Delhi High Court
60,724 judgments
R S ROY COLLEGE OF PHARMACY v. Union of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court set aside a show-cause notice issued by the Pharmacy Council of India that indicated a predetermined decision to withdraw approval, holding that such notices must afford a fair opportunity to be heard and not show a closed mind.
TILA INSTITUTE OF PHARMACEUTICAL SCIENCE v. UNION OF INDIA AND ORS.
The Delhi High Court held that a show-cause notice indicating a predetermined decision to withdraw approval violates natural justice and set aside the PCI's withdrawal of recognition of the petitioner's D.Pharm course.
Jeeramani Jagdeesh Institute of Pharmacy v. Union of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court set aside a show-cause notice issued with a predetermined mind under Section 13 of the Pharmacy Act, holding that such notice violates natural justice and must be issued with an open mind.
Nishant v. Union of India and Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that cancellation of a candidate's admission seat for delayed document correction notified moments before the deadline was unjustified and directed re-allotment, emphasizing fairness over rigid procedural deadlines.
PTC India Ltd. v. Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax Circle 19 1, New Delhi & Anr.
The Delhi High Court allowed the writ petition directing the tax authorities to consider the petitioner's application for stay or refund expeditiously and restrained recovery pending appeal disposal.
PS Meena v. Government of NCT of Delhi and Anr.
The Delhi High Court held that a writ petition challenging a show cause notice for penalty revision is premature until the petitioner files a reply and the authority passes a reasoned order after hearing.
Raj Kumari v. The Chairman, Bank of Maharashtra and Others
The Delhi High Court set aside the dismissal of a bank employee due to procedural irregularities and failure to consider sexual harassment allegations, directing reinstatement without back wages.
Dr. Ahmad Kamal v. Guru Gobind Singh Indraprastha University
The Delhi High Court dismissed petitions challenging admissions under EWS quota, holding that the University acted lawfully relying on government-issued certificates and that late admission relief is only granted in exceptional cases involving fault by authorities.
Rajbir Singh v. MS Monk Trading Pvt Ltd
The Delhi High Court allowed impleadment of the deceased petitioner's legal representatives and directed the Trial Court to expeditiously hear pending applications to prevent prejudice.
Deep Kanwar Singh Walia v. The State NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court dismissed bail to a company director accused of fraud in a real estate scam, holding that notice under Section 41A CrPC was validly served at last known address and bail cannot be granted given the gravity of offence and petitioner’s role.
SHO, ACB v. Vijay Kataria
The Delhi High Court set aside a Magistrate's order directing FIR registration and investigation for corruption allegations due to lack of prior sanction under the Prevention of Corruption Act and failure to consider status reports with reasons.
New Bharat Overseas v. Kian Agro Processing Private Limited
The Delhi High Court granted an ad-interim injunction restraining defendants from using the 'TAJ MAHAL' trademark in India or for export, holding that affixation of a registered mark for export constitutes infringement under the Trade Marks Act, 1999.
Siddharth Rao v. The Government of NCT of Delhi & Ors
The Delhi High Court held that the Speaker of Delhi Legislative Assembly lacks authority to appoint or promote staff without Lt. Governor's approval and recruitment rules, validating the termination of the petitioner whose appointments were illegal.
Pradeep Ramdanee v. State
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petitioner's interim bail application on medical grounds, directing jail authorities to provide adequate treatment and facilitate cataract surgery in custody as per prior judicial orders.
Videocon Industries Limited v. Ram Raj Bhandari & Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that civil courts lack jurisdiction over company share disputes governed by the Companies Act, 2013, and such matters must be adjudicated by the NCLT, dismissing the civil suit accordingly.
Kanwar Bhan Hans & Ors. v. Delhi Development Authority & Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition challenging the demolition of unauthorized encroachments on Khasra No. 216, holding that petitioners lacked locus standi and that DDA was empowered to act under court directions while protecting religious structures.
Bharat Heavy Electricals Limited v. ABB India Ltd.
The Delhi High Court upheld the arbitral award holding that the appellant could not withhold payments or bank guarantees under the Bhawana contracts towards claims pending adjudication under a separate contract, affirming limited judicial interference with arbitral awards.
Vinay Rathi and Ors. v. Dhananjay Rathi and Ors.
The Delhi High Court disposed of an appeal challenging an ex-parte trademark injunction, directing the successor Court to decide pending amendment and interlocutory applications, emphasizing procedural compliance under Order XXXIX Rule 3A CPC.
M/S. ICON SLEEPER TRACK PRIVATE LIMITED v. Rail Vikas Nigam Limited
The Delhi High Court dismissed the appeal challenging an arbitral award, holding that the contractually agreed price variation formula including excise duty in base cement cost was correctly applied and not subject to judicial interference.
N.V. Satheesh Madhav and Anr. v. Deputy Controller of Patents and Designs
The Delhi High Court set aside the refusal of a patent application for a bio-bed using non-absorbent cotton due to lack of reasoned analysis on inventive step and remanded the matter for fresh consideration with due process.