Delhi High Court

94,906 judgments

Year:

Rameshwar v. DTC

04 Jan 2023 · Najmi Waziri; Gaurang Kanth · 2023:DHC:1662-DB
Cites 0 · Cited by 1

The Delhi High Court upheld disciplinary action against a DTC conductor for possession of used tickets, dismissing his appeal and confirming that such possession constitutes misconduct warranting dismissal.

labor appeal_dismissed Significant Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 misconduct possession of used tickets disciplinary action

Rajan Sood v. Delhi Development Authority

04 Jan 2023 · Manmeet Pritam Singh Arora · 2023:DHC:21

The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition challenging demolition on acquired land, holding that acquisition proceedings are final, possession vested with DDA, and the petitioners' representation under Section 48 is not maintainable.

property petition_dismissed Significant Land Acquisition Act, 1894 Section 48 representation possession land acquisition lapse

Jeewan Mondal v. State NCT of Delhi

04 Jan 2023 · Anish Dayal · 2023:DHC:38
Cites 4 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court granted bail to an undertrial accused in an NDPS case detained for over five years, holding that prolonged pre-trial detention violating the right to speedy trial under Article 21 overrides the stringent bail restrictions under Section 37 of the NDPS Act.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant NDPS Act Section 37 NDPS bail speedy trial

State of NCT of Delhi v. Ram Niwas

04 Jan 2023 · Anish Dayal · 2023:DHC:35

The High Court held that a Magistrate cannot discharge an accused at the committal stage in offences triable exclusively by the Sessions Court if prima facie evidence exists, and set aside orders discharging the accused in an abetment of suicide case.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Section 209 CrPC Abetment of suicide Committal proceedings Magistrate jurisdiction

Shubha Chakravarty & Anr. v. Union of India & Ors.

04 Jan 2023 · Prathiba M. Singh · 2023:DHC:42

The Delhi High Court held that OCI prospective adoptive parents must be treated at par with resident and non-resident Indian adoptive parents in adoption priority and seniority, as mandated by the Adoption Regulations, 2022.

family petition_allowed Significant Overseas Citizen of India Prospective Adoptive Parents Central Adoption Resource Authority Adoption Regulations 2022

Hrinmoy Das v. State of Delhi NCT & Anr.

04 Jan 2023 · Dinesh Kumar Sharma · 2023:DHC:44

The Delhi High Court granted bail to the accused in a rape case after finding evidence of a possible honey trap and extortion attempt, imposing conditions to protect the prosecutrix and ensure trial integrity.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant bail Section 376 IPC rape honey trap

M/S Mahajan Industries Pvt. Ltd. v. Gaon Sabha Chattarpur

04 Jan 2023 · Mini Pushkarna, J. · 2023:DHC:46

The Delhi High Court held that once land is urbanised by government notifications and Master Plan classification, proceedings under Section 81 of the Delhi Land Reforms Act, 1954 are not maintainable and quashed the conditional decree against the petitioner’s land in Village Chattarpur.

property petition_allowed Significant Delhi Land Reforms Act, 1954 urbanisation Section 81 DLR Act Master Plan of Delhi-2021

Bhagwan Singh as Guardian of Vivek v. Govt of NCT of Delhi and Another

04 Jan 2023 · Mini Pushkarna · 2017 SCC OnLine Del 7842

Delhi High Court dismissed the petition for admission beyond the 31st December cut-off date under the RTE Act but allowed the petitioner to seek admission for the next academic session.

constitutional petition_dismissed Significant Right of Children to Free and Compulsory Education Act, 2009 Admission cut-off date Disadvantaged Group category School admission

Rajender Prasad Pant v. M/s Exchange Agencies & Anr.

04 Jan 2023 · SATISH CHANDRA SHARMA, C.J.; SUBRAMONIUM PRASAD, C.J. · 2023:DHC:61-DB

The Delhi High Court dismissed the appellant's claim for wages due to lack of documentary evidence proving employment under the Delhi Shops and Establishment Act, 1954.

labor appeal_dismissed employment relationship burden of proof oral agreement appointment letter

Dr. Anil Kumar Gupta v. Union of India & Ors.

04 Jan 2023 · Satish Chandra Sharma; Subramonium Prasad · 2023:DHC:62-DB
Cites 3 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court dismissed the writ petition holding that the petitioner, a technical employee of ICAR, was not entitled to the higher veterinary pay scale under the 5th Central Pay Commission recommendations and the Office Memorandum dated 04.05.1999, as ICAR’s own service rules govern his pay.

administrative petition_dismissed pay scale revision Indian Council of Agricultural Research Technical Service Rules Central Pay Commission

N.A. & Ors. v. Govt of NCT of Delhi & Ors.

