Delhi High Court
94,045 judgments
MMTC Limited v. Aust Grain Exports Pty. Ltd.
The Delhi High Court upheld the arbitral award rejecting the petitioner's claims for liquidated damages due to mutual extension of shipment period and found no grounds under Section 34 of the Arbitration Act to interfere with the award.
FIITJEE Limited v. ALLEN Education and Management Services Pvt. Ltd & Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed FIITJEE's application for interim injunction restraining rival coaching institutes from claiming credit for a student's JEE Mains success, holding the petitioner failed to establish a strong prima facie case or irreparable injury.
PEE Empro Exports Pvt. Ltd. v. United India Insurance Co. Ltd.
The Delhi High Court held that a valid arbitration agreement survives execution of a discharge voucher and appointed a sole arbitrator to adjudicate the dispute over the quantum of an insurance claim.
Sameer Mahandru v. Directorate of Enforcement
Delhi High Court granted interim bail on medical grounds to a petitioner under PMLA proviso for 'sick or infirm' persons, emphasizing the right to adequate medical treatment despite the seriousness of the offence.
Yogesh Kumar v. Davender Kumar Relan and Ors
The Delhi High Court dismissed the plaintiff's application to strike off unauthorized amendments in the defendants' written statement but imposed costs for procedural violations, holding that amendments beyond the amended plaint require prior court permission.
M/S. A.G. ENVIRO INFRA PROJECTS PVT. LTD. v. M/S. J.S. ENVIRO SERVICES PVT. LTD.
The Delhi High Court upheld the arbitral award in a municipal solid waste management dispute, affirming limited judicial interference under Section 34 of the Arbitration Act and rejecting the petitioner’s challenge on grounds of patent illegality and public policy.
Delhi Development Authority v. SH K R Anand & Anr.
The Delhi High Court upheld the arbitral award, dismissing the petition challenging it on limitation and patent illegality grounds, reaffirming the limited scope of judicial interference under Section 34 of the Arbitration Act.
Ansari v. State (Govt. of NCT of Delhi)
The Delhi High Court held that it has concurrent jurisdiction to grant anticipatory bail under Section 438 CrPC without prior approach to Sessions Court and granted interim protection to the applicant not named in the ECIR, emphasizing discretionary application of PMLA's twin conditions.
Ansari v. State (Govt. of NCT of Delhi)
The Delhi High Court granted anticipatory bail to Basant Bansal in a PMLA money laundering case, affirming the High Court's concurrent jurisdiction under Section 438 CrPC and clarifying that the twin conditions under Section 45 PMLA do not absolutely bar bail where the applicant is not named in the ECIR and has cooperated with investigation.
M/S IHT Network Limited v. Sachin Bhardwaj
The Delhi High Court partly allowed the appeal, holding the franchisee entitled to refund and damages for breach of contract within limitation, and dismissed perjury allegations for lack of impact on justice.
Suhail Haj and Umrah Tours v. Union of India
The Delhi High Court stayed the suspension of a Haj Group Organizer's registration and quota to protect pilgrims' constitutional right to undertake Haj pilgrimage while allowing investigation against the organizer to proceed.
Rangesh Srinivasan v. Madhulika Bawa
The Delhi High Court held that the general directions in Rajeev Preenja requiring deposit of entire interim maintenance as a precondition to stay or entertain revision/appeal are not sustainable, and remanded the matter for fresh consideration of stay application on merits.
Benzy Tours and Travels Pvt Ltd. & Anr. v. Union of India
The Delhi High Court stayed the suspension of Haj Group Organizers' registration and quota allocation to protect pilgrims' fundamental right to undertake Haj pilgrimage pending investigation into alleged misrepresentations.
AL AMAL HAJJ UMRA SERVICE v. UNION OF INDIA
Delhi High Court stayed suspension of Haj Group Organizer's registration and quota to protect pilgrims' fundamental right to undertake Haj pilgrimage while allowing investigation to proceed.
AL TAWAF HAJJ AND UMRAH TRAVEL AND TOURISM v. UNION OF INDIA
The Delhi High Court stayed the suspension of a Haj Group Organizer's registration and quota allocation to protect pilgrims' fundamental right to undertake the Haj pilgrimage under Article 25, while allowing investigation to proceed.
Njath Khidmathul Hujjaj v. Union of India
The Delhi High Court stayed the suspension of a Haj Group Organizer's registration and quota allocation to protect pilgrims' constitutional right to undertake Haj pilgrimage pending investigation of alleged misrepresentation.
AL HIDAYA HAJJ SERVICE v. UNION OF INDIA
Delhi High Court stayed suspension of Haj Group Organizer's registration and quota to protect pilgrims' constitutional right to undertake Haj pilgrimage while allowing investigation to proceed.
PKM Travels Yaseen Haj Group v. Union of India
The Delhi High Court stayed the suspension of a Haj Group Organizer's registration and quota to protect pilgrims' fundamental right to undertake Haj pilgrimage under Article 25, while allowing investigation to proceed.
Altima Tours and Travels Pvt Ltd v. Union of India
The Delhi High Court stayed the suspension of a Haj Group Organizer's registration and quota to protect pilgrims' constitutional right to undertake Haj pilgrimage while allowing investigation to proceed.
AL-MABROOK HAJJ GROUP SOCIAL TOURS AND TRAVELS v. UNION OF INDIA
Delhi High Court stayed suspension of Haj Group Organizer's registration and quota to protect pilgrims' constitutional right to undertake Haj pilgrimage while allowing investigation to proceed.