Anil Kumar v. Union of India and Ors.

Delhi High Court · 08 Feb 2023 · 2023:DHC:929-DB
Suresh Kumar Kait; Neena Bansal Krishna
W.P.(C) 1619/2023
2023:DHC:929-DB
administrative petition_allowed

AI Summary

The Delhi High Court directed the respondents to treat the petitioner's legal notice as a representation and decide it within four weeks, ensuring timely administrative action.

Full Text
Translation output
NEUTRAL CITATION NUMBER: 2023/DHC/000929
W.P.(C) 1619/2023
HIGH COURT OF DELHI
Date of Decision: 08th February, 2023
W.P.(C) 1619/2023
ANIL KUMAR..... Petitioner
Through: Mr. Ankur Chhibber & Ms. Samridhi Bhatt, Advocates.
VERSUS
UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. ..... Respondents
Through: Mr. G.D. Sharma, Sr. Panel Counsel with Mr. Deepak Tanwar, Govt. Pleader &
A.S.I./GD Sanjiv Kr. Singh, CRPF.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURESH KUMAR KAIT
HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NEENA BANSAL KRISHNA
JUDGMENT
(oral)

1. Vide the present petition, the petitioner is seeking following relief: “(i) Issue a Writ of Mandamus directing the Respondents to decide and dispose off the legal notice dated 26.04.2022 preferred by the Petitioner in an expeditious and time bound manner.”

2. We hereby dispose of the present petition directing the respondents to treat the Legal Notice dated 26.04.2022 preferred by the petitioner as a representation and decide the same within four weeks from today and the decision so taken shall be communicated to the petitioner in writing within one week thereafter.

NEUTRAL CITATION NUMBER: 2023/DHC/000929 W.P.(C) 1619/2023

3. The petition is disposed of.

4. Needless to say, if the petitioner is aggrieved by the decision of the respondents, he may challenge the same before the appropriate forum.

(SURESH KUMAR KAIT) JUDGE (NEENA BANSAL KRISHNA)

JUDGE FEBRUARY 08, 2023 S.Sharma