Delhi High Court

95,375 judgments

Year:

RMS Fire and Safety Services Pvt. Ltd. v. ISPL Automation Pvt Ltd

11 Nov 2022 · Prathiba M. Singh · 2022:DHC:4805

The Delhi High Court dismissed the appeal for lack of territorial jurisdiction, holding that patent appeals under Section 117A must be filed in the High Court having jurisdiction over the appropriate patent office where the application originated.

intellectual_property appeal_dismissed Significant patent revocation territorial jurisdiction appropriate office Section 117A Patents Act

P.K. Jain v. Directorate of Education and Anr

11 Nov 2022 · Chandra Dhari Singh · 2022:DHC:4747

The Delhi High Court upheld that probation under Rule 105 of DSEAR is limited to two years with mandatory Director's approval for extension, and termination without due process after this period is illegal, warranting reinstatement.

labor appeal_dismissed Significant probation period deemed confirmation Rule 105 Delhi School Education Act termination during probation

Gyan Prakash v. Delhi Transco Ltd.

11 Nov 2022 · Anu Malhotra · 2022:DHC:4772

The Delhi High Court upheld compulsory retirement imposed on an employee for failing to secure computer systems leading to financial loss, dismissing claims of mala fide and improper procedure.

administrative petition_dismissed Significant compulsory retirement departmental inquiry dereliction of duty security measures

G. S. Shergill v. Delhi State Civil Supplies Corporation Ltd.

11 Nov 2022 · Chandra Dhari Singh · 2022:DHC:4744

The Delhi High Court quashed delayed disciplinary proceedings against a senior officer due to unexplained delay causing prejudice, emphasizing prompt initiation of such proceedings and adherence to natural justice.

administrative petition_allowed Significant disciplinary proceedings delay in charge sheet natural justice prejudice

Hamdard National Foundation (India) v. Amazon India Limited

11 Nov 2022 · Prathiba M. Singh · 2022:DHC:4807

The Delhi High Court granted permanent injunction against unauthorized sale of 'ROOH AFZA' products on Amazon.in, directing removal of infringing listings and disclosure of seller details to protect trademark rights and consumers.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Trademark infringement E-commerce intermediary liability ROOH AFZA Permanent injunction

Ricky Arora and Another v. Jagjit Singh Sahwney and Ors.

11 Nov 2022 · C. Hari Shankar · 2022:DHC:4819

The Delhi High Court upheld the impleadment of the deceased tenant's spouse in eviction proceedings under Order XXII Rule 4 CPC and dismissed the petition challenging it as withdrawn with liberty to file appropriate applications.

civil appeal_dismissed impleadment legal representatives Order XXII Rule 4 CPC Order I Rule 10 CPC

Simran Sodhi v. Sandeep Singh

11 Nov 2022 · V. Kameswar Rao, J · 2022:DHC:4740
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court held that disputes between partners under a valid arbitration clause are arbitrable and ordered appointment of an arbitrator, but refused to include a non-signatory company in arbitration, clarifying the limits of the Doctrine of Group of Companies and the arbitrability of fraud allegations.

civil appeal_allowed Significant arbitration agreement partnership dispute Doctrine of Group of Companies non-signatory arbitration

Devender Kumar v. State (NCT of Delhi)

11 Nov 2022 · Mukta Gupta; Anish Dayal · 2022:DHC:4783-DB
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court upheld the appellant's conviction for murder based on reliable last seen evidence, circumstantial proof, and failure to explain the disappearance of the victim and vehicle.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant last seen theory circumstantial evidence identification parade post mortem report

Anil Rathi & Ors. v. Jaipur Steeltech India Pvt Ltd & Ors.

11 Nov 2022 · Jyoti Singh · CS(COMM) 961/2018

The Delhi High Court decreed the suit restraining defendants from using the trademark "RATHI" without a valid license, based on binding undertakings and cancellation of the license by the trademark owner.

civil appeal_allowed trademark license trade mark RATHI Trust Rathi Foundation Memorandum of Understanding

H.S. Sahni v. Mukul Singhal & Ors.

11 Nov 2022 · Vibhu Bahkru; Amit Mahajan · 2022:DHC:4786-DB

The Delhi High Court upheld the stay of a commercial suit under Section 10 CPC to avoid multiplicity of litigation where an earlier suit involving the same trademark dispute was pending.

civil appeal_dismissed Section 10 CPC stay of suit multiplicity of litigation trademark dispute

Umesh Cimechel Consortium v. IIC Limited & Anr.

