Delhi High Court
94,906 judgments
Koshar Ali v. State of Delhi
Anticipatory bail was denied to the accused involved in a conspiracy to cheat by multiple sales of the same property, as custodial interrogation was necessary for investigation.
Neeraj Bhatt v. The State (Govt. of NCT) of Delhi
The Delhi High Court allowed parole to a POCSO convict to file a Special Leave Petition, holding that the right to access legal remedies constitutes special circumstances warranting parole despite adverse jail conduct.
Hoti Lal v. State of Delhi
The Delhi High Court acquitted the appellant under Section 308 IPC due to insufficient and contradictory prosecution evidence, emphasizing the need for corroboration beyond sole testimony.
State v. Mohd. Naved @ Pilla
The Delhi High Court dismissed the State's application to cancel bail granted to the accused, holding that subsequent independent offences do not justify bail cancellation absent impact on the fair trial or violation of bail conditions.
Satya Dev Yadav v. Union of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court directed respondents to decide the petitioner’s pending representation on seniority within a stipulated time, without quashing the gradation list or altering seniority at this stage.
Kamlesh v. State
The Delhi High Court upheld the conviction of appellant for raping a 2-year-old minor, affirmed the reliability of medical and testimonial evidence despite delay and contradictions, and granted set-off benefits under Section 428 Cr.P.C. for life imprisonment.
Shabbir Malik v. State & Anr
The Delhi High Court held that minor contradictions in witness statements do not justify discharge at the charge framing stage under Section 239 Cr.P.C. and restored the charge of criminal intimidation under Section 506 IPC against the accused.
AIWA Co. Ltd. v. AIVVA Enterprises Private Limited & Ors.
The Delhi High Court confirmed an interim injunction restraining defendants from using the mark 'AIVVA', holding that use without written consent from the registered proprietor amounts to trademark infringement and passing off.
M/S GRAND AUTO CAPITAL AND ORS v. M/S JINDAL DYECHEM INDUSTRIES PVT. LTD.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the appeal challenging an ex-parte eviction decree, upholding modification of mesne profits and emphasizing expeditious resolution under the Commercial Courts Act, 2015.
MS Rangoli Resorts Private Limited & Anr. v. Government of National Capital Territory of Delhi & Ors.
The Delhi High Court directed expeditious completion of land demarcation and permitted temporary boundary wall construction post-deadline, clarifying such construction does not confer rights if land is forest land.
Presto Stantest P. Ltd. v. Pacorr Testing Instruments P. Ltd. & Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that service of written statement by email constitutes valid receipt triggering the mandatory 45-day limitation period for filing replication, and refused to condone delay beyond this period.
Bar Council of India v. Commissioner of Income Tax (Exemption)
The Delhi High Court allowed the writ petition and directed condonation of delay in filing Form 10 for AY 2016-17, emphasizing liberal exercise of discretion under Section 119(2)(b) of the Income Tax Act to mitigate genuine hardship.
Sh. Ram Sarup Lugani & Anr. v. Nirmal Lugani & Ors.
The Delhi High Court allowed impleadment of additional applicants in a pending Section 92 CPC application before grant of leave, holding that the mandatory two-person requirement must be satisfied at the time of consideration and can be fulfilled by joining parties prior to leave being granted.
ARMASUISSE v. THE TRADE MARK REGISTRY & ANR.
The Delhi High Court upheld the registration of the 'SWISS MILITARY' trademarks and logo, rejecting objections based on false trade description, geographical indication, and international conventions, emphasizing Indian law and consumer perception.
Mohd Yaseen v. Gulzar Begum
The Delhi High Court held that after eviction decree, the tenant must pay use and occupation charges at prevailing market rent including arrears, rejecting unsupported oral ownership claims against registered title.
M/S Aero Globe Facility and Others v. Union of India and Ors
The Delhi High Court upheld the disqualification of a consortium's technical bids for failing to meet turnover criteria as per tender conditions and rejected their attempt to modify the composite bid post submission.
Sanjay Jain v. Directorate of Enforcement
The Delhi High Court allowed a co-owner to challenge attachment and eviction notices under PMLA and granted interim protection against eviction pending the Appellate Tribunal's decision.
Novateur Electrical & Digital Systems Pvt Ltd v. V-Guard Industries Ltd
The Delhi High Court granted interim injunction to the plaintiff holding that prior communication of a design concept without application to a physical article does not constitute prior publication under the Designs Act, thereby upholding the prima facie validity of the plaintiff's registered designs and finding infringement by the defendant.
Vishal Pachori and Others v. The State (NCT of Delhi) and Anr
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 498A, 406, and 34 IPC arising from a matrimonial dispute based on an amicable settlement, exercising its inherent powers under Section 482 Cr.P.C.
Sh. Raju and Ors. v. The State Govt of N.C.T of Delhi
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 498A, 406, and 34 IPC arising from a matrimonial dispute upon the parties' amicable settlement and exercise of inherent powers under Section 482 Cr.P.C.