Delhi High Court
63,002 judgments
Ranbir Singh Sehrawat v. Delhi Development Authority
The Delhi High Court remanded a service matter to the Tribunal for reconsideration of the petitioner’s Grade Pay entitlement after the respondents failed to justify their policy decision reducing it from ₹4,200 to ₹2,800.
Satish Kumar Gaur v. Principal District and Sessions Judge
Delhi High Court directs full reimbursement of COVID-19 medical expenses to a retired government employee under DGEHS, allowing government to recover any excess charges from the hospital.
Ramesh Abhishek v. Lokpal of India & Anr.
Delhi High Court dismissed the petition challenging Lokpal's orders directing ED inquiry into disproportionate assets, holding that Lokpal has jurisdiction to order preliminary inquiry and judicial interference at this stage is unwarranted.
PEC LIMITED v. SH. DHARAM VEER SINGH AND ORS.
The Delhi High Court directed deferral of gratuity claim proceedings pending disposal of a related appeal and ordered expeditious hearing and litigation costs.
Sonu Lal Gupta v. Union Public Service Commission
Delhi High Court held that teaching experience during deputation at SCERT qualifies as requisite teaching experience for UPSC Principal recruitment and set aside rejection of petitioners' candidature.
Delhi Transport Corporation v. Vinod Kumar
The Delhi High Court upheld the Labour Court's award directing full back wages for the period of delayed reinstatement beyond the Tribunal's order, emphasizing that an employer cannot benefit from its own wrongful delay.
PEC LIMITED v. SH FATEH CHAND AND OTHER
The Delhi High Court directed deferral of a gratuity claim hearing pending disposal of a related appeal to avoid multiplicity of litigation and ordered time-bound disposal of the appeal with litigation expenses awarded.
Mukesh Joshi v. Manju Lata Joshi
The Delhi High Court allowed the appeal to set aside a prior judgment and permitted amendment of the petition for divorce by mutual consent under the Hindu Marriage Act, waiving the statutory waiting period due to prolonged separation.
Poonam Chaturvedi v. Manas Chaturvedi
The Delhi High Court disposed of the appeal by recording the lawful settlement between parties on custody of minor children and mutual consent divorce, declaring the appellant as lawful guardian and directing the Family Court to consider waiver of the statutory period under Section 13B(2) of the Hindu Marriage Act.
Tofik Alam & Ors. v. State (NCT of Delhi) & Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 354, 323, 509, 34 IPC and Section 12 POCSO Act based on an amicable settlement between the parties, exercising its inherent powers under Section 482 CrPC.
Prajna Sarathi Jena v. Union of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court directed an independent medical board to reassess the petitioner's fitness for CISF recruitment after conflicting medical reports, holding the board's report final and allowing further selection if found fit.
Rakesh Kumar v. The State (Govt. of NCT of Delhi) and Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under the Indian Electricity Act on the ground of settlement between parties and absence of chargesheet, exercising its inherent powers under Section 482 Cr.P.C.
Colonel NC Dwivedi v. Union of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court stayed the Court of Inquiry against Colonel Dwivedi pending disposal of the Armed Forces Tribunal proceedings, holding that DoPT guidelines on anonymous complaints do not bind Courts of Inquiry under the Army Act.
Deepak Yadav & Ors. v. The State & Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 498A, 406, 34 IPC and Dowry Prohibition Act following an amicable settlement and mutual consent divorce, holding that continuing criminal proceedings serves no purpose.
Aditya N Prasad v. Col Ajay Gautam & Ors.
The Delhi High Court approved the remedial plan for tree protection during construction on defence land and closed the contempt petition accordingly.
Pallavi Deva & Anr. v. Vijay Saxena
The Delhi High Court held that maintenance paid for a past period under a settlement cannot be adjusted against future claims and ordered interim maintenance from the date of the application for a special needs child.
Mamta Rani & Anr v. Renu Rani
The Delhi High Court allowed the petitioners to examine their witness despite late appearance due to counsel's prior engagement, emphasizing the need for fair opportunity before closing evidence.
M/S. RK AGROEXPORT PRIVATE LIMITED v. UNION OF INDIA & ORS.
The Delhi High Court allowed correction of inadvertent errors in shipping bills under MEIS by directing respondents to follow DGFT's advisory for post-Export General Manifest amendments and grant export benefits accordingly.
Yogesh Sharma @ Yogi v. State
The Delhi High Court upheld the conviction and life sentence of the appellant for murder based on circumstantial evidence, failure to explain facts under Section 106 Evidence Act, and corroborative forensic and witness testimony.
Directorate of Enforcement v. Satyendar Kumar Jain
The Delhi High Court held that an accused under PMLA does not have a right to have his lawyer present during recording of statements unless there is a real apprehension of coercion, and set aside the direction allowing counsel's presence at a safe distance during interrogation.