Delhi High Court

95,375 judgments

Year:

Yadvinder Singh v. Neha Singh

28 Nov 2022 · Dinesh Kumar Sharma · 2022:DHC:5257

The Delhi High Court allowed the petitioner to examine witnesses in family court proceedings subject to costs and strict timelines, emphasizing the right to lead evidence and procedural discipline.

family appeal_allowed examination of witnesses family court right to lead evidence adjournment

Taurus Englobe Pvt. Ltd. v. Bhavin R Shah

28 Nov 2022 · Manmohan; Saurabh Banerjee · 2022:DHC:5369-DB

The Delhi High Court dismissed the appellant's challenge to jurisdiction and upheld the trial court's decree for payment, holding that partial cause of action within jurisdiction and presence of registered office confer jurisdiction.

civil appeal_dismissed jurisdiction cause of action registered office commercial suit

Insolvency and Bankruptcy Board of India v. State Bank of India & Ors.

28 Nov 2022 · Prathiba M. Singh · 2022:DHC:5245

The Delhi High Court held that the NCLT lacks jurisdiction to declare IBBI regulations ultra vires and set aside the NCLT order invalidating Regulation 36A of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Board of India Regulations.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 Regulation 36A Insolvency and Bankruptcy Board of India National Company Law Tribunal

Nitin Kumar & Ors. v. State (NCT of Delhi) & Anr.

28 Nov 2022 · Dinesh Kumar Sharma · 2022:DHC:5477

The Delhi High Court quashed the FIR and all proceedings under Sections 498A, 406, and 34 IPC based on a voluntary settlement and withdrawal of allegations in a matrimonial dispute.

criminal petition_allowed quashing of FIR matrimonial dispute Section 498A IPC Section 406 IPC

Union of India v. Bishan Singh

28 Nov 2022 · V. Kameswar Rao; Anoop Kumar Mendiratta · 2022:DHC:5239-DB

The Delhi High Court set aside the CAT order directing regularization of a worker without formal appointment, holding that identity cards and daily wages do not confer a right to regularization absent appointment against a sanctioned post.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant regularization of service DoPT OMs identity card entry pass

Mukesh Kumar Mittal v. Vimlesh Gupta

28 Nov 2022 · Manmeet Pritam Singh Arora · 2023:DHC:6514

The Delhi High Court held that a review petition seeking revival of an interlocutory application for use and occupation charges after dismissal of the main revision petition is not maintainable and dismissed the review petition.

property petition_dismissed Significant review petition interlocutory application use and occupation charges mesne profits

Rashmi Dixit v. Medical Council of India & Anr.

25 Nov 2022 · Rajiv Shakdher; Tara Vitasta Ganju · 2022:DHC:5156-DB

The Delhi High Court allowed the appeal and remanded the matter for fresh inquiry into medical negligence and false representation of qualifications by a doctor, emphasizing that misrepresentation of specialization presumes deficiency in medical service.

medical negligence / administrative appeal_allowed Significant medical negligence false representation medical qualifications Article 226

Neelam Kumari & Ors. v. M/s The New India Assurance Co. Ltd. & Anr.

25 Nov 2022 · Manoj Kumar Ohri · 2022:DHC:5197
Cites 7 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court set aside the dismissal of a second compensation claim application under the Employees’ Compensation Act, 1923, holding that withdrawal of the first claim does not bar a fresh claim and emphasizing the necessity of reasoned judicial orders.

labor appeal_allowed Significant Employees’ Compensation Act, 1923 claim application res judicata non-speaking order

Make My Trip (India) Private Limited v. Owners of www.makemytripmood.com & Ors.

25 Nov 2022 · Navin Chawla · 2022:DHC:5137

The Delhi High Court granted summary judgment in favor of MakeMyTrip, permanently restraining defendants from using a deceptively similar domain name and marks, holding that domain names enjoy trademark protection and summary judgment is appropriate where defendants fail to contest.

civil appeal_allowed Significant trademark infringement passing off domain name summary judgment

Jai Shree Holidays and Tours Pvt Ltd v. Prakash Verma

25 Nov 2022 · C. Hari Shankar · 2022:DHC:5183

The Delhi High Court upheld the deletion of Respondent 4 from the suit under Order I Rule 10 CPC, holding that mere signature as a witness does not establish guarantor liability and that the High Court's supervisory jurisdiction under Article 227 is limited.

