Delhi High Court
63,782 judgments
Dr. Ranjan Agrawala v. University of Delhi
The Delhi High Court held that a postgraduate medical student who left the course midway and failed to complete mandatory training within the prescribed span period is not entitled to complete the course or avail special examination chances offered by the university.
Dr Sohail Malik v. Union of India & Anr.
The Delhi High Court held that the Sexual Harassment of Women at Workplace Act, 2013 applies to complaints against employees of different government departments, affirming ICC jurisdiction beyond departmental boundaries.
Maa Saraswati Pvt ITI Anr v. Directorate General of Training Ministry of Skill Development and Entrepreneurship Kaushal Bhawan & Anr
The Delhi High Court directed the Directorate of Employment and Training, Bihar, to promptly communicate its decision on the NOC to enable the DGT to process the petitioners' application for establishing a training institute without further delay.
Parvesh Kumar Verma v. Kailash Narain Malhotra
The Delhi High Court held that a tenant must pay use and occupation charges at a fair market rate from the date of an Eviction Order until final disposal, directing payment of Rs. 18,000 to Rs. 30,000 monthly during the pendency of the petition.
Murari Chauhan & Anr v. Kailash Narain Malhotra
The Delhi High Court held that a tenant must pay use and occupation charges at a market-adjusted rate from the date of an eviction order during the pendency of the eviction petition, conditioning interim stay on timely payment.
Arun Gupta v. M/S Swami Hari Sharna Nand Charitable Trust
The Delhi High Court held that a tenant occupying premises after an Eviction Order must pay use and occupation charges at market rates during the pendency of eviction proceedings, conditioning interim protection on timely payment.
Murari Chauhan & Anr v. Kailash Narain Malhotra
The Delhi High Court held that a tenant must pay use and occupation charges at market rate from the date of an Eviction Order during the pendency of the eviction petition, conditioning interim protection on such payments.
Babu Lal Bhawariya v. State of NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petitioner's bail application in a sexual offence case involving a minor prosecutrix, holding that credible prosecutrix testimony and forensic evidence justified denial of bail pending trial.
Jagmohan Singh v. Municipal Corporation of Delhi
The Delhi High Court allowed the petitioner to file an appeal within ten days against a demolition order and restrained the MCD from taking demolition action pending the appeal tribunal's decision on the stay application.
Mukesh Malik v. Union of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the writ petition challenging compulsory retirement of a CISF officer, upholding dismissal of his appeal and revision petitions on grounds of delay without sufficient cause.
Preeti Chandra v. Directorate of Enforcement
The Delhi High Court granted bail to Preeti Chandra in a PMLA money laundering case, holding that the proviso to Section 45(1) applies to women accused and that mens rea must be established beyond mere directorship or spousal relation.
MMTC Limited v. Aust Grain Exports Pty. Ltd.
The Delhi High Court upheld the arbitral award rejecting the petitioner's claims for liquidated damages due to mutual extension of shipment period and found no grounds under Section 34 of the Arbitration Act to interfere with the award.
FIITJEE Limited v. ALLEN Education and Management Services Pvt. Ltd & Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed FIITJEE's application for interim injunction restraining rival coaching institutes from claiming credit for a student's JEE Mains success, holding the petitioner failed to establish a strong prima facie case or irreparable injury.
PEE Empro Exports Pvt. Ltd. v. United India Insurance Co. Ltd.
The Delhi High Court held that a valid arbitration agreement survives execution of a discharge voucher and appointed a sole arbitrator to adjudicate the dispute over the quantum of an insurance claim.
Sameer Mahandru v. Directorate of Enforcement
Delhi High Court granted interim bail on medical grounds to a petitioner under PMLA proviso for 'sick or infirm' persons, emphasizing the right to adequate medical treatment despite the seriousness of the offence.
Yogesh Kumar v. Davender Kumar Relan and Ors
The Delhi High Court dismissed the plaintiff's application to strike off unauthorized amendments in the defendants' written statement but imposed costs for procedural violations, holding that amendments beyond the amended plaint require prior court permission.
M/S. A.G. ENVIRO INFRA PROJECTS PVT. LTD. v. M/S. J.S. ENVIRO SERVICES PVT. LTD.
The Delhi High Court upheld the arbitral award in a municipal solid waste management dispute, affirming limited judicial interference under Section 34 of the Arbitration Act and rejecting the petitioner’s challenge on grounds of patent illegality and public policy.
Delhi Development Authority v. SH K R Anand & Anr.
The Delhi High Court upheld the arbitral award, dismissing the petition challenging it on limitation and patent illegality grounds, reaffirming the limited scope of judicial interference under Section 34 of the Arbitration Act.
Ansari v. State (Govt. of NCT of Delhi)
The Delhi High Court held that it has concurrent jurisdiction to grant anticipatory bail under Section 438 CrPC without prior approach to Sessions Court and granted interim protection to the applicant not named in the ECIR, emphasizing discretionary application of PMLA's twin conditions.
Ansari v. State (Govt. of NCT of Delhi)
The Delhi High Court granted anticipatory bail to Basant Bansal in a PMLA money laundering case, affirming the High Court's concurrent jurisdiction under Section 438 CrPC and clarifying that the twin conditions under Section 45 PMLA do not absolutely bar bail where the applicant is not named in the ECIR and has cooperated with investigation.