Delhi High Court
28,840 judgments
India Tourism Development Corporation v. M/S Bajaj Electricals Ltd.
The Delhi High Court condoned the delay in filing and re-filing a petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, holding that initial non-est filing does not bar limitation if defects are cured within the extended period.
Sarbaj Singh v. Union of India and Ors.
The Delhi High Court directed the respondents to adjudicate the petitioner's statutory petitions under the BSF Act, 1968 within six weeks, without commenting on merits.
Welcomgroup CGHS Limited v. M/S. Omstar Constructions Co P Ltd
The High Court allowed the transfer petition to consolidate two execution petitions relating to the same arbitral award before a single court to ensure judicial economy and avoid conflicting orders.
Annapurna Jaiswal v. Indian Oil Corporation Ltd. and Others
The court held that the lease term for petrol pump allotment starts from the petrol pump approval date, not the lease deed date, denying the appellant long-term lease benefits and dismissing the appeal.
Messrs New Victoria Vimals v. Shrikant Iyer
The Supreme Court held that acceptance of a voluntary retirement application under MVRS is binding and not revocable before the effective date, validating the termination and denying reinstatement.
Messrs New Victoria Vimals v. Shrikant Iyer
The Supreme Court held that once a voluntary retirement application under MVRS is accepted by the employer, it becomes irrevocable and terminates employment from the cutoff date, dismissing the employee's attempt to withdraw the application post-acceptance.
Rakesh Sawhney & Anr. v. M/S Skyline Constructions & Anr.
The Delhi High Court appointed an arbitrator under Section 11(5) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 to resolve disputes arising from a Collaboration Agreement due to parties' failure to mutually appoint one.
Mohammad Zahid v. NCB
The Supreme Court held that sentences in separate NDPS cases registered under different FIRs and tried by different courts run consecutively by default under Section 427 CrPC unless the court expressly orders otherwise, and dismissed the appellant's plea for concurrent sentences.
PepsiCo India Holdings Pvt Ltd v. Kavitha Kuruganti
The Delhi High Court upheld the revocation of PepsiCo’s plant variety registration due to incorrect information and procedural non-compliance under the Protection of Plant Varieties and Farmers’ Rights Act, 2001.
M/S Keystone Solutions v. BBQC Hospitality Pvt Ltd
The Delhi High Court allowed the petition to refer disputes to arbitration and appointed an arbitrator despite the non-existence of the specified LCIA India Arbitration Rules.
Davneet Kaur v. Jamia Millia Islamia and Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the writ petition holding that a B.Ed. specialization in Mental Retardation does not qualify as specialization in Learning Disabilities for admission to the M.Ed. course at Jamia Millia Islamia University.
MEDIPOL PHARMACEUTICAL INDIA PVT LTD v. UNION OF INDIA AND ANR
The Delhi High Court upheld a two-year debarment of a pharmaceutical firm for supplying sub-standard drugs but granted interim protection against further debarment pending arbitration.
Daulat Ram Dharam Bir Auto Private Limited & Ors. v. Pivotal Infrastructure Private Limited & Ors.
The Delhi High Court appointed an arbitrator under Section 11 of the Arbitration Act to adjudicate disputes over a 10% share in built-up area under a Deed of Assignment, rejecting limitation and res judicata objections at this stage, but dismissed interim reliefs under Section 9 for lack of urgency.
Hewlett-Packard Financial Services (India) Private Limited v. Kuber Digital Studio
The Delhi High Court allowed the petition under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, appointing an arbitrator and referring the disputes to arbitration, confirming the limited scope of court's jurisdiction in such matters.
Goyal Housing Developrs LLP v. K. L. Rathi Steels Limited
The Delhi High Court held that allegations of fraud in an arbitration agreement must be decided by the Arbitral Tribunal and appointed an arbitrator under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.
Union of India v. Jagdish Singh
The Delhi High Court upheld that the post of Additional Commissioner of Income Tax (NFSG) is a promotional post under statutory IRS Rules, entitling seniors to promotion alongside juniors despite contrary executive instructions.
Ved Prakash v. Directorate of Education & Ors.
The Delhi High Court directed an unaided minority school to pay the petitioner arrears of pay revision and retiral benefits under the 6th and 7th Pay Commissions along with interest, enforcing entitlement by operation of law under the Delhi School Education Act.
Deepak Kumar Singh v. Union of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the writ petition challenging disciplinary proceedings against a BSF officer for acting beyond jurisdiction on verbal orders, holding that the inquiry and further evidence gathering were lawful and the Court would not interfere at the interlocutory stage.
Tata Capital Limited v. Aryan Pharma & Anr.
The Delhi High Court appointed an arbitrator under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, holding that the Court's role is limited to verifying the arbitration agreement and timeliness, without adjudicating on the merits.
Balbir Singh Bisht v. M/S. A V Workshop Limited and Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that illegal termination does not automatically entitle reinstatement, enhanced retrenchment compensation was awarded instead, and reinstatement was denied due to loss of trust and confidence.