Delhi High Court

94,045 judgments

Year:

Chaalak Shakti v. GNCTD & Anr.

02 Jun 2023 · Suresh Kumar Kait; Neena Bansal Krishna · 2023:DHC:4073-DB

The Delhi High Court dismissed a contempt appeal as not maintainable but disposed it on respondents' assurance to comply with the original order, warning of contempt for non-compliance.

administrative appeal_dismissed Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 Section 19 contempt proceedings appeal maintainability

Shivam Chaudhary & Ors. v. All India Council for Technical Education & Ors.

02 Jun 2023 · Purushaindra Kumar Kaurav · 2023:DHC:4021

The Delhi High Court held that AICTE's 2007 lateral entry regulations are directory and not mandatory on public universities, dismissing the petition seeking compulsory lateral entry admissions for diploma holders.

constitutional petition_dismissed Significant AICTE Regulations 2007 lateral entry admission technical education universities autonomy

Malvinder Mohan Singh v. State (NCT of Delhi) & Anr.

02 Jun 2023 · Dinesh Kumar Sharma · 2023:DHC:4078

The High Court set aside a revisional order canceling bail for lack of notice to the accused, emphasizing mandatory notice requirements under Sections 399(2) and 401(2) Cr.P.C.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Section 482 Cr.P.C. Section 399(2) Cr.P.C. Section 401(2) Cr.P.C. revisional jurisdiction

R K Tarun v. National Medical Commission & Ors.

02 Jun 2023 · Satish Chandra Sharma; Subramonium Prasad · 2023:DHC:4058-DB

The Delhi High Court dismissed a PIL alleging fraudulent claims by UCMS regarding its Department of Respiratory Medicine, holding that the department exists and functions as per regulatory requirements.

constitutional petition_dismissed Public Interest Litigation Medical College Regulation National Medical Commission Department of Respiratory Medicine

Amina v. State NCT of Delhi

02 Jun 2023 · Anish Dayal · 2023:DHC:4024
Cites 5 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court granted bail to the petitioner in an NDPS case, holding that improper sampling procedure violating mandatory Standing Orders created reasonable doubt warranting bail.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant NDPS Act bail sampling procedure Standing Order 1/88

Subhash Chand Gupta v. Tahir (Prop of M/s Reshma Enterprises)

02 Jun 2023 · Manmohan; Saurabh Banerjee · 2023:DHC:4471-DB

The Delhi High Court dismissed the appellant’s appeal in a suit for recovery of Rs.40,50,000/- holding that the admitted receipt of money with assurance of repayment creates liability irrespective of unrelated agreements with third parties.

civil appeal_dismissed loan recovery scrap dealing business Order I Rule 10 CPC privity of contract

Naresh Kumar v. Directorate General Border of Security Force & Ors.

02 Jun 2023 · Suresh Kumar Kait; Neena Bansal Krishna · 2023:DHC:4011-DB

The Delhi High Court directed the BSF to decide the petitioner's pending representation for ACP/MACP benefits within eight weeks, emphasizing adherence to judicial precedents but declined to grant the benefits directly.

administrative petition_dismissed Procedural ACP Scheme MACP Scheme Assured Career Progression Modified Assured Career Progression

Sean Dushyant Manchanda & Anr. v. Rabia Manchanda & Ors.

02 Jun 2023 · Prateek Jalan · 2023:DHC:3985

The Delhi High Court rejected the plaint under Order VII Rule 11 CPC on grounds of estoppel by pleading and abuse of process, holding that inconsistent claims in successive suits concerning the same HUF property are impermissible.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant Order VII Rule 11 CPC estoppel by pleading abuse of process Hindu Undivided Family property

Vinod Kumar and Anr. v. State Govt of NCT of Delhi and Anr.

02 Jun 2023 · Dinesh Kumar Sharma · 2023:DHC:4519

The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR and all proceedings under Sections 323, 341, 354(B), and 34 IPC based on a bona fide compromise between parties and the remote possibility of conviction.

criminal appeal_allowed Section 482 CrPC quashing of FIR compromise inherent powers

Parmod Kumar Jain v. State & Ors.

02 Jun 2023 · Dinesh Kumar Sharma · 2023:DHC:4079

The Delhi High Court quashed a trademark infringement FIR under the Trade Marks Act following an amicable settlement between the parties, exercising its inherent jurisdiction under Section 482 Cr.P.C.

criminal petition_allowed Trade Marks Act, 1999 Section 482 Cr.P.C. quashing of FIR trademark infringement

Rajender Aggarwal v. State & Anr.

