Delhi High Court
95,375 judgments
SOHA ASSOCIATES v. UNION OF INDIA & ORS
The Delhi High Court held that summons issued by a statutory authority were no longer effective and directed the authority to decide the pending revocation application expeditiously, disposing of the writ petition accordingly.
Anand Kohli & Anr. v. Sunaina Singh
The Delhi High Court dismissed the review petition and upheld the finding of contempt against the respondent for dishonouring post-dated cheques issued under court directions, holding that withdrawal of the civil suit does not extinguish such liability.
Madurai Tuticorin Expressways Ltd. v. National Highways Authority of India
The Delhi High Court held that the Arbitral Tribunal's mandate expired on 17.01.2020 as per the Supreme Court's binding order, dismissed the extension petition by NHAI, and rejected MTEL's request for substitution of the arbitrator.
Public Works Department v. Smt. Rani & Anr.
The Delhi High Court condoned delay in filing an appeal against a gratuity payment order, stayed recovery proceedings, and directed the petitioner to pay litigation expenses, emphasizing the Appellate Authority's jurisdiction to reconsider the matter.
Sumit Gupta v. Prema Gupta
The Delhi High Court upheld the trial court’s order allowing pre-trial amendment of the plaint under Order VI Rule 17 CPC to challenge rival title claims, emphasizing a liberal approach to amendments necessary to decide the real controversy.
Public Works Department v. Anto Devi & Anr.
The Delhi High Court allowed the petitioner to file a delayed appeal against the gratuity payment order, stayed recovery proceedings, and awarded litigation expenses to the respondent.
Hariom Gupta v. Multi Speciality Extrusions P. Ltd
The Delhi High Court held that a written statement filed within the Supreme Court's COVID-19 extension of limitation period cannot be struck off as belated, remanding procedural compliance issues to the trial court for fresh consideration.
State v. Abuzar@Rahil
The Delhi High Court upheld the acquittal of the accused in a rape case due to incomplete cross-examination of the prosecutrix and inconclusive DNA evidence, emphasizing the necessity of complete evidence to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt.
M/S Whitefields Overseas Ltd. & Anr. v. M/S DIAT Agro Holdings Pvt. Ltd.
The Delhi High Court upheld summons under Section 138 NI Act against the company and managing director, rejecting double jeopardy claims and clarifying that each dishonored cheque constitutes a separate cause of action.
MS. JXXXX v. THE STATE & ANR
The Delhi High Court set aside bail order directions mandating lie detector tests on accused and complainant post-investigation, holding such directions legally impermissible.
Public Works Department v. Sh. Badle Ram & Anr.
The Delhi High Court allowed the petitioner to file a delayed appeal against a gratuity payment order, stayed recovery proceedings, and awarded litigation expenses to the respondent.
Anjali @ Pushpa v. Dinesh Kumar
The Delhi High Court set aside an ex-parte order and the dismissal of the application to recall it, subject to costs, allowing the petitioner to participate in further proceedings.
Inderpreet Singh v. Chandeep Singh
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition challenging removal of the written statement filed beyond 120 days in a commercial suit, emphasizing the mandatory limitation period and directing the trial court to consider pending applications on service issues.
Sanjeev Kumar Kulshrestha v. Union of India
The Delhi High Court dismissed a petition challenging examination marking errors as the alleged mistakes did not affect the final result, rendering judicial intervention academic.
Mittal International v. The Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax Circle
The Delhi High Court set aside the impugned order and notice issued on a deactivated PAN, directing the petitioner to file a supplementary reply and the Assessing Officer to pass a fresh order ensuring procedural fairness under the Income Tax Act.
Public Works Department v. Bhagwati & Anr.
The Delhi High Court allowed the petitioner to file a delayed appeal against a gratuity payment order, condoned the delay, stayed recovery proceedings, and awarded litigation expenses to the respondent.
Amit Jain v. Canara Bank & Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that invocation of pledge of dematerialized shares without prior intimation is valid if permitted by agreement and SEBI regulations, and combined notice of invocation and intent to sell constitutes reasonable notice under Section 176 of the Indian Contracts Act, 1872, vacating the plaintiff's ex parte injunction against sale of pledged shares and surrender of assigned LIC policies.
INDIANA OPHTHALMICS v. SAPIENT LABORATORIES (P) LTD
The Delhi High Court upheld the Trial Court’s refusal to grant an interim injunction to a prior user against a registered proprietor of a deceptively similar trademark derived from a non-proprietary name, emphasizing the need for evidence of goodwill and distinctiveness.
Mukesh Kumar and Anr. v. Ankit Pasricha and Anr.
The Delhi High Court recorded a settlement between parties in a property dispute, set aside the prior order, and disposed of the appeal accordingly.
H. S. Sahni v. Mukul Singhal & Anr.
The Delhi High Court upheld the prior user rights of M.G. Cables over the trademark "M.G. Cable" and extended injunctions restraining M.K. Auto Sales from using deceptively similar marks "M.G." and "M.G.I." pending rectification proceedings.