Delhi High Court

103,150 judgments

Year:

Through: Mr. Nipun Joshi, Advocate v. OM PRAKASH GARG

10 Feb 2026 · HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ JAIN · 2026:DHC:1156

BLE MS. JUSTICE MANMEET PRITAM SINGH ARORA v. KAMESWAR RAO

10 Feb 2026 · HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V. KAMESWAR RAO; HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MAN... · 2026:DHC:1126-DB

Rhino Finance Private Limited v. Golden Bag Technology Private Limited

09 Feb 2026 · Harish Vaidyanathan Shankar · 2026:DHC:1118
Cites 7 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition challenging the arbitral award as barred by limitation, holding that electronic delivery of a signed award triggers the limitation period under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

civil petition_dismissed Significant Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Section 34 limitation Delivery of arbitral award Electronic service

The Deputy Director, Directorate of Enforcement v. JM Financial Asset Reconstruction Co.

09 Feb 2026 · Navin Chawla; Ravinder Dudeja · 2026:DHC:1168-DB
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court upheld the quashing of attachment of mortgage properties not purchased from proceeds of crime and directed their restoration to the Resolution Applicant under PMLA in light of insolvency proceedings.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002 attachment of property mortgage properties proceeds of crime

Ex-Constable Virender Singh v. Union of India

09 Feb 2026 · C. Hari Shankar; Om Prakash Shukla · 2026:DHC:1115-DB
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court held that a government servant who voluntarily retires with a disability aggravated by service is entitled to disability pension under CCS (EOP) Rules, distinguishing the case from Army Pension Regulations and dismissing the review petition.

administrative petition_dismissed Significant disability pension voluntary retirement Central Civil Services (Extraordinary Pension) Rules Army Pension Regulations

At-Baani Corporate One Tower Suite # 303, 3rd Floor Plot No. 5, District Commercial Centre v. M/S Vyagrah Infrastructures Pvt. Ltd.

09 Feb 2026 · Neena Bansal Krishna · 2026:DHC:1106
Cites 3 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court held that Non-Executive Independent Directors cannot be held liable under Section 138 NI Act without specific material showing control, but the CFO can be summoned, partially quashing the complaint against some directors.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Section 138 Negotiable Instruments Act Independent Director liability Companies Act 2013 Section 149 Chief Financial Officer liability

Amit Goyal v. State of NCT of Delhi

09 Feb 2026 · Neena Bansal Krishna · 2026:DHC:1109

The Delhi High Court quashed the FIR and criminal proceedings against Amit Goyal and Dharmender Yadav under Sections 420, 467, 468, 471, 120B, and 34 IPC following an amicable settlement and absence of specific incriminating role.

criminal petition_allowed Significant Section 482 CrPC quashing of FIR forgery cheating

Airports Authority of India v. URC Construction (P) Ltd.

09 Feb 2026 · Neena Bansal Krishna · 2026:DHC:1105

The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition challenging the arbitral award granting compensation for delay and escalation in a construction contract, holding the arbitrator’s findings as a plausible view not warranting interference under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

civil petition_dismissed Significant Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Section 34 challenge Patent illegality Public policy

BSES Rajdhani Power Ltd. v. Deepak Thakur

09 Feb 2026 · Neena Bansal Krishna · 2026:DHC:1103

The Delhi High Court dismissed BSES's appeal against acquittal of Deepak Thakur for alleged electricity theft due to insufficient evidence and procedural lapses in the prosecution's case.

criminal appeal_dismissed electricity theft Section 135 Electricity Act, 2003 inspection procedure identification of accused

Narinder Kumar Trading as M/s Kundan Trading Company v. Kyoto Tool Co. Ltd. & Ors.

09 Feb 2026 · C. Hari Shankar; Om Prakash Shukla · 2026:DHC:1094-DB

The High Court allowed the appellant to withdraw the civil appeal and disposed of it accordingly without adjudicating on the merits.

civil appeal_allowed appeal withdrawal leave to withdraw appeal disposal of appeal civil appeal

Rekha Dewan v. Government of NCT of Delhi & Ors.

09 Feb 2026 · C. Hari Shankar; Om Prakash Shukla · 2026:DHC:1090-DB

The Delhi High Court dismissed a writ petition as not maintainable that sought to uphold a Tribunal judgment and quash a government circular relating to pension benefits already decided by the Tribunal.

administrative petition_dismissed Central Administrative Tribunal Writ Petition Old Pension Scheme CCS Pension Rules, 1972

Aarti Sharma v. State

09 Feb 2026 · Manoj Jain · 2026:DHC:1137
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court allowed withdrawal of a petition challenging cognizance under Section 186 IPC, granting liberty to raise the statutory complaint issue under Section 195 Cr.P.C. at final arguments before the Trial Court.

criminal petition_dismissed Procedural Section 186 IPC Section 195 CrPC cognizance complaint requirement

Sohail Saifi & Ors. v. State (NCT of Delhi) & Anr.

09 Feb 2026 · Manoj Jain · 2026:DHC:1136

The Delhi High Court quashed a matrimonial dispute FIR under BNS/IPC offences based on a voluntary compromise and the complainant's withdrawal, exercising inherent powers under Section 528 BNSS.

criminal petition_allowed quashing of FIR matrimonial dispute compromise Section 528 BNSS

Shabab Alam v. State Govt of NCT of Delhi & Anr.

09 Feb 2026 · Manoj Jain · 2026:DHC:1135

The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR and all proceedings under Sections 376 and 354 IPC based on a compromise between the parties, exercising its inherent powers under Section 482 CrPC.

criminal petition_allowed quashing of FIR compromise Section 376 IPC Section 354 IPC

Shri Chand Gautam & Anr. v. Govt of NCT of Delhi & Ors.

09 Feb 2026 · Devendra Kumar Upadhyaya, CJ; Tejas Karia, J · 2026:DHC:1539-DB

The Delhi High Court dismissed the appeal challenging the rejection of eviction of son and daughter-in-law from senior citizens' self-acquired property under the Maintenance and Welfare of Parents and Senior Citizens Act, 2007, holding that eviction requires proof of harassment and that writ jurisdiction does not permit reappraisal of factual findings.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant Maintenance and Welfare of Parents and Senior Citizens Act, 2007 eviction senior citizens self-acquired property

Sameer Khan & Anr. v. State (NCT of Delhi) & Anr.

09 Feb 2026 · Manoj Jain · 2026:DHC:1133

The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 498-A, 406, and 34 IPC arising from a matrimonial dispute based on the parties' amicable settlement and the complainant's consent.

criminal petition_allowed quashing of FIR Section 498-A IPC matrimonial dispute compromise