02 Jun 2023 · Amit Sharma · 2023:DHC:4003
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court granted regular bail to a chartered accountant accused of facilitating a large-scale financial fraud involving diversion of unsecured loans, emphasizing the triple test for bail and balancing liberty with the gravity of socio-economic offences.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant bail economic offences Section 409 IPC corporate loan book

Kavi Arora v. State

02 Jun 2023 · Amit Sharma · 2023:DHC:4004

The Delhi High Court held that bail is not to be denied solely on the gravity of serious economic offences under Section 409 IPC, emphasizing cooperation, parity, and constitutional liberty, and ruled the bail application maintainable despite interim bail status.

criminal other Significant bail economic offences Section 409 IPC corporate loan book

Jagannath Haldar v. Principal Chief Commissioner of Income Tax, International Taxation, New Delhi & Ors.

02 Jun 2023 · Rajiv Shakdher; Girish Kathpalia · 2023:DHC:4251-DB

The Delhi High Court set aside an order under Section 148A(d) of the Income Tax Act for failure to observe natural justice and remanded the matter for fresh consideration after affording a personal hearing.

tax appeal_allowed Significant Income Tax Act 1961 Section 148 Section 148A(d) principles of natural justice

Kishan Lal @ Kartik v. State

02 Jun 2023 · Rajnish Bhatnagar · 2023:DHC:3980

The Delhi High Court dismissed the petitioner's bail application in a murder case, holding that recovery of weapon and eyewitness testimony outweigh hostile witnesses and non-naming in FIR.

criminal appeal_dismissed bail Section 439 Cr.P.C. murder hostile witnesses

The Nainital Bank Officers Association v. Union of India

02 Jun 2023 · Purushaindra Kumar Kaurav · 2023:DHC:4017

Delhi High Court dismissed the petition challenging Bank of Baroda's Expression of Interest for divesting its stake in Nainital Bank, holding that issuing EoI is a policy decision not requiring prior RBI approval and not amenable to judicial interference absent illegality.

administrative petition_dismissed Significant Banking Regulation Act 1949 Section 19(2) Section 53(1) Section 12B

Institute of Chartered Accountants of India v. Competition Commission of India

02 Jun 2023 · Vibhu Bahru · 2023:DHC:4000

The Delhi High Court held that ICAI's CPE program is a statutory regulatory function not subject to Competition Commission's jurisdiction, quashing the investigation order under the Competition Act.

administrative petition_allowed Significant Institute of Chartered Accountants of India Competition Commission of India Continuing Professional Education Section 4 Competition Act

Sanjeev Sikka v. National Faceless Assessment Centre, Delhi

02 Jun 2023 · Rajiv Shakdher; Girish Kathpalia · 2023:DHC:4165-DB

The Delhi High Court set aside and remanded income tax assessment orders passed without affording the petitioner a fair hearing, emphasizing compliance with natural justice principles.

tax appeal_allowed natural justice fair hearing Income Tax Act 1961 Section 147

Rajeev Raj Rathee v. State & Anr.

02 Jun 2023 · Rajnish Bhatnagar · 2023:DHC:3974

The Delhi High Court granted regular bail to the accused in a multi-bank loan fraud case, emphasizing the absence of tampering risk and the documentary nature of evidence.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant bail Section 439 CrPC loan fraud forged documents

Brijesh and Others v. The State and Another

02 Jun 2023 · Dinesh Kumar Sharma · 2023:DHC:4623

The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR involving matrimonial offences under IPC after the parties amicably settled their disputes and obtained a mutual divorce, exercising its inherent powers under Section 482 CrPC.

criminal petition_allowed Significant Section 482 CrPC quashing of FIR matrimonial dispute amicable settlement

Prakash Kumar Dixit v. Ajay Kumar Bhalla & Ors.

02 Jun 2023 · Manmeet Pritam Singh Arora · 2023:DHC:4040

The Delhi High Court held that the petitioner must be reinstated with retrospective penalty and notional promotions as directed earlier, finding respondents guilty of contempt for non-compliance and ordering fresh promotion orders within six weeks.

administrative contempt_found_with_opportunity_to_comply Significant reinstatement minor penalty retrospective penalty notional promotion