civil petition_dismissed Significant Order I Rule 10 CPC Article 227 Constitution of India necessary party proper party

Vidur Impex and Traders Pvt. Ltd. v. Tosh Apartments Private Limited

25 Nov 2022 · Suresh Kumar Kait; Saurabh Banerjee · 2022:DHC:5218-DB

The Delhi High Court dismissed the appeal and upheld the nullity of sale deeds executed in violation of injunction orders, reaffirming the Supreme Court's prior adjudication and the principle of res judicata.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant sale deed injunction res judicata specific performance

Anand Jindal v. Dharampal Gupta

25 Nov 2022 · Poonam A. Bamba · 2022:DHC:5258

The Delhi High Court allowed the petitioner limited opportunity to examine a material defence witness despite closure of his defence evidence due to repeated adjournments without credible medical proof, emphasizing the need for timely production of medical documents and preventing abuse of process.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant closure of defence evidence adjournment on medical grounds Section 138 Negotiable Instruments Act Section 315 CrPC

Ved Prakash v. Union of India

25 Nov 2022 · Anu Malhotra

The Delhi High Court upheld the enhanced compensation awarded to landowners for land acquired for the Mass Rapid Transit System, rejecting the Union of India's appeal to reduce the market value and affirming entitlement to solatium and interest.

property appeal_dismissed Significant Land Acquisition Act 1894 market value compensation solatium

DR B L KAPUR MEMORIAL HOSPITAL v. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (TDS) DELHI 1 & ORS.

25 Nov 2022 · Manmohan; Manmeet Pritam Singh Arora

The Delhi High Court held that the 20% deposit condition for stay of tax demand under Section 201(1) is directory, set aside non-speaking orders rejecting stay, and remanded for fresh hearing considering key legal principles.

tax appeal_allowed Significant Section 201(1) Income Tax Act stay of demand tax deduction at source contract of service

Darshan Lal v. Union of India and Others

25 Nov 2022 · Sanjeev Sachdeva; Tushar Rao Gedela · 2022:DHC:5200-DB

The Delhi High Court set aside the CAT's non-speaking order on pay fixation and remanded the matter for fresh consideration with a speaking order.

administrative other pay fixation Central Administrative Tribunal speaking order remand

Vikram Mehra v. Govt. of NCT of Delhi & Ors.

25 Nov 2022 · Neena Bansal Krishna · 2022:DHC:5113

The Delhi High Court granted Probate of a duly attested registered Will to the petitioner, the sole beneficiary and Executor, in absence of any valid objections from legal heirs.

civil petition_allowed Probate Indian Succession Act, 1925 Registered Will Executor

Yogendra Singh v. Pushpa Singh & Ors.

25 Nov 2022 · Neena Bansal Krishna · 2022:DHC:5131

The Delhi High Court granted probate of a duly attested Will under Section 276 of the Indian Succession Act, 1925, holding it to be the last valid Will of the deceased despite objections alleging forgery.

civil petition_allowed Indian Succession Act, 1925 Section 276 probate Letter of Administration

Rajeev Arora; Naveen Sagar; Sanjay Awasthi; Mohd. Akhtar; Raman Abrol v. State

25 Nov 2022 · Anoop Kumar Mendiratta
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court dismissed bail applications of accused involved in a Rs. 3 crore gemstone cheating case, emphasizing the necessity of custodial interrogation despite interim protection granted earlier.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant anticipatory bail custodial interrogation criminal conspiracy cheating

Usha Rani Girdhar v. Income Tax Officer Ward 36(1), Delhi & Ors.

25 Nov 2022 · Manmohan; Manmeet Pritam Singh Arora · 2022:DHC:5463-DB

The Delhi High Court set aside income tax reassessment notices and order for AY 2017-18 due to incorrect foundational allegations in the Section 148A(b) notice and held that such defects cannot be cured by supplementary notices.

tax petition_allowed Significant Section 148A(b) notice Income Tax Act limitation Foundational allegation Supplementary notice

Chandani Jagtap and Ors. v. Shri B Chandrashekhar and Anr.

25 Nov 2022 · Vibhu Bakhru; Amit Mahajan

Contempt petitions for non-compliance with court orders on AYUSH admissions were dismissed after respondents tendered unconditional apology, with substantive rights reserved.

administrative petition_dismissed Contempt of Court AYUSH admission NEET examination Interim orders