Delhi High Court
59,941 judgments
Anjali @ Pushpa v. Dinesh Kumar
The Delhi High Court set aside an ex-parte order and the dismissal of the application to recall it, subject to costs, allowing the petitioner to participate in further proceedings.
Inderpreet Singh v. Chandeep Singh
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition challenging removal of the written statement filed beyond 120 days in a commercial suit, emphasizing the mandatory limitation period and directing the trial court to consider pending applications on service issues.
Sanjeev Kumar Kulshrestha v. Union of India
The Delhi High Court dismissed a petition challenging examination marking errors as the alleged mistakes did not affect the final result, rendering judicial intervention academic.
Mittal International v. The Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax Circle
The Delhi High Court set aside the impugned order and notice issued on a deactivated PAN, directing the petitioner to file a supplementary reply and the Assessing Officer to pass a fresh order ensuring procedural fairness under the Income Tax Act.
Public Works Department v. Bhagwati & Anr.
The Delhi High Court allowed the petitioner to file a delayed appeal against a gratuity payment order, condoned the delay, stayed recovery proceedings, and awarded litigation expenses to the respondent.
Amit Jain v. Canara Bank & Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that invocation of pledge of dematerialized shares without prior intimation is valid if permitted by agreement and SEBI regulations, and combined notice of invocation and intent to sell constitutes reasonable notice under Section 176 of the Indian Contracts Act, 1872, vacating the plaintiff's ex parte injunction against sale of pledged shares and surrender of assigned LIC policies.
INDIANA OPHTHALMICS v. SAPIENT LABORATORIES (P) LTD
The Delhi High Court upheld the Trial Court’s refusal to grant an interim injunction to a prior user against a registered proprietor of a deceptively similar trademark derived from a non-proprietary name, emphasizing the need for evidence of goodwill and distinctiveness.
Mukesh Kumar and Anr. v. Ankit Pasricha and Anr.
The Delhi High Court recorded a settlement between parties in a property dispute, set aside the prior order, and disposed of the appeal accordingly.
H. S. Sahni v. Mukul Singhal & Anr.
The Delhi High Court upheld the prior user rights of M.G. Cables over the trademark "M.G. Cable" and extended injunctions restraining M.K. Auto Sales from using deceptively similar marks "M.G." and "M.G.I." pending rectification proceedings.
M/S. Hindustan Antibiotics Ltd. v. R.S. Bhasin
The Delhi High Court held that absence of formal offer and acceptance precludes automatic confirmation after training, denying back wages but affirming reinstatement for a terminated trainee employee.
Shri Kishan Yadav v. State (NCT of Delhi)
The Delhi High Court acquitted the appellant in a kidnapping and sexual offence case due to failure of prosecution to prove the victim's age and absence of force or deceit in her voluntary accompaniment.
Public Works Department v. Punia and Anr.
The Delhi High Court allowed the petitioner to file a delayed appeal against a gratuity payment order, condoned the delay, stayed recovery proceedings, and awarded litigation expenses to the respondent.
M/S. Hindustan Antibiotics Ltd. v. Sandeep Gupta
The Delhi High Court held that automatic confirmation after training expiry requires formal offer and acceptance, denied back wages due to gainful employment, and partly allowed the writ petition modifying the Labour Court award.
Rupa Jha v. Union of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court directed the respondents to consider and grant pro-rata pension with interest to the petitioner, widow of an ex-IAF employee, in line with established legal precedents and pension rules.
Ankit Mishra v. Santosh Sharma & Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed objections by a non-party claiming rights on a temple property, holding that execution courts cannot entertain new disputes or claims lacking locus standi and that private land with a temple does not vest in the deity absent public temple status.
Cluster Overseas Private Limited v. Income Tax Officer Ward 6(1) Delhi
The Delhi High Court held that the date of issuance of a Section 148 notice is the actual dispatch date, set aside an assessment order passed without opportunity to respond, and clarified reassessment procedures pre- and post-amendment.
Krishan Chand Garg v. Nidhi Garg
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition challenging the order of summoning under the Domestic Violence Act, holding that the appellate court's detailed reasoning sufficed despite the Magistrate's brief order.
International Tractors Ltd. v. Dy. Commissioner of Income Tax (LTU) & Anr.
The Delhi High Court held that the CIT(A) can entertain fresh claims under Section 250(4) of the Income Tax Act without remanding to the Assessing Officer unless perversity is shown, thereby setting aside the ITAT's remand order and sustaining the deductions allowed.
Ram Kripal Singh Construction Pvt. Ltd. v. NTPC
The Delhi High Court held that invalidity of the agreed procedure for appointment of arbitrator under the arbitration clause does not invalidate the entire arbitration agreement and appointed an independent arbitrator under Section 11 of the Arbitration & Conciliation Act, 1996.
Vikram Bhatnagar v. Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax
The Delhi High Court held that income tax notices and assessments issued in the name of a deceased assessee without involving legal heirs are invalid and set aside the impugned proceedings.