Delhi High Court
28,840 judgments
Adarsh Teotia v. Netra Institute of Geoinformatics Management and Technologies Foundation and Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed a writ petition seeking re-conduction of missed university exams, holding that the student failed to exercise due diligence despite official publication of exam schedules and provision of login credentials.
Freecharge Payment Technologies Pvt Ltd v. Frederica Marketing Pvt Ltd
The Delhi High Court directed the judgment debtor to deposit the entire decretal amount within three weeks, refusing further adjournments due to dishonor of post-dated cheques and non-compliance with court orders in execution of a settlement decree.
Krishna Rai v. Banaras Hindu University
The Court held that an examining board cannot alter prescribed promotion rules without authority, set aside irregular promotions at BHU, and directed fresh promotions in accordance with the rules.
Jayson Industries and Anr. v. Crown Craft (India) Pvt. Ltd.
The Delhi High Court held that credible challenges to the novelty and originality of registered designs based on prior publication preclude interlocutory injunctions for design piracy pending trial.
The Chief Executive Officer J and K Era Srinagar Kashmir v. Abhiram Infra Projects Pvt Ltd
The Delhi High Court dismissed a Section 34 petition challenging an arbitral award as barred by the 120-day limitation period under the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, rejecting the petitioner's contention to apply the Jammu & Kashmir Arbitration Act.
Rukminidevi Arundale College of Education v. National Council for Teacher Education
The Delhi High Court quashed the withdrawal of recognition of a teacher training institute by NCTE for non-compliance with procedural fairness and held that withdrawal must be based on grounds specified in the show cause notice with an opportunity to respond.
Arun Kumar v. The Principal PP International School and Anr.
The Delhi High Court directed provisional admission of a Scheduled Caste child to a private school under the RTE Act following a computerized draw of lots, holding that schools must admit children allotted seats unless valid representations are filed.
Kirti v. Union of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that correction of date of birth in educational certificates based on public documents cannot be rejected solely on limitation grounds and remanded the matter for fresh consideration in line with the Supreme Court's Jigya Yadav ruling.
Jindal Saw Ltd v. M A Zahid Proprietor SMSK Mineral Trading Company
The Delhi High Court continued interim restraint on alienation of respondent's properties to secure enforcement of an arbitral award in favor of the petitioner.
M/S K.S JAIN v. GENERAL MANAGER NORTHERN RAILWAY & ANR.
The Delhi High Court allowed the petition for appointment of an arbitrator under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, holding that allegations of duress affecting the arbitration agreement are to be decided by the arbitral tribunal and not at the appointment stage.
Rajinder Kumar Narula v. Prince Tandon
The Delhi High Court appointed an arbitrator under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, holding that the court's role is limited to verifying the arbitration agreement and not the merits of the dispute.
Union Bank of India v. Shashi Malik
The Delhi High Court set aside the dismissal of a loan recovery suit for non-service, holding that failure to serve summons does not prove non-existence of the defendant and remanded the matter for fresh consideration of substituted service.
Anubhav Jain v. High Court of Delhi
The Delhi High Court held that a person with benchmark disability is entitled to reservation benefits in promotion to the Delhi Higher Judicial Service from the date of eligibility, interpreting the extended zone of consideration expansively under the DoPT OM.
International Hospital Limited v. DCIT Circle 12 (2)
The Delhi High Court held that assessment notices issued in the name of amalgamating companies dissolved by operation of law are void and not curable under Section 292B of the Income Tax Act, affirming the Supreme Court's ruling in Maruti Suzuki.
Raj Kumari Taneja v. Rajinder Kumar & Ors.
The Delhi High Court appointed an arbitrator under Section 11(5) of the Arbitration Act to resolve partnership disputes, holding that questions of settlement are for the arbitrator to decide.
Raj Kumari Taneja v. Rajinder Kumar & Anr.
The Delhi High Court held that under Section 11(5) of the Arbitration Act, the Court must appoint an arbitrator if an arbitration agreement exists and the petition is timely, leaving factual disputes such as settlement to the arbitrator.
Pawan Daubey v. State of Uttar Pradesh & Ors.
The Supreme Court allowed the appeal, holding that a subsequent licensee must be heard before cancellation of a license affecting their rights, setting aside the High Court order and directing fresh hearing.
Ritu Maheshwari v. Promotional Club
The Supreme Court held that termination of a development scheme extinguishes allotment rights under it, upheld Noida's new scheme allotments, and set aside High Court orders directing consideration under the closed scheme.
Chhavi v. University of Delhi
The Delhi High Court dismissed the writ petition challenging the University of Delhi's restriction limiting the number of papers in the Second Centenary Chance examination, holding that academic policy decisions are within the university's exclusive discretion and not subject to judicial interference absent arbitrariness.