04 Jan 2023 · Prathiba M. Singh · 2023:DHC:49

The Delhi High Court exercised its parens patriae jurisdiction to appoint a guardianship committee for a 95-year-old woman in a vegetative state, filling a statutory gap in guardianship law under the RPWD and Mental Healthcare Acts.

civil appeal_allowed Significant parens patriae jurisdiction guardianship vegetative state Rights of Persons with Disabilities Act, 2016

Delhi Transport Corporation v. Ranbir Singh

04 Jan 2023 · Rekha Palli, J · 2023:DHC:66

The Delhi High Court upheld the Labour Court's modification of termination to retirement for an employee guilty of unauthorized absence but reduced pension entitlement proportionately for the period of unauthorized leave.

labor appeal_allowed Significant unauthorized absence termination of service modification of punishment Section 11A Industrial Disputes Act

Jasmeet Singh v. ICICI Bank Ltd

04 Jan 2023 · Tushar Rao Gedela · 2023:DHC:91

The Delhi High Court modified the Trial Court’s order to allow procedural correction of power of attorney without disregarding previously recorded evidence and preserved the petitioner’s right to cross-examine.

civil petition_allowed power of attorney affidavit of evidence cross-examination procedural correction

Neeru Bhalla v. B R Gambhir & Ors.

04 Jan 2023 · Tushar Rao Gedela · 2023:DHC:90

The Delhi High Court allowed the petitioner a final opportunity to lead evidence subject to payment of costs, emphasizing that cases should be decided on merits rather than procedural technicalities.

civil appeal_allowed closure of evidence opportunity to lead evidence trial court order case decided on merits

Raj Kumar v. State of Delhi and Anr.

04 Jan 2023 · Swarana Kanta Sharma · 2023:DHC:84

The Delhi High Court allowed recall of the prosecutrix for limited re-cross-examination under Section 311 Cr.P.C. to confront her with crucial evidence, emphasizing the court's duty to ensure a fair trial and just decision.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Section 311 Cr.P.C. recall of witness re-cross-examination fair trial

Yash Dev Singh Sejwal v. The State (Govt of NCT of Delhi)

03 Jan 2023 · Swarana Kanta Sharma · 2024:DHC:28
Cites 0 · Cited by 1

The Delhi High Court upheld the proclamation of the petitioner as a proclaimed offender and dismissed his petition challenging the issuance of NBWs and related orders, holding that evasion of summons and non-compliance with court orders justify such coercive measures.

criminal petition_dismissed Significant Proclaimed Offender Section 82 CrPC Non-Bailable Warrant Service of Summons

Goyal MG Gases Private Limited v. EDAC Engineering Limited

31 Dec 2022 · C. Hari Shankar · 2024:DHC:6510
Cites 2 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court held that at the stage of appointing an arbitrator under Section 11(5) of the Arbitration Act, only a prima facie existence of a valid arbitration agreement is to be examined and appointed an independent arbitrator to resolve the dispute arising from a delivery challan arbitration clause.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Section 11(5) Section 12(5) arbitration agreement

Mohd Tauseef v. State Govt. of NCT of Delhi

30 Dec 2022 · Amit Mahajan · 2022:DHC:5876

The Delhi High Court dismissed the anticipatory bail application of an accused in a serious robbery case, emphasizing the necessity of custodial interrogation and the accused's adverse antecedents.

criminal petition_dismissed Significant anticipatory bail Section 438 Cr.P.C. robbery custodial interrogation

Akshay Dhingra v. State (Govt. of NCT of Delhi)

30 Dec 2022 · Amit Mahajan · 2022:DHC:5877

The Delhi High Court dismissed the applicant's pre-arrest bail plea in a theft case involving household articles removed without the complainant wife's consent, holding that anticipatory bail is not warranted when allegations are not frivolous and investigation is ongoing.

criminal petition_dismissed Section 438 CrPC pre-arrest bail theft matrimonial dispute

Suresh Chikara v. Govt of NCT of Delhi

30 Dec 2022 · Saurabh Banerjee · 2022:DHC:5878

The Delhi High Court dismissed the son's petition challenging eviction from his father's property, holding that possession without title does not confer residence rights against the registered owner under the Maintenance and Welfare of Parents and Senior Citizens Act.

civil petition_dismissed Significant Maintenance and Welfare of Parents and Senior Citizens Act, 2007 eviction property dispute oral partition