Delhi High Court
95,375 judgments
Gulshan Kumar Chawla v. Vijay Kumar Chawla & Ors.
The Delhi High Court allowed the petitioner to summon relevant witnesses to support his defence in a probate petition, emphasizing the necessity of examining material witnesses for fair adjudication.
Sandeep Thakur v. Government of National Capital Territory of Delhi and Anr.
The Delhi High Court held that a contract employee guilty of misconduct can be lawfully terminated without renewal or show cause notice, and the settled principle barring replacement by another contract employee does not apply in such cases.
Ankush Sood v. The State of NCT of Delhi & Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under sections 498A and 406 IPC based on a voluntary settlement and withdrawal of complaint by the complainant in a matrimonial dispute.
Narinder Kumar Jain v. Simmi Jain & Ors.
The Delhi High Court allowed legal representatives of a deceased petitioner to file a written statement after closure of the right, subject to costs, and directed the Trial Court to proceed accordingly.
Vijay Kumar & Anr. v. State of NCT of Delhi & Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under sections 498A, 406, and 34 IPC based on a voluntary settlement and withdrawal of complaint by the complainant during divorce proceedings.
Sh. Mahaveer Prasad Saini v. State & Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Section 354 IPC arising from a matrimonial dispute after the parties settled amicably and the complainant withdrew the complaint voluntarily.
Adobe, Inc v. Namase Patel and Others
The Delhi High Court granted permanent injunctions and damages to Adobe Inc. against Defendant 1 for trademark infringement and cyber squatting involving confusingly similar domain names and misuse of catch-all email services.
Central Bureau of Investigation v. State Bank through Rajinder Kumar Dhingra
The Delhi High Court set aside the Special Judge's order denying jurisdiction and rejecting search warrants, holding that invocation of the PC Act at the investigation stage is not premature and remanded the matter for proper disposal.
PUMA SE v. D.K. ARORA
The Delhi High Court held that a plaint alleging trade mark infringement must not be rejected under Order VII Rule 10 CPC if it discloses a cause of action within territorial jurisdiction, and set aside the order returning the plaint for lack of jurisdiction.
Asif Raza Khan v. Union of India and Ors.
The Delhi High Court directed the respondents to consider the petitioner's claim for pension restoration based on a 55% disability certificate as a representation and decide it within a stipulated time.
Phool Singh @ Phool Chand v. State (NCT of Delhi)
The Delhi High Court upheld the trial court's refusal to recall a mentally disabled child victim for cross-examination after a three-year delay, balancing the accused's fair trial rights with POCSO Act protections.
Manoj Kumar Bisht v. Ankit Somani
The Delhi High Court held that a complaint under Section 138 NI Act filed through a power of attorney holder is maintainable even without specific averment of personal knowledge, and the competency of the attorney is to be tested at trial, not at summoning.
Swiss Bike Vertrjevs Gmbh Subsidiary of Accell Group v. Imperial Cycle Meg. Co.
The Delhi High Court granted an interim injunction restraining the defendants from using the mark 'RALLIES' for bicycles due to its deceptive similarity with the plaintiff's registered trademark 'RALEIGH', allowing limited time to clear existing stock.
Shri Narender Kumar Gulati v. V.K. Gulati & Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the plaintiff's suit for partition of a property held benami, holding that the plaintiff failed to prove the property was held in trust and that the suit was barred under the Benami Property Act.
Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax -7 v. PEC Ltd.
The Delhi High Court upheld the Tribunal's ruling that CSR expenditure incurred before assessment year 2015-16 is deductible under Section 37 of the Income Tax Act, as the amendment excluding such expenses is prospective.
Pallab Chakraborty v. The State (NCT of Delhi) and Anr.
The Delhi High Court disposed of the anticipatory bail application after chargesheet filing, directing the petitioner to seek regular bail before the trial court.
Supertech Realtors Private Limited v. Bank of Maharashtra
The Delhi High Court held that a writ petition cannot be used to alter the terms of a One-Time Settlement contract, affirming that the moratorium period must be calculated from the original sanction date and dismissing the appellant's appeal.
Power Grid Corporation of India Limited v. Deepak Cables (India) Limited (In Liq)
The Delhi High Court upheld the Sole Arbitrator's right to revise arbitration fees under the Fourth Schedule after stay of multiple arbitration proceedings, dismissing the petition seeking termination of his mandate.
Raj Kumar v. State (Govt. of NCT of Delhi)
The Delhi High Court dismissed the anticipatory bail application of the accused in a serious economic offence involving illegal gratification, emphasizing the necessity of custodial interrogation and thorough investigation.
Naveen alias Akshay v. State and Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 354, 354A, and 506 IPC after the complainant married the accused and they were living together peacefully without coercion.