Delhi High Court
63,782 judgments
M/S IHT Network Limited v. Sachin Bhardwaj
The Delhi High Court partly allowed the appeal, holding the franchisee entitled to refund and damages for breach of contract within limitation, and dismissed perjury allegations for lack of impact on justice.
Suhail Haj and Umrah Tours v. Union of India
The Delhi High Court stayed the suspension of a Haj Group Organizer's registration and quota to protect pilgrims' constitutional right to undertake Haj pilgrimage while allowing investigation against the organizer to proceed.
Rangesh Srinivasan v. Madhulika Bawa
The Delhi High Court held that the general directions in Rajeev Preenja requiring deposit of entire interim maintenance as a precondition to stay or entertain revision/appeal are not sustainable, and remanded the matter for fresh consideration of stay application on merits.
Benzy Tours and Travels Pvt Ltd. & Anr. v. Union of India
The Delhi High Court stayed the suspension of Haj Group Organizers' registration and quota allocation to protect pilgrims' fundamental right to undertake Haj pilgrimage pending investigation into alleged misrepresentations.
AL AMAL HAJJ UMRA SERVICE v. UNION OF INDIA
Delhi High Court stayed suspension of Haj Group Organizer's registration and quota to protect pilgrims' fundamental right to undertake Haj pilgrimage while allowing investigation to proceed.
AL TAWAF HAJJ AND UMRAH TRAVEL AND TOURISM v. UNION OF INDIA
The Delhi High Court stayed the suspension of a Haj Group Organizer's registration and quota allocation to protect pilgrims' fundamental right to undertake the Haj pilgrimage under Article 25, while allowing investigation to proceed.
Njath Khidmathul Hujjaj v. Union of India
The Delhi High Court stayed the suspension of a Haj Group Organizer's registration and quota allocation to protect pilgrims' constitutional right to undertake Haj pilgrimage pending investigation of alleged misrepresentation.
AL HIDAYA HAJJ SERVICE v. UNION OF INDIA
Delhi High Court stayed suspension of Haj Group Organizer's registration and quota to protect pilgrims' constitutional right to undertake Haj pilgrimage while allowing investigation to proceed.
PKM Travels Yaseen Haj Group v. Union of India
The Delhi High Court stayed the suspension of a Haj Group Organizer's registration and quota to protect pilgrims' fundamental right to undertake Haj pilgrimage under Article 25, while allowing investigation to proceed.
Altima Tours and Travels Pvt Ltd v. Union of India
The Delhi High Court stayed the suspension of a Haj Group Organizer's registration and quota to protect pilgrims' constitutional right to undertake Haj pilgrimage while allowing investigation to proceed.
AL-MABROOK HAJJ GROUP SOCIAL TOURS AND TRAVELS v. UNION OF INDIA
Delhi High Court stayed suspension of Haj Group Organizer's registration and quota to protect pilgrims' constitutional right to undertake Haj pilgrimage while allowing investigation to proceed.
Al Rifai Haj Umra Service v. Union of India
Delhi High Court stayed suspension of Haj Group Organizer's registration and quota to protect pilgrims' fundamental right to undertake Haj pilgrimage while allowing investigation to proceed.
Barakath Hajj Group v. Union of India
Delhi High Court stayed suspension of Haj Group Organizer’s registration and quota to protect pilgrims’ constitutional right to undertake Haj pilgrimage while allowing investigation to proceed.
Delta Tours and Travels v. Union of India
The Delhi High Court stayed the suspension of Haj Group Organizers' registration and quota allocation to protect pilgrims' constitutional right to undertake Haj pilgrimage, pending investigation of alleged misrepresentations.
Akbar Travel and Tours & Anr. v. Union of India
Delhi High Court stayed suspension of Haj Group Organizer's registration and quota to protect pilgrims' constitutional right to undertake Haj pilgrimage pending investigation.
Shah Alam v. State Govt of NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court granted bail to the petitioner accused of kidnapping for ransom, holding that the seriousness of the offence alone does not justify denial of bail absent risk of absconding or tampering with evidence.
Simpal Srivastav v. State
The Delhi High Court granted bail to a young woman accused of kidnapping for ransom, applying the proviso to Section 437(1)(i) CrPC and emphasizing that seriousness of offence alone cannot deny bail.
Mohammad Eshrar Ahmed v. M/S TYSHAZ BUILDMART INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED
The Delhi High Court terminated the mandate of a unilaterally appointed arbitrator due to absence of a valid arbitration agreement and lack of mutual consent under the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.
Gaurav Pundir v. Equestrian Federation of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court directed the Equestrian Federation of India to allow national champion Gaurav Pundir to participate fairly in Asian Games selection trials, holding that sports federations must act fairly and not arbitrarily exclude athletes.
Sher Singh @ Raj Bohara v. State (NCT of Delhi)
The Delhi High Court granted bail to the petitioner accused under the Official Secrets Act and IPC conspiracy charges, emphasizing completion of investigation and absence of naming in the FIR, subject to stringent conditions.