2022 · Dinesh Kumar Sharma · 2022:DHC:4446

The Delhi High Court dismissed the writ petition challenging the Labour Court’s rejection of illegal termination claim where the petitioner admitted non-termination and refusal to comply with transfer.

labor petition_dismissed illegal termination transfer order labour court writ jurisdiction

Bhopal Singh v. Urmila Devi & Anr

19 Oct 2022 · Dinesh Kumar Sharma · 2022/DHC/004405

The Delhi High Court allowed the husband's appeal and granted divorce on the ground of irretrievable breakdown of marriage and mental cruelty despite adultery not being proved.

family appeal_allowed Significant Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 divorce mental cruelty irretrievable breakdown of marriage

Aero Club v. Bhawna Trading Co. & Anr.

19 Oct 2022 · Prathiba M. Singh · 2022:DHC:4409

The Delhi High Court granted permanent injunction and damages against defendants for infringement of the registered trademark 'WOODLAND', decreeing the suit ex-parte against one defendant and recording a settlement with the other.

civil appeal_allowed Significant trademark infringement permanent injunction passing off ex-parte proceedings

Rajesh Sharma v. Kusum Lata

19 Oct 2022 · C. Hari Shankar · 2022:DHC:4500

The Delhi High Court held that an application for leave to defend filed within time but before the wrong court due to inadvertent error must be treated as timely, and procedural mistakes should not defeat the right to defend in eviction proceedings.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Delhi Rent Control Act application for leave to defend eviction petition condonation of delay

Triloki v. Ashok Hotel

19 Oct 2022 · Dinesh Kumar Sharma · 2022:DHC:4508

The Delhi High Court upheld illegal termination of a contractual employee but modified the award to enhance compensation in lieu of reinstatement, emphasizing the judicial trend favoring compensation over reinstatement in such cases.

labor appeal_allowed Significant Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 Section 25-F Section 25-FF reinstatement

M/S JIWAN AUTO PRIVATE LIMITED v. COMMISSIONER OF VAT & ANR.

19 Oct 2022 · Rajiv Shakdher; Tara Vitasta Ganju · 2022:DHC:4513-DB

The Delhi High Court directed payment of undisputed VAT refund with interest from the date petitioner was intimated to pursue the claim, rejecting the petitioner's request to limit interest to three years.

tax petition_allowed statutory interest refund claim Delhi VAT delay in refund

Rakesh Kumar Bhola v. Directorate of Revenue Intelligence Headquarters, New Delhi

19 Oct 2022 · Purushaindra Kumar Kaurav · 2022:DHC:4413
Cites 7 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court granted regular bail to an accused under the NDPS Act due to prolonged trial delay violating his right to speedy trial, balancing stringent bail conditions with constitutional liberty.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant NDPS Act Section 37 NDPS bail speedy trial

KRBL LIMITED v. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CIRCLE 13(1) & ORS

19 Oct 2022 · Manmohan; Manmeet Pritam Singh Arora · 2022:DHC:4419-DB

The Delhi High Court directed the Revenue to pass appeal effect orders and release refunds with interest to the petitioner pursuant to the ITAT order, emphasizing statutory compliance and constitutional mandates.

tax petition_allowed Income Tax Appellate Tribunal appeal effect order refund interest

M/S DWARKESH DIAMONDS PVT LTD v. URMIL BAKSHI

19 Oct 2022 · C. Hari Shankar · 2022:DHC:4482

The Delhi High Court held that leave to defend in a summary suit must be granted unless the defence is frivolous, and where the defence is plausible but improbable, conditional leave with deposit may be imposed.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Order XXXVII Rule 3(5) CPC leave to defend summary suit plausible defence

Ram Karan v. Union of India and Anr.

19 Oct 2022 · Rekha Palli · 2022:DHC:4401
Cites 0 · Cited by 1

The Delhi High Court held that compassionate appointment is a humanitarian concession, not a right, and dismissed the petition seeking such appointment after a long delay and in absence of available vacancies.

administrative petition_dismissed Significant compassionate appointment public employment humanitarian concession vacancy

Bharat v. The State

19 Oct 2022 · Purushaindra Kumar Kaurav · 2022:DHC:4418

The Delhi High Court granted bail to the accused in a POCSO case involving a minor niece, holding that consent of a minor is immaterial but bail is permissible after completion of investigation and filing of chargesheet under appropriate conditions.

criminal appeal_allowed bail Section 439 Cr.P.C. minor consent POCSO Act

Kaushalya Devi v. The State (Govt. of NCT of Delhi)

19 Oct 2022 · Swarana Kanta Sharma
Cites 2 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court upheld the trial court's discharge of accused from murder charges due to lack of prima facie evidence while affirming dowry-related charges against the husband, emphasizing the limited scope of charge framing and the need for further investigation if warranted.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant framing of charge discharge Section 302 IPC Section 304B IPC

Surjeet Kaur v. Sardar Raja Singh Oberoi & Ors.

19 Oct 2022 · Neena Bansal Krishna · 2022:DHC:4362

The Delhi High Court held that a secured creditor under the SARFAESI Act is neither a necessary nor proper party in a partition suit and dismissed the application for its impleadment.

civil petition_dismissed Significant Partition Suit Impleadment SARFAESI Act, 2002 Section 34 SARFAESI

MUFG BANK LTD v. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CIRCLE 2

19 Oct 2022 · Manmohan; Manmeet Pritam Singh Arora

The Delhi High Court directed income tax authorities to comply with ITAT and High Court orders by passing appeal effect orders and issuing refunds to MUFG Bank Ltd within six weeks.

tax petition_allowed Income Tax Appellate Tribunal appeal effect order refund Section 153(5) Income Tax Act

Bharat Construction Co Ltd v. Engineering Project India Ltd

19 Oct 2022 · Dinesh Kumar Sharma · 2022:DHC:4447

The Delhi High Court allowed transfer of arbitration-related petitions to a single court to avoid parallel proceedings and conflicting judgments.

civil other arbitration transfer of cases parallel proceedings conflicting judgments