Delhi High Court

59,941 judgments

Year:

Shampa Ghosh v. Alok Kumar Dey & Ors.

23 Nov 2022 · Amit Bansal · 2022:DHC:5053

The Delhi High Court dismissed defendants' applications to reject the plaint in a partition suit, holding that disputed issues including Will validity and prior suit involvement require trial and that court fees paid was proper.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant Order VII Rule 11 CPC Section 68 Indian Evidence Act partition suit court fees

Naval Kishore Dixit v. Union of India

23 Nov 2022 · Suresh Kumar Kait; Saurabh Banerjee · 2022:DHC:5099-DB

The Delhi High Court directed the authorities to decide the petitioner's pending resignation application within two weeks and allowed the petitioner liberty to seek extension for joining the MD course.

administrative other resignation application extension of time MD Paediatrics course Lady Hardinge Medical College

Ram Phool v. PO, Labour Court-VII & Ors.

23 Nov 2022 · Gaurang Kanth · 2022:DHC:5139

The Delhi High Court upheld the termination of a driver by Delhi Transport Corporation after a fair domestic enquiry where the petitioner admitted guilt and failed to challenge the enquiry officer’s evidence.

labor petition_dismissed Significant domestic enquiry principles of natural justice unauthorized absence disciplinary action

PVR LIMITED v. IMPERIA WISHFIELD PRIVATE LIMITED

23 Nov 2022 · Mini Pushkarna · 2022:DHC:5052

The Delhi High Court held that the arbitration agreement survives termination of the main contract and appointed an arbitrator to adjudicate disputes over refund of security deposit.

civil appeal_allowed Significant arbitration agreement severability Section 11(6) Arbitration Act Release Deed

State v. Mohd. Javed Nasir & Ors.

23 Nov 2022 · Swarana Kanta Sharma · 2022:DHC:5071

The Delhi High Court set aside the trial court's discharge of accused under Section 376 IPC, holding that a Section 164 CrPC statement disclosing rape suffices to frame charges despite discrepancies in the FIR or medical report.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Section 376 IPC framing of charge Section 164 CrPC statement prima facie case

TPS Infrastructure Limited v. Ranchi MSW Pvt Limited & Anr.

23 Nov 2022 · Amit Bansal · 2022:DHC:5162

The Delhi High Court allowed condonation of delay in filing written statement due to COVID-19 limitation extensions and referred the dispute to arbitration under the contract's arbitration clause, dismissing the suit against a non-party.

civil appeal_allowed Significant condonation of delay written statement limitation period COVID-19 pandemic

Narsingh Shah v. BDR Developers Pvt. Ltd.

23 Nov 2022 · C. Hari Shankar · 2022:DHC:5179

The Delhi High Court quashed an order striking off the tenant's defence for non-payment of rent, holding that mandatory procedural safeguards under Order XV-A CPC were not complied with.

civil petition_allowed Significant Order XV-A CPC striking off defence show cause notice deposit of rent

Rajeev C. Mathur and Anr. v. Union of India and Ors.

23 Nov 2022 · Satish Chandra Sharma; Subramonium Prasad · 2022:DHC:5151-DB
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court held that persons with disabilities are entitled to reservation in promotions to Group 'A' and 'B' posts under the PwD Act, overruling government OMs and earlier tribunal decisions to the contrary.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant Persons with Disabilities Act, 1995 reservation in promotion Group A and B posts Central Administrative Tribunal

Air Customs v. State

23 Nov 2022 · Sudhir Kumar Jain · 2022:DHC:5390

The Delhi High Court held that a trial court cannot dismiss proceedings against an absconding accused merely because non-bailable warrants remain unexecuted and must instead follow the procedure under Section 82 Cr.P.C. to declare the accused a proclaimed offender.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant non-bailable warrant proclaimed offender Section 82 Cr.P.C. extradition

Bijender Singh v. M/s Religare Housing Development Finance Corporation Ltd

23 Nov 2022 · Gaurang Kanth · 2022:DHC:5140

The Delhi High Court dismissed the appeal holding that civil courts lack jurisdiction under Section 34 of the SARFAESI Act to entertain suits challenging receiver appointment orders absent clear fraud, and unregistered documents do not confer title to immovable property.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant SARFAESI Act Section 34 SARFAESI civil court jurisdiction equitable mortgage

SI Daya Chand v. Govt. of NCT of Delhi

23 Nov 2022 · Sanjeev Sachdeva; Tushar Rao Gedela · 2022:DHC:5057-DB

The Delhi High Court held that failure to offer a pay fixation option at promotion constitutes discrimination, directing retrospective re-fixation of pay and payment of arrears to the petitioner.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant pay fixation option for pay fixation discrimination Article 14

Parminder Khetarpal v. State of NCT Delhi & Anr.

