Delhi High Court
58,104 judgments
Union of India v. 672796 HFO Banshidhar Gairola
The High Court upheld the Armed Forces Tribunal's grant of disability pension for Primary Hypertension, affirming the presumption that disabilities not recorded at entry are service-related unless rebutted by the employer.
Global Tech Fab v. Government of NCT Delhi & Anr
Delhi High Court allowed the petitioner to file an appeal without further pre-deposit, set aside provisional attachment, and deferred the validity of CGST notifications pending Supreme Court ruling.
Reetika v. Rajinder Kumar Jindal & Anr
The Delhi High Court upheld the Family Court's limited visitation rights granted to grandparents and financial safeguarding directions for the minor child, dismissing the mother's appeal for interference.
Ram Ashish v. The Union of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that retrospective cancellation of GST registration without prior notice and reasoned order is impermissible and directed cancellation to be effective only from the date of the Show Cause Notice, while ordering disposal of the pending appeal with a personal hearing.
Metallicz Media Private Limited v. Union of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court remanded a GST adjudication matter for fresh hearing after holding that the petitioner was denied natural justice, while leaving the validity of the impugned notifications pending before the Supreme Court.
Sunil Kumar Gupta v. Commissioner of Customs
The Delhi High Court held that failure to issue a Show Cause Notice within the statutory period under Section 110 of the Customs Act mandates unconditional release of seized goods without penalty.
M/S Stalwart India Alloys Limited v. Union of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court set aside the retrospective cancellation of GST registration for lack of procedural fairness and directed a fresh hearing after re-inspection, reaffirming that retrospective cancellation is impermissible without explicit notice.
Chandra Prakash v. State NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court upheld the acquittal of accused in a Section 308 IPC case, emphasizing the double presumption of innocence and the need for appellate restraint in disturbing trial court acquittals amid contradictory evidence.
Sanjay Kumar v. Union of India & Anr.
The Delhi High Court directed the Union of India to decide the petitioner’s clemency petition within six weeks, reserving the petitioner’s right to challenge the decision thereafter.
Venkateswaran v. Union of India
A writ petition seeking antedating of seniority was dismissed for non-impleadment of affected parties, reaffirming the necessity to implead all persons whose seniority would be disrupted.
Union of India & Ors. v. CDR PC Acharya (Retd) (01992-A)
The Delhi High Court upheld the Armed Forces Tribunal's grant of disability pension for Cervical Spondylosis, affirming the presumption of service connection and limiting writ interference to errors of law.
Deutsche Lufthansa AG v. Ms Manisha Thakur & Ors.
The Delhi High Court allowed the writ petition directing the Industrial Tribunal to permit the management to adduce evidence in a Section 33-A complaint and dispose of the matter expeditiously, emphasizing fair opportunity and natural justice.
MS KAMLA BHEL CO PVT LTD v. SMT SUNITA MEHTA & ORS
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petitioner's application for restoration of a writ petition dismissed for non-prosecution due to inordinate delay and lack of sufficient cause, holding that negligence of counsel alone does not justify condonation of delay without petitioner’s proactive conduct.
The State Govt of NCT of Delhi v. Damandeep Chawla & Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the State's appeal and upheld the acquittal of accused in a robbery and dacoity case due to lack of credible evidence and procedural lapses.
Union of India & Anr. v. GP Capt Amitabh Mathur (Retd)
The Delhi High Court dismissed the Union of India's petition and upheld the Armed Forces Tribunal's grant of disability pension for Primary Hypertension, affirming the presumption of service connection and the limited scope of certiorari jurisdiction.
Vivek v. Union of India & Anr.
The Delhi High Court transferred a writ petition filed by a person with disability to the Central Administrative Tribunal, holding that the Tribunal has exclusive jurisdiction under Section 19 of the Administrative Tribunals Act, 1985.
Institute of Human Behaviour and Allied Sciences v. MI2C Securities and Facilities Pvt Ltd
The Delhi High Court upheld correction of a typographical error in an arbitral award beyond the 30-day limit under Section 33(1)(a) of the Arbitration Act, applying the principle that tribunal errors should not prejudice parties.
Prajwal Elroy Raj v. Govt of NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petitioner's bail application under the NDPS Act, holding that stringent bail conditions were not met given prima facie evidence of his key role in a narcotics trafficking syndicate using cryptocurrency and dark web.
Deepak v. State Govt. of NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court upheld the conviction under Section 377 IPC for anal intercourse with a minor, affirming that slight penetration suffices for the offence and that delay in FIR and minor inconsistencies do not vitiate the prosecution case.
Naveen v. State (NCT of Delhi)
The Delhi High Court upheld the appellant's conviction for robbery and grievous injury but modified the sentence to release him on probation under the Probation of Offenders Act, recognizing the court's discretion despite mandatory minimum sentencing under Section 397 IPC.