11 Nov 2022 · Anup Jairam Bhambhani · 2022:DHC:5163

The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition seeking to compel arbitration against a non-signatory party, holding that no valid arbitration agreement or invocation notice existed with respondent No. 2.

arbitration petition_dismissed Significant arbitration agreement non-signatory party alter-ego group of companies doctrine

Vikram Kapur & Anr. v. M/s Atlas Cycles (Haryana) Ltd.

11 Nov 2022 · Anu Malhotra · 2022:DHC:4796

The Delhi High Court upheld the summoning of petitioners for criminal breach of trust and related offences for unauthorized payment of rent from company funds, dismissing their petition to quash the complaint.

criminal petition_dismissed Significant criminal breach of trust unauthorized payment management committee board resolution

Hem Chander Khatri v. District Magistrate North

11 Nov 2022 · Chandra Dhari Singh · 2022:DHC:4828

The Delhi High Court dismissed the writ petition challenging rejection of alternative plot allotment under the Scheme of 1961, holding that ownership of residential property in village abadi area disqualifies entitlement and non-submission of documents justifies rejection.

administrative petition_dismissed Significant Land Acquisition Act 1894 Scheme of 1961 Alternative plot allotment Village abadi area

Shri Ramesh Chander Goel v. Master Chirag Goel

11 Nov 2022 · Neena Bansal Krishna · 2022:DHC:4760

The Delhi High Court decreed recovery of loan amounts with interest against defendants who failed to prove the sums were gifts, affirming jurisdiction and awarding interest at 6% per annum.

civil appeal_allowed Significant loan recovery gift vs loan interest on loan territorial jurisdiction

Municipal Corporation of Delhi v. Deputy Labour Commissioner & Ors.

11 Nov 2022 · Dinesh Kumar Sharma · 2022:DHC:4842

The Delhi High Court directed fresh adjudication of pay arrears claims by MCD employees, setting aside unauthorized statements by a senior officer and staying recovery certificates pending Labour Court's decision.

labor appeal_dismissed Significant Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 Section 33-C(2) regularization pay fixation

Faim @ Fahim v. Commissioner Employees Compensation & Ors.

11 Nov 2022 · C. Hari Shankar · 2022 ACJ 2327

The Delhi High Court held that territorial jurisdiction under the Employee’s Compensation Act includes the local limits where the insurance company has a business office, allowing the petitioner’s compensation claim to proceed despite the accident occurring outside the Commissioner’s territorial jurisdiction.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant Employee’s Compensation Act, 1923 territorial jurisdiction insurance company compensation claim

M/S. NATIONAL PROJECTS CONSTRUCTION CORPORATION LTD. v. M/S. KONKAN RAILWAY CORPORATION LTD.

11 Nov 2022 · Neena Bansal Krishna · 2022:DHC:4762

The Delhi High Court terminated the mandate of a non-functioning arbitral tribunal due to arbitrators' ineligibility and refusal to accept agreed fees, appointing a retired Supreme Court judge as sole arbitrator to ensure expeditious dispute resolution.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Section 12 disclosure Section 14 termination of mandate Section 15 substitution of arbitrator

Dhanalakshmi Srinivasan Medical College and Hospital v. Union of India

11 Nov 2022 · Sanjeev Narula · 2022:DHC:4793
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court allowed the petition directing NMC to permit Dhanalakshmi Srinivasan Medical College to increase MBBS intake to 250 seats for 2022-23, holding that alleged deficiencies were within permissible limits and denial was arbitrary.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant Medical College Admission Capacity National Medical Commission MARB Inspection Faculty Deficiency

B. Vasudeva Rao v. Union of India and Anr.

11 Nov 2022 · Vibhu Bakhru; Amit Mahajan · 2022:DHC:4867-DB
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court held that non-supply of Inquiry Report before imposing major penalty requires proof of prejudice and that enhancement of penalty by appellate authority mandates prior opportunity of hearing, remanding the matter for fresh consideration.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant Inquiry Report Natural Justice Disciplinary Proceedings Major Penalty

Mahesh Kumar & Ors. v. Raj Kumar & Anr.

11 Nov 2022 · Dinesh Kumar Sharma · 2022:DHC:4968

The Delhi High Court condoned a 10-day delay, directed the trial court to consider a certified judgment on record, and reduced the costs imposed on the petitioners, disposing of the civil revision petition accordingly.

civil appeal_dismissed condonation of delay civil revision petition certified copy of judgment trial court