Delhi High Court
59,941 judgments
Sajal Das & Ors. v. Union of India and Ors.
The Delhi High Court directed the respondents to complete the pay re-fixation exercise for promotees in paramilitary forces within four months, disposing of the writ petition with liberty to challenge the final decision.
Nitish Jaiswal v. Ram Kishore Tyagi
The Delhi High Court upheld the grant of unconditional leave to defend in a summary suit where the defendant raised bona fide triable issues and the plaintiff failed to produce documentary evidence supporting the claimed sale consideration.
LT Foods Limited v. Saraswati Trading Company
Delhi High Court granted permanent injunction and damages to LT Foods Limited against Saraswati Trading Company for counterfeit use of 'DAWAT' trademark and upheld the admissibility of Local Commissioner's report as evidence.
M/S BEST MARINE PRIVATE LTD v. COMMISSIONER OF VAT & ANR.
The Delhi High Court directed rectification of VAT returns under Section 74B of the DVAT Act subject to merits and stayed the direction pending Supreme Court appeals.
Indu Rani @ Indu Rathi v. Raghvinder Mann & Anr.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the application seeking correction of partition measurements, holding that the final decree of partition by metes and bounds is binding and not subject to modification by interlocutory application.
The Press Trust of India Limited v. PTI Employees Union
The Delhi High Court dismissed the writ petition challenging the National Industrial Tribunal's order, holding that premature interference is impermissible absent manifest illegality.
Tasawwur Hussain v. Directorate of Revenue Intelligence
The Delhi High Court granted bail to a petitioner detained for over seven years under the NDPS Act, applying Supreme Court guidelines balancing prolonged incarceration against the stringent bail embargo under Section 37.
FMC Corporation & Ors. v. Insecticides India Limited
The Delhi High Court held that the defendant’s process lacking the essential sulfonyl chloride reagent does not infringe the plaintiffs’ process patent IN’645, dismissing the interim injunction application.
Shri Ramesh Chander Goel v. Master Chirag Goel
The Delhi High Court decreed recovery of personal loan amounts with interest against defendants who failed to prove the sums were gifts, affirming the plaintiff's entitlement to repayment.
RMS Fire and Safety Services Pvt. Ltd. v. ISPL Automation Pvt Ltd
The Delhi High Court dismissed the appeal for lack of territorial jurisdiction, holding that patent appeals under Section 117A must be filed in the High Court having jurisdiction over the appropriate patent office where the application originated.
P.K. Jain v. Directorate of Education and Anr
The Delhi High Court upheld that probation under Rule 105 of DSEAR is limited to two years with mandatory Director's approval for extension, and termination without due process after this period is illegal, warranting reinstatement.
Gyan Prakash v. Delhi Transco Ltd.
The Delhi High Court upheld compulsory retirement imposed on an employee for failing to secure computer systems leading to financial loss, dismissing claims of mala fide and improper procedure.
G. S. Shergill v. Delhi State Civil Supplies Corporation Ltd.
The Delhi High Court quashed delayed disciplinary proceedings against a senior officer due to unexplained delay causing prejudice, emphasizing prompt initiation of such proceedings and adherence to natural justice.
Hamdard National Foundation (India) v. Amazon India Limited
The Delhi High Court granted permanent injunction against unauthorized sale of 'ROOH AFZA' products on Amazon.in, directing removal of infringing listings and disclosure of seller details to protect trademark rights and consumers.
Ricky Arora and Another v. Jagjit Singh Sahwney and Ors.
The Delhi High Court upheld the impleadment of the deceased tenant's spouse in eviction proceedings under Order XXII Rule 4 CPC and dismissed the petition challenging it as withdrawn with liberty to file appropriate applications.
Simran Sodhi v. Sandeep Singh
The Delhi High Court held that disputes between partners under a valid arbitration clause are arbitrable and ordered appointment of an arbitrator, but refused to include a non-signatory company in arbitration, clarifying the limits of the Doctrine of Group of Companies and the arbitrability of fraud allegations.
Devender Kumar v. State (NCT of Delhi)
The Delhi High Court upheld the appellant's conviction for murder based on reliable last seen evidence, circumstantial proof, and failure to explain the disappearance of the victim and vehicle.
Anil Rathi & Ors. v. Jaipur Steeltech India Pvt Ltd & Ors.
The Delhi High Court decreed the suit restraining defendants from using the trademark "RATHI" without a valid license, based on binding undertakings and cancellation of the license by the trademark owner.
H.S. Sahni v. Mukul Singhal & Ors.
The Delhi High Court upheld the stay of a commercial suit under Section 10 CPC to avoid multiplicity of litigation where an earlier suit involving the same trademark dispute was pending.
Umesh Cimechel Consortium v. IIC Limited & Anr.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition seeking to compel arbitration against a non-signatory party, holding that no valid arbitration agreement or invocation notice existed with respondent No. 2.