Delhi High Court
95,375 judgments
Surat Singh v. District Magistrate (North)
The Delhi High Court dismissed the writ petition challenging rejection of alternative plot allotment, holding that partial land acquisition and failure to submit documents after notice disentitle the petitioner under the 1961 Scheme.
Dr. B R Ambedkar Institute of Dental Science and Hospital v. Union of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court upheld the Central Government's withdrawal of recognition of a dental college following expert inspections confirming deficiencies, emphasizing limited judicial interference in expert administrative decisions under the Dentists Act.
Public Works Department v. Sh. Mohinder Singh & Anr.
The Delhi High Court allowed the petitioner to file a delayed appeal against a gratuity payment order, stayed recovery proceedings, and awarded litigation expenses to the respondent.
Cholamandalam MS General Insurance Co Ltd v. Sandesh Kumar & Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the insurer's appeal and upheld the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal's award of compensation to the claimant for injuries caused by the insured vehicle's negligence.
Public Works Department v. Smt. Ganga Bai & Anr.
Delhi High Court condoned delay and allowed petitioner to file appeal against gratuity payment order, stayed recovery proceedings, and awarded litigation expenses to respondent.
Mehroon Nisha v. Bedo
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition challenging the closure of plaintiff’s evidence and held that Order XVIII Rule 17 CPC applies only to recalling already examined witnesses, refusing to interfere under Article 227 against repeated defaults in leading evidence.
Kailash Devi v. Tej Pal & Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that a remand order setting aside a trial court's entire judgment requires fresh consideration of all issues, and restricting the remand to select issues is perverse and unlawful.
Public Works Department v. Sh. Raja Ram & Anr.
The Delhi High Court allowed the petitioner to file a delayed appeal against the gratuity payment order, stayed recovery proceedings, and directed payment of litigation expenses.
Jaguar Singh Chandel v. Union of India
The Delhi High Court directed the respondents to consider and grant pro-rata pension with arrears and interest to the petitioner if found eligible, relying on established pension rules and precedent.
The Commissioner of Income Tax - International Taxation -3 v. Radisson Hotel Interaction Incorporated
The Delhi High Court dismissed the Revenue's appeal, upholding that payments for centralized services do not constitute fees for technical services under the Income Tax Act or Indo-US DTAA, following binding precedent from Sheraton International Inc.
Mohd. Afzal Khan v. Faiz Ahmed @ Fazi
The Delhi High Court declined to fix a timeframe for deciding a pending interlocutory application but requested the trial court to decide it expeditiously on the next listing.
Umar Daraz v. Union of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that an employee's movement from Class-IV to Class-III post after a selection test under departmental quota is a promotion, not direct recruitment, and thus not entitled to the third MACP benefit.
Bikramjit Singh v. State
The Delhi High Court upheld the appellant's conviction for murder based on circumstantial evidence including possession of the deceased's mobile phone and recovery of the weapon, applying presumptions under Sections 106 and 114 of the Indian Evidence Act.
Anand Kohli & Anr. v. Sunaina Singh
The Delhi High Court held the respondent guilty of contempt for dishonouring post-dated cheques given pursuant to a court order and sentenced her to three months' imprisonment.
Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax-1 v. M/S Conwood Medipharma Pvt. Ltd.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the Revenue's appeal upholding the ITAT's deletion of addition to income based on unexplained bank receipts, emphasizing that concurrent factual findings supported by evidence and natural justice principles cannot be disturbed without substantial question of law.
Rajeev Rawat v. State NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition to quash FIR No. 57/2022, holding that earlier observations on territorial jurisdiction and misuse of process do not bar investigation at the initial stage.
Omesh Jain v. Income Tax Officer Ward 46(1), Delhi
The Delhi High Court dismissed the writ petition challenging an ex-parte order under Section 148A(d) of the Income Tax Act, directing the revenue to supply incriminating material and allowing the petitioner to make submissions before the Assessing Officer.
Kamruddin v. State (NCT of Delhi)
The Delhi High Court set aside the conviction under the NDPS Act due to non-compliance with Section 50, holding that the accused must be informed of his legal right to be searched in the presence of a Gazetted Officer or Magistrate.
Dr. Reddys Laboratories Limited & Anr. v. The Controller of Patents & Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that revocation petitions under Section 64 of the Patents Act, 1970 are maintainable in any High Court where cause of action arises, while appeals under Section 117A lie only before the High Court having jurisdiction over the Patent Office that passed the order.
Vishnu Bhagat v. The Controlling Authority under Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972 and Anr
The Delhi High Court held that under Rule 11(5) of the Payment of Gratuity Rules, a dismissed claim application can be restored if good cause is shown within thirty days, emphasizing adjudication on merits and natural justice.