Delhi High Court

60,983 judgments

Year:

Presto Stantest P. Ltd. v. Pacorr Testing Instruments P. Ltd. & Ors.

05 Jan 2023 · C. Hari Shankar · 2023:DHC:9461

The Delhi High Court held that service of written statement by email constitutes valid receipt triggering the mandatory 45-day limitation period for filing replication, and refused to condone delay beyond this period.

civil petition_dismissed Significant service by email limitation period condonation of delay replication

Bar Council of India v. Commissioner of Income Tax (Exemption)

05 Jan 2023 · Rajiv Shakdher; Girish Kathpalia · 2024:DHC:57-DB

The Delhi High Court allowed the writ petition and directed condonation of delay in filing Form 10 for AY 2016-17, emphasizing liberal exercise of discretion under Section 119(2)(b) of the Income Tax Act to mitigate genuine hardship.

tax petition_allowed Significant condonation of delay Form 10 Income Tax Act Section 119(2)(b)

Sh. Ram Sarup Lugani & Anr. v. Nirmal Lugani & Ors.

04 Jan 2023 · Yashwant Varma · 2023:DHC:4

The Delhi High Court allowed impleadment of additional applicants in a pending Section 92 CPC application before grant of leave, holding that the mandatory two-person requirement must be satisfied at the time of consideration and can be fulfilled by joining parties prior to leave being granted.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Section 92 CPC leave to sue public charitable trust impleadment

ARMASUISSE v. THE TRADE MARK REGISTRY & ANR.

04 Jan 2023 · C. Hari Shankar · 2023:DHC:19
Cites 2 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court upheld the registration of the 'SWISS MILITARY' trademarks and logo, rejecting objections based on false trade description, geographical indication, and international conventions, emphasizing Indian law and consumer perception.

intellectual_property appeal_dismissed Significant Trade Marks Act, 1999 false trade description geographical indication Section 9 grounds

Mohd Yaseen v. Gulzar Begum

04 Jan 2023 · Manmeet Pritam Singh Arora · 2023:DHC:22
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court held that after eviction decree, the tenant must pay use and occupation charges at prevailing market rent including arrears, rejecting unsupported oral ownership claims against registered title.

civil appeal_allowed Significant use and occupation charges eviction decree market rent registered sale deed

M/S Aero Globe Facility and Others v. Union of India and Ors

04 Jan 2023 · Prathiba M. Singh · 2023:DHC:79

The Delhi High Court upheld the disqualification of a consortium's technical bids for failing to meet turnover criteria as per tender conditions and rejected their attempt to modify the composite bid post submission.

administrative appeal_allowed Ground Handling Services Consortium bidding Tender eligibility criteria Turnover requirement

Sanjay Jain v. Directorate of Enforcement

04 Jan 2023 · Prathiba M. Singh · 2023:DHC:78

The Delhi High Court allowed a co-owner to challenge attachment and eviction notices under PMLA and granted interim protection against eviction pending the Appellate Tribunal's decision.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002 attachment order eviction notices Appellate Tribunal

Novateur Electrical & Digital Systems Pvt Ltd v. V-Guard Industries Ltd

04 Jan 2023 · C. Hari Shankar · 2023:DHC:106

The Delhi High Court granted interim injunction to the plaintiff holding that prior communication of a design concept without application to a physical article does not constitute prior publication under the Designs Act, thereby upholding the prima facie validity of the plaintiff's registered designs and finding infringement by the defendant.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Designs Act, 2000 Design registration Prior publication Section 4(b)

Vishal Pachori and Others v. The State (NCT of Delhi) and Anr

04 Jan 2023 · Dinesh Kumar Sharma · 2023:DHC:194

The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 498A, 406, and 34 IPC arising from a matrimonial dispute based on an amicable settlement, exercising its inherent powers under Section 482 Cr.P.C.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Section 482 CrPC quashing of FIR matrimonial dispute Section 498A IPC

Sh. Raju and Ors. v. The State Govt of N.C.T of Delhi

04 Jan 2023 · Dinesh Kumar Sharma · 2023:DHC:193

The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 498A, 406, and 34 IPC arising from a matrimonial dispute upon the parties' amicable settlement and exercise of inherent powers under Section 482 Cr.P.C.

criminal petition_allowed Significant Section 482 CrPC quashing of FIR matrimonial dispute Section 498A IPC

