Delhi High Court
59,941 judgments
Surjeet Singh Virdi v. Jasvinder Singh Bitto Chaudhary
The Delhi High Court directed the trial court to reconsider the refusal to take the written statement on record due to alleged incomplete service of summons, allowing the petitioner to file a review petition and deferring further proceedings.
Raju @ Kristo v. State
The Delhi High Court held that the appellant was a juvenile at the time of the offence based on medical age determination, set aside the sentence while maintaining conviction under Sections 302 and 452 IPC, and granted the benefit of juvenility retrospectively.
Mohammad Shahid v. DTTE, Govt. of NCTD and Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that the reserve list for recruitment is valid only for two years from the final result notification, and no recommendation can be made thereafter, dismissing the petitioner’s claim for appointment beyond this period.
Deere and Company & Anr. v. Jitender Kumar Gaur & Anr.
The Delhi High Court granted summary judgment in favor of Deere & Company against defendants selling counterfeit engine oil products bearing its well-known 'JOHN DEERE' and 'TORQ-GARD' trademarks, issuing permanent injunctions and awarding costs.
BOLT TECHNOLOGY OU v. UJOY TECHNOLOGY PRIVATE LIMITED & ANR
The Delhi High Court directed the defendants to modify their 'BOLT' mark to 'BOLT.EARTH' pending final hearing in a trademark infringement and passing off suit filed by Bolt Technology OU.
M/S AWADH CONSTRUCTION v. M/S AMAARPREET SHUTTERING
The Delhi High Court allowed recall of the complainant for further cross-examination under Section 311 Cr.P.C due to insufficient time to prepare, emphasizing the court's discretion to ensure a just decision.
Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax -12 v. Karuna Garg
The Delhi High Court upheld the ITAT's deletion of unexplained credit additions under Section 68 read with Section 115BBE, holding that suspicion alone without cogent evidence cannot sustain tax additions on alleged bogus LTCG transactions.
Garima Khera v. Anmol Khera
The Delhi High Court allowed transfer of a Domestic Violence complaint to the Family Court where a related maintenance petition is pending to ensure consistent adjudication and avoid contradictory decisions.
Nilofar Singh v. Pramod Dang & Ors.
The Delhi High Court allowed the Plaintiff's applications to implead Mr. O.P. Manchanda and M/s ASG Securities Pvt. Limited as necessary parties under Order I Rule 10 CPC, holding that limitation and disputed factual issues cannot be decided at the impleadment stage.
Ram Sharma v. Ashok Kumar Sharma; Shyam Sharma; Anuradha Sharma
The Delhi High Court dismissed an application to set aside a compromise decree on grounds of fraud, holding that such decrees are binding unless valid compromise is disproved and ownership of immovable property requires registered sale deeds.
Rajat Agarwal v. Deputy Commissioner of Police Traffic
The Delhi High Court held that an order rejecting the plaint under Order VII Rule 11(d) CPC is a decree and only appeal under Section 96 CPC is maintainable, dismissing the revision petition under Section 115 CPC.
Chimes Aviation Private Limited v. United India Insurance Company Limited
The Delhi High Court held it lacks territorial jurisdiction under Section 11 of the Arbitration & Conciliation Act, 1996 to appoint an arbitrator as the arbitration clause in the insurance policy designates London as the seat and English law as governing law.
Amandeep Singh v. Pradeep Kumar
The Delhi High Court dismissed the appeal challenging a suit decree under Order XXXVII CPC, holding that failure to deposit conditional security justified granting judgment to the plaintiff where the defendant's defence was plausible but improbable.
Raj Kumar v. Government of National Capital Territory of Delhi
The Delhi High Court held that under the 1961 Scheme, only persons whose entire land has been acquired are eligible for alternative plot allotment, dismissing the petition of a partially affected landowner.
Dhanwanti @ Dhanpati & Anr. v. The State & Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition seeking quashing of an FIR for theft of a mobile phone, holding that return of the stolen phone and complainant's willingness to proceed do not justify quashing under Section 482 Cr.P.C.
ABB Limited v. Commissioner VAT Delhi
The Delhi High Court held that input tax credit under the DVAT Act, 2004 can only be claimed for the tax period in which the turnover or purchase arises, as determined by the consideration received or receivable, and not based solely on the date of tax invoices or subsequent reimbursement arrangements.
HANS STUDY CENTER v. UNION OF INDIA & ANR
The Delhi High Court allowed the appeal directing independent verification of the appellant's expenditure claims before rejecting reimbursement of grant-in-aid under the Scheme of Coaching for Scheduled Tribes.
Mukesh Jain v. Union of India
The Delhi High Court held that for determining tax dues under the Sabka Vishwas Scheme, the reduced and accepted demand in the adjudicating authority's order-in-original prevails over the original SCN amount, even if the order is set aside and remanded.
Mother Dairy Fruit and Vegetable Pvt Ltd v. Satpal Singh
The Delhi High Court held that gratuity under the Payment of Gratuity Act cannot be forfeited without compliance with Section 4(6) and principles of natural justice, setting aside prior orders and directing fresh proceedings.
Principal Commissioner of Income Tax (Central)-2 v. Vinita Chaurasia
The Delhi High Court upheld the ITAT's order dismissing Revenue's appeal and held that reassessment under Section 147 cannot be based solely on a seized document without corroborative evidence for AY 2007-08.