Delhi High Court
63,002 judgments
Amitabh Gupta v. Union of India & Anr.
The Delhi High Court disposed of the writ petition on withdrawal with directions to the respondents to decide the petitioner's pending representations on promotion relaxation within a stipulated time frame.
Praveen Bansal v. Income Tax Officer Ward 29-1 & Anr.
The Delhi High Court directed the Assessing Officer to verify the petitioner’s belated reply and provide personal hearing before passing the final assessment order under Section 148A of the Income Tax Act, 1961.
Chirag Ahuja v. The State of NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 498A, 406, 34 IPC and Dowry Prohibition Act following an amicable settlement and mutual divorce between the parties, exercising its inherent powers under Section 482 Cr.P.C.
Dr Geeta Sharma v. Steel Authority of India Limited & Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the writ petition challenging the Tribunal's adjournment order, directing continuation of the hearing before the same Bench on the fixed date.
Faheem Ahmed v. The State (NCT of Delhi) and Anr.
The Delhi High Court granted anticipatory bail to petitioners accused of serious offences, holding that seriousness alone cannot deny bail if the accused cooperates and does not pose a risk to the investigation.
N K Sareen v. The Registrar of Cooperative Societies & Anr.
The Delhi High Court held that a cooperative society cannot charge compound interest on dues without justification and allowed the petitioner to pay the amount calculated with simple interest as per the Chartered Accountant's report.
Mask Consultants Pvt. Ltd. v. Income Tax Officer and Anr.
The Delhi High Court set aside the order under Section 148A(d) of the Income Tax Act for non-consideration of the assessee's reply and directed the Assessing Officer to grant a fresh personal hearing.
Sh Ashish Chhabra & Ors. v. The State & Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed a matrimonial FIR under Sections 498A/406/34 IPC following an amicable settlement and reconciliation between the parties, emphasizing the court's power to prevent abuse of process in such cases.
Master Medhansh Jhawar @ Madhav v. Rajesh Bhushan & Ors.
The Delhi High Court recognized the State's obligation to provide adequate treatment for rare disease patients, directed detailed data submission, and underscored the need for enhanced government action and innovative solutions.
Sachin Arora v. Manju Arora
The Delhi High Court upheld the Family Court's order directing production of hotel and mobile records in a divorce petition alleging adultery, holding that the right to privacy is not absolute and must yield to the right to a fair trial under Section 14 of the Family Courts Act.
Mohd. Farhan v. State
The Delhi High Court upheld the conviction under Sections 341 and 354 IPC based on credible complainant testimony despite minor discrepancies, dismissing the revision petition.
Rachana v. Shreeram General Insurance Co. Ltd. & Ors.
The Delhi High Court upheld the finality of a Lok Adalat award and dismissed the writ petition challenging it, reaffirming that such awards can only be set aside on grounds of proven fraud or coercion.
Union of India and Ors. v. Ex HFL Pankaj Kumar
The Delhi High Court upheld the Armed Forces Tribunal’s grant of disability pension for Primary Hypertension, affirming that the burden lies on the employer to prove non-attribution to military service and limiting writ interference to errors of law apparent on record.
Union of India and Ors. v. Ex JWO Bikram Kumar Singh
The Delhi High Court upheld the Armed Forces Tribunal’s grant of disability pension for Primary Hypertension, affirming the presumption that disabilities arising during service are service-connected unless rebutted by the employer.
Indian Oil Corporation Ltd v. Micro Small and Medium Enterprises Facilitation Council & Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that MSME registration obtained after contract completion does not confer retrospective benefits under the MSMED Act, setting aside the arbitration reference by the Facilitation Council.
Sanjay Jain v. Directorate of Enforcement
The Delhi High Court dismissed the appeal as withdrawn, directing the Adjudicating Authority to independently consider all valuation and related issues afresh at the final hearing under the PMLA.
Himmat Singh & Ors. v. Union of India & Anr.
The Delhi High Court directed the BSF to decide the petitioners' representation for MACP benefits and arrears in accordance with a prior judgment within eight weeks, dismissing the writ petition.
Delhi Metro Rail Corporation Ltd v. MS Parasvnath Developers Ltd
The Delhi High Court held that a suit alleging latent defects discovered after a conciliation settlement is maintainable and not barred by limitation, dismissing the defendant's application to reject the plaint under Order VII Rule 11 CPC.
Rakesh and Ors. v. The State and Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 498A, 406, and 34 IPC arising from matrimonial disputes following an amicable settlement and mutual consent divorce, exercising its inherent powers under Section 482 CrPC.
S.S. CON-BUILD PVT LTD v. Delhi Development Authority
Disputes relating to lease termination and arrears under the Public Premises Act are non-arbitrable and fall exclusively within the jurisdiction of the Estate Officer, barring arbitration or civil court proceedings.