Rameshwar v. DTC

04 Jan 2023 · Najmi Waziri; Gaurang Kanth · 2023:DHC:1662-DB

The Delhi High Court upheld disciplinary action against a DTC conductor for possession of used tickets, dismissing his appeal and confirming that such possession constitutes misconduct warranting dismissal.

labor appeal_dismissed Significant Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 misconduct possession of used tickets disciplinary action

Rajan Sood v. Delhi Development Authority

04 Jan 2023 · Manmeet Pritam Singh Arora · 2023:DHC:21

The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition challenging demolition on acquired land, holding that acquisition proceedings are final, possession vested with DDA, and the petitioners' representation under Section 48 is not maintainable.

property petition_dismissed Significant Land Acquisition Act, 1894 Section 48 representation possession land acquisition lapse

Jeewan Mondal v. State NCT of Delhi

04 Jan 2023 · Anish Dayal · 2023:DHC:38
Cites 4 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court granted bail to an undertrial accused in an NDPS case detained for over five years, holding that prolonged pre-trial detention violating the right to speedy trial under Article 21 overrides the stringent bail restrictions under Section 37 of the NDPS Act.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant NDPS Act Section 37 NDPS bail speedy trial

State of NCT of Delhi v. Ram Niwas

04 Jan 2023 · Anish Dayal · 2023:DHC:35

The High Court held that a Magistrate cannot discharge an accused at the committal stage in offences triable exclusively by the Sessions Court if prima facie evidence exists, and set aside orders discharging the accused in an abetment of suicide case.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Section 209 CrPC Abetment of suicide Committal proceedings Magistrate jurisdiction

Shubha Chakravarty & Anr. v. Union of India & Ors.

04 Jan 2023 · Prathiba M. Singh · 2023:DHC:42

The Delhi High Court held that OCI prospective adoptive parents must be treated at par with resident and non-resident Indian adoptive parents in adoption priority and seniority, as mandated by the Adoption Regulations, 2022.

family petition_allowed Significant Overseas Citizen of India Prospective Adoptive Parents Central Adoption Resource Authority Adoption Regulations 2022

Hrinmoy Das v. State of Delhi NCT & Anr.

04 Jan 2023 · Dinesh Kumar Sharma · 2023:DHC:44

The Delhi High Court granted bail to the accused in a rape case after finding evidence of a possible honey trap and extortion attempt, imposing conditions to protect the prosecutrix and ensure trial integrity.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant bail Section 376 IPC rape honey trap

M/S Mahajan Industries Pvt. Ltd. v. Gaon Sabha Chattarpur

04 Jan 2023 · Mini Pushkarna, J. · 2023:DHC:46

The Delhi High Court held that once land is urbanised by government notifications and Master Plan classification, proceedings under Section 81 of the Delhi Land Reforms Act, 1954 are not maintainable and quashed the conditional decree against the petitioner’s land in Village Chattarpur.

property petition_allowed Significant Delhi Land Reforms Act, 1954 urbanisation Section 81 DLR Act Master Plan of Delhi-2021

Bhagwan Singh as Guardian of Vivek v. Govt of NCT of Delhi and Another

04 Jan 2023 · Mini Pushkarna · 2017 SCC OnLine Del 7842

Delhi High Court dismissed the petition for admission beyond the 31st December cut-off date under the RTE Act but allowed the petitioner to seek admission for the next academic session.

constitutional petition_dismissed Significant Right of Children to Free and Compulsory Education Act, 2009 Admission cut-off date Disadvantaged Group category School admission

Rajender Prasad Pant v. M/s Exchange Agencies & Anr.

04 Jan 2023 · SATISH CHANDRA SHARMA, C.J.; SUBRAMONIUM PRASAD, C.J. · 2023:DHC:61-DB

The Delhi High Court dismissed the appellant's claim for wages due to lack of documentary evidence proving employment under the Delhi Shops and Establishment Act, 1954.

labor appeal_dismissed employment relationship burden of proof oral agreement appointment letter

Dr. Anil Kumar Gupta v. Union of India & Ors.

04 Jan 2023 · Satish Chandra Sharma; Subramonium Prasad · 2023:DHC:62-DB
Cites 3 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court dismissed the writ petition holding that the petitioner, a technical employee of ICAR, was not entitled to the higher veterinary pay scale under the 5th Central Pay Commission recommendations and the Office Memorandum dated 04.05.1999, as ICAR’s own service rules govern his pay.

administrative petition_dismissed pay scale revision Indian Council of Agricultural Research Technical Service Rules Central Pay Commission