23 Nov 2022 · Swarana Kanta Sharma · 2022:DHC:5062

The Delhi High Court upheld the conviction under Section 138 NI Act but dismissed the petition challenging the grant of probation to the accused, affirming the liberal approach towards probation for first-time offenders with good conduct.

criminal petition_dismissed Significant Section 138 Negotiable Instruments Act Probation of Offenders Act Section 360 CrPC benefit of probation

Kumar Infratrade Enterprises Private Limited v. Indian Railway Catering and Tourism Corporation Limited & Ors.

23 Nov 2022 · Satish Chandra Sharma; Subramonium Prasad · 2022:DHC:5149-DB
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court upheld IRCTC's disqualification of a bidder for non-compliance with essential tender eligibility criteria, emphasizing strict adherence to tender terms and limited judicial interference in administrative tender decisions.

administrative petition_dismissed Significant tender eligibility criteria aggregate turnover audited financial statements judicial review

Vishal Arora v. Yes Bank Limited; Hemant Dhingra v. Yes Bank Limited

23 Nov 2022 · Swarana Kanta Sharma · 2022:DHC:5061
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court dismissed petitions seeking quashing of complaint and summons against former authorized signatories of a company in a cheque dishonour case, holding that their resignation prior to dishonour is a disputed fact requiring trial.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant Negotiable Instruments Act Section 138 Section 141 Cheque dishonour

H.T. Media Limited v. Principal Commissioner of Income Tax-4, Delhi

23 Nov 2022 · Manmohan; Manmeet Pritam Singh Arora

The Delhi High Court upheld the disallowance of administrative expenses under Section 14A read with Rule 8D(2)(iii) against H.T. Media Ltd., holding that the Assessing Officer properly recorded satisfaction before rejecting the Assessee's own disallowance and including subsidiary investments in the computation.

tax appeal_dismissed Significant Section 14A Income Tax Act Rule 8D(2)(iii) Income Tax Rules disallowance of administrative expenses tax-exempt dividend income

National Thermal Power Corporation Ltd. v. Badarpur Power Engineers & Workers Union

23 Nov 2022 · Gaurang Kanth · 2022:DHC:5202

The Delhi High Court held that settlements arrived at during conciliation proceedings are binding on all employees and set aside a Labour Court award granting blanket compassionate appointments ignoring binding settlements, remanding the matter for reconsideration.

labor appeal_allowed Significant compassionate appointment conciliation settlement Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 binding settlement

Ajay Passi v. Priyanka Passi

23 Nov 2022 · Dinesh Kumar Sharma · 2022:DHC:5199

The Delhi High Court condoned delay and allowed the petitioner to file affidavit evidence and be cross-examined, directing expeditious disposal of the family dispute matter.

family other condonation of delay affidavit evidence cross-examination closure of evidence

Delhi Development Authority v. Pushpa Wanti & Ors.

23 Nov 2022 · Satish Chandra Sharma; Subramonium Prasad · 2022:DHC:5154-DB
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court held that disputed factual claims under a State largesse scheme cannot be decided in writ jurisdiction and must be adjudicated by a civil court, setting aside the Single Judge's order granting Category A benefits under the Gadgil Assurance Scheme.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant Gadgil Assurance Scheme State largesse Article 226 writ jurisdiction

Ram Chander v. M/S Rama Industries

23 Nov 2022 · Manoj Kumar Ohri · 2022:DHC:5182

The Delhi High Court held that once a claim petition is barred under the ESI Act, the Employees’ Compensation Commissioner should not decide on merits, setting aside the impugned order and allowing the appeal.

labor appeal_allowed Significant Employees’ Compensation Act, 1923 Employees' State Insurance Act, 1948 maintainability statutory bar

Rajeev Yadav v. Union of India

23 Nov 2022 · Suresh Kumar Kait; Saurabh Banerjee · 2022:DHC:5098-DB

The Delhi High Court directed a fresh medical examination by an independent board to determine the petitioner's fitness for service and mandated reinstatement if found fit, quashing the termination orders pending such examination.

administrative other Significant medical fitness termination of service fresh medical board reinstatement