Delhi High Court
95,375 judgments
Ram Sharma v. Ashok Kumar Sharma; Shyam Sharma; Anuradha Sharma
The Delhi High Court dismissed an application to set aside a compromise decree on grounds of fraud, holding that such decrees are binding unless valid compromise is disproved and ownership of immovable property requires registered sale deeds.
Rajat Agarwal v. Deputy Commissioner of Police Traffic
The Delhi High Court held that an order rejecting the plaint under Order VII Rule 11(d) CPC is a decree and only appeal under Section 96 CPC is maintainable, dismissing the revision petition under Section 115 CPC.
Chimes Aviation Private Limited v. United India Insurance Company Limited
The Delhi High Court held it lacks territorial jurisdiction under Section 11 of the Arbitration & Conciliation Act, 1996 to appoint an arbitrator as the arbitration clause in the insurance policy designates London as the seat and English law as governing law.
Amandeep Singh v. Pradeep Kumar
The Delhi High Court dismissed the appeal challenging a suit decree under Order XXXVII CPC, holding that failure to deposit conditional security justified granting judgment to the plaintiff where the defendant's defence was plausible but improbable.
Raj Kumar v. Government of National Capital Territory of Delhi
The Delhi High Court held that under the 1961 Scheme, only persons whose entire land has been acquired are eligible for alternative plot allotment, dismissing the petition of a partially affected landowner.
Dhanwanti @ Dhanpati & Anr. v. The State & Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition seeking quashing of an FIR for theft of a mobile phone, holding that return of the stolen phone and complainant's willingness to proceed do not justify quashing under Section 482 Cr.P.C.
ABB Limited v. Commissioner VAT Delhi
The Delhi High Court held that input tax credit under the DVAT Act, 2004 can only be claimed for the tax period in which the turnover or purchase arises, as determined by the consideration received or receivable, and not based solely on the date of tax invoices or subsequent reimbursement arrangements.
HANS STUDY CENTER v. UNION OF INDIA & ANR
The Delhi High Court allowed the appeal directing independent verification of the appellant's expenditure claims before rejecting reimbursement of grant-in-aid under the Scheme of Coaching for Scheduled Tribes.
Mukesh Jain v. Union of India
The Delhi High Court held that for determining tax dues under the Sabka Vishwas Scheme, the reduced and accepted demand in the adjudicating authority's order-in-original prevails over the original SCN amount, even if the order is set aside and remanded.
Mother Dairy Fruit and Vegetable Pvt Ltd v. Satpal Singh
The Delhi High Court held that gratuity under the Payment of Gratuity Act cannot be forfeited without compliance with Section 4(6) and principles of natural justice, setting aside prior orders and directing fresh proceedings.
Principal Commissioner of Income Tax (Central)-2 v. Vinita Chaurasia
The Delhi High Court upheld the ITAT's order dismissing Revenue's appeal and held that reassessment under Section 147 cannot be based solely on a seized document without corroborative evidence for AY 2007-08.
Hardeep v. State
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition to quash the charge sheet in an online exam cheating case, holding that the allegations prima facie disclose an offence and the inherent power under Section 482 CrPC should be exercised sparingly.
Kumud Chawla & Ors. v. The State of NCT of Delhi & Anr.
The Delhi High Court upheld the trial court's framing of charges against the petitioners under IPC and POCSO Act, ruling that sufficient prima facie material existed despite contradictory witness statements, and dismissed the revision petition seeking discharge.
Amiown Schools Pvt. Ltd. v. Govt. of NCT of Delhi & Ors.
The Delhi High Court allowed transfer of industrial dispute cases back to Industrial Tribunal-2 after the presiding officer joined, disposing of the writ petition challenging the earlier order keeping the transfer in abeyance.
Vineet Kumar Meena v. Union of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court allowed a petitioner declared unfit due to a tattoo on the right arm to remove the tattoo and appear before a Medical Board for reconsideration of fitness for recruitment.
State (GNCTD) v. Md. Jabbar
The Delhi High Court upheld the trial court's discharge of the accused under the POCSO Act, holding that the ossification test's age range and absence of documentary proof entitled the accused to the benefit of doubt regarding the victim's minority.
Col. Amardeep Singh IC 59054Y v. Union of India
The Delhi High Court held that promotion disputes of armed forces personnel fall within the exclusive jurisdiction of the Armed Forces Tribunal and dismissed the writ petition as not maintainable, directing the petitioner to file a fresh representation.
H.S. Sahni v. SAIC Motor Corporation Limited & Ors.
The Delhi High Court granted an interim injunction restraining the plaintiff from using the 'M.G.' marks in automobile parts, recognizing the defendants' superior trans-border reputation and commercial use in India.
Dharmender Hooda v. The State of NCT of Delhi & Ors.
The Delhi High Court upheld charges under Sections 376, 377, and 506 IPC but set aside the charge under Section 328 IPC due to lack of prima facie evidence of administration of intoxicating substance.
Poonam v. Radha Rani
The Delhi High Court dismissed the second appeal upholding that the appellant wife was a licensee without right to reside in the property as a shared household under the Domestic Violence Act, affirming the owner's right to possession.