Delhi High Court
60,724 judgments
Vijay Kumar Sharma & Ors. v. Union Public Service Commission & Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that the Ministry cannot impose new eligibility criteria or delay appointments after UPSC's recommendation and Court's direction, dismissing the Ministry's application to modify the appointment order.
Suraj @ Sonu v. State
The Delhi High Court upheld the conviction of appellants for murder based on a complete chain of circumstantial evidence including last seen testimony, mobile phone records, ATM withdrawals, and forensic findings.
Dr. Abhishek Kumar v. Govt. of NCT of Delhi and Ors.
The Delhi High Court upheld the administrative discretion in posting a General Duty Medical Officer and clarified that grant of Equated Teaching Designation requires prescribed teaching experience and university approval, dismissing the petitioner’s claim for exclusive specialty posting and automatic teaching designation.
Mukesh Jain v. Rajender Prasad Jain & Ors.
The Delhi High Court allowed elections to proceed subject to restrictions and directed the Trial Court to re-hear the injunction application considering all relevant resolutions.
Karanvir Singh v. Dy. General Manager
The Delhi High Court dismissed the writ petition challenging denial of regularization to a temporary employee who failed to prove valid appointment and application under the employer’s regularization scheme.
Sanjay Gupta v. Union of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court upheld dismissal of an employee for unauthorized absence and misconduct, ruling that voluntary retirement under VRS requires formal acceptance and disciplinary proceedings post-application are valid if the employee remains in service.
SH KALE RAM v. SH AJAY & ORS
The Delhi High Court enhanced compensation for a motor accident victim by awarding future loss of income despite continued employment, full leave period compensation, and future medical expenses based on permanent disability impact.
Vikram @ Manoj v. State (GNCT of Delhi)
The Delhi High Court upheld the appellant's conviction for abduction and murder based on consistent circumstantial evidence including last seen testimony, recoveries, and call records, dismissing the appeal.
Dhankalash Distributors Private Limited v. Union of India through the Ministry of Corporate Affairs & Ors.
Delhi High Court directs IBBI to dispose of pending complaints against Resolution Professional within prescribed timelines under Regulation 7 of the 2017 Regulations.
Defsys Solutions Private Limited v. Union of India & Anr
Delhi High Court stayed the Ministry of Defence's suspension of business dealings with Defsys Solutions Pvt. Ltd. pending disclosure of investigation details, protecting ongoing contracts from suspension.
Pankaj @ Ishu v. State
The Delhi High Court upheld the murder convictions of three appellants under Section 302 read with Section 34 IPC, affirming that common intention can be inferred from conduct and corroborated eyewitness and forensic evidence suffice for conviction despite investigative deficiencies.
Hari Singh v. State (NCT of Delhi)
The Delhi High Court upheld the conviction of five accused for kidnapping and murder based on admissible disclosure statements, identification of the deceased, and corroborative electronic evidence, dismissing challenges to procedural and evidentiary aspects.
Kashif v. Narcotics Control Bureau
The Delhi High Court granted bail to the accused due to unreasonable delay of 51 days in filing the application under section 52A NDPS for sample drawing, holding that such delay vitiates the sample collection procedure and entitles the accused to the benefit of doubt.
Sanvik Engineers India Pvt Ltd v. Devyani International Ltd
The Delhi High Court appointed an arbitrator under Section 11(5) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 to resolve disputes arising from a lease deed containing a valid arbitration clause, as the respondent did not object to arbitration.
Narender Sharma v. Government of NCT of Delhi and Anr.
The Delhi High Court directed the employer to decide pending representations of disabled employees seeking reservation benefits in promotions under the PWD Act and relevant government orders by passing reasoned orders within six weeks.
Charu Chains and Jewels Pvt Ltd v. Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax
The Delhi High Court set aside the reassessment order under Section 148A(d) of the Income Tax Act for non-supply of underlying material and clarified that the time limit for passing such order runs from the expiry of the extended time granted to the taxpayer.
Neeta Bhardwaj & Ors. v. Kamlesh Sharma
The Delhi High Court allowed continuation of Kalkaji Mandir redevelopment without dispossessing occupants, directed enhanced security measures for New Year, and empowered the Administrator to address grievances and finalize redevelopment plans.
Govind Singh Bhakuni v. High Court of Delhi and Anr.
The Delhi High Court held that the suspension period pending disciplinary inquiry does not count as service for pensionary benefits when misconduct is proved, and judicial review cannot reappraise disciplinary findings on merits.
EIT Services India Pvt Ltd v. Union of India through Directorate General of Employment and Training
The Delhi High Court directed conciliation between parties and restrained blacklisting pending final decision, holding that premature writ petitions against administrative actions without final orders are not maintainable.
M/S OSHO G.S. AND COMPANY v. M/S WAPCOS LIMITED
The Delhi High Court held that a disqualified appointing authority under Section 12(5) of the Arbitration Act cannot validly appoint a sole arbitrator, terminating the prior appointment and directing a fresh appointment in compliance with the Act.