Delhi High Court
31,373 judgments
Mohd. Sajjiad v. Municipal Corporation of Delhi
The Delhi High Court directed the MCD to allow the petitioner street vendor to vend peacefully within the designated zone strictly in accordance with his Certificate of Vending and its terms, protecting him from harassment.
Kusum Sawai v. State & Anr
The Delhi High Court upheld the discharge of the accused under Section 498A IPC, holding that general and vague allegations without specific evidence of dowry-related cruelty do not justify framing of charge.
EMAAR PROPERTIES PJSC v. ADDRESS INFRASTRUCTURES PRIVATE LIMITED
The Delhi High Court disposed of a trademark infringement suit by decreeing it in terms of a lawful and enforceable settlement agreement between the parties.
M/S G.S. EXPRESS PVT. LTD. v. NTPC LTD.
The Delhi High Court held that a contractual clause extinguishing the right to invoke arbitration after six months is void under amended Section 28 of the Indian Contract Act, allowing appointment of an arbitrator despite delayed invocation.
The Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax, Central -3 v. Pawansut Holding Ltd
The Delhi High Court condoned delay in filing income tax appeals and upheld the Tribunal's disposal of protective additions with liberty to the revenue to take further steps if substantive additions are deleted.
Virender Kumar Jain Prop. of M/s Virendra Wires v. Delhi GST Officer, Ward 76 & Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that GST Registration cannot be cancelled retrospectively without proper reasons and hearing, directing cancellation effective from the date of the petitioner's application due to ill health and cessation of business.
Indian Council of Agricultural Research v. Shri Yugal Kishore Sah
The Delhi High Court upheld the Tribunal's interim order restraining promotions under LDCE pending final adjudication of seniority disputes, directing expeditious disposal of the Original Application.
Rohtash & Ors. v. High Court of Delhi
The Delhi High Court suspended the sentence of petitioners convicted under Section 193 IPC during the pendency of their revision petition, exercising judicial discretion considering their age, conduct, and partial sentence served.
M/S ZEAL POLYRUBS PVT LTD v. M/S SPINKS INDIA
The Delhi High Court stayed arrest warrants against a judgment debtor who belatedly filed an affidavit of assets and directed the Executing Court to decide the recall application in execution proceedings under CPC.
Swatch Group India Pvt Ltd v. Union of India
The Delhi High Court held that a show cause notice issued under the Customs Act prior to the 2018 amendment lapsed due to non-adjudication within the prescribed limitation period, and thus cannot be adjudicated.
Abhishek @ Love & Ors. v. The State NCT of Delhi & Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that quashing of FIRs for non-compoundable serious offences under Section 308 IPC is discretionary and cannot be compelled by mediated settlement agreements involving payment of money, while issuing guidelines for mediators and quashing the FIR in the peculiar facts of the case with costs.
Sun Pharma Laboratories Ltd. v. Finecure Pharmaceuticals Ltd. & Ors.
The Delhi High Court granted interlocutory injunction to Sun Pharma restraining Finecure Pharmaceuticals from using the deceptively similar mark PANTOPACID, affirming the prima facie validity of the PANTOCID trademark and recognizing infringement under the Trade Marks Act, 1999.
Lala Ram v. Union of India
The Delhi High Court directed the respondents to treat the petition challenging the MACP scheme OM as a representation and decide it within eight weeks, dismissing the petition without quashing the OM.
Pawanjot Kaur Sawhney v. Bureau of Immigration & Anr.
The Delhi High Court upheld a Look Out Circular and travel restriction against a petitioner involved in a serious economic offence investigation, emphasizing non-cooperation and flight risk as grounds for denying permission to travel abroad.
Akash Singh v. MCD and Ors.
The Delhi High Court allowed a writ petition directing the MCD to permit a street vendor to vend peacefully within his designated zone strictly in accordance with his Certificate of Vending and its terms.
Nitin Kashyap v. Municipal Corporation of Delhi and Ors.
The Delhi High Court directed the MCD to allow the petitioner to vend peacefully at his designated site strictly in accordance with his Certificate of Vending and permitted him to pursue pending representation for modification.
Ankit Pradhan @ Ankit Singh v. State NCT of Delhi and Anr.
The Delhi High Court granted anticipatory bail to the petitioner accused of rape, emphasizing inconsistent victim statements and cooperation with investigation while imposing conditions to protect the victim and ensure trial integrity.
Chandrakant Jha v. State of NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court granted 90-day parole to a multiple murder convict based on his satisfactory conduct, long custody period, and family responsibilities, emphasizing parole as a rehabilitative tool under judicial supervision.
Ravinder Singh v. Union of India
The Delhi High Court declined to interfere with interim orders of the Central Administrative Tribunal regarding promotions and directed the Tribunal to expeditiously decide the pending Original Applications.
Sandip Sen v. Bobby Sen
The Delhi High Court recorded a comprehensive settlement between estranged spouses in matrimonial disputes and allowed withdrawal of pending appeals, emphasizing the binding nature of such settlements.