Delhi High Court
94,045 judgments
Sachin Arora v. State Govt. NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court granted bail to the accused in an NDPS case, holding that non-compliance with mandatory Section 50 notice during search of an article carried by the accused prima facie vitiates recovery, and prolonged incarceration without timely trial justifies bail despite statutory restrictions.
Union of India v. Kendriya Bhandhar
The Delhi High Court allowed correction of a typographical error in the names of counsel in its judgment dated 11.07.2023 by issuing a corrigendum reflecting the correct appearances.
M/S United Sanitations v. Addl Commissioner of Customs
The Delhi High Court held that brass sanitary fittings exported by the petitioner are correctly classifiable under Chapter 74 of the Customs Tariff Act, entitling them to higher duty drawback, and quashed the revision order upholding classification under Chapter 84.
Hero Motocorp Limited v. Shree Amba Industries
The Delhi High Court held that the plaintiff's registered design for a motorcycle front fender was neither new nor original due to prior publication and that the fender, being a replacement part without independent commercial existence, is not registrable under the Designs Act, dismissing the plaintiff's interim injunction application.
Anil Kumar v. MCD and Ors.
The Delhi High Court directed the MCD to allow the petitioner to vend peacefully within the designated zone strictly as per his Certificate of Vending, while permitting him to pursue his classification representation before the competent authority.
Dr. Reddys Laboratories Limited v. Fast Cure Pharma
The Delhi High Court granted permanent injunction against the defendant for trademark infringement and passing off by using the deceptively similar mark "RAZOFAST" on identical pharmaceutical products.
Rakesh Kumar v. MCD and Ors.
The Delhi High Court directed the MCD to allow the petitioner to vend peacefully within his designated zone under the Certificate of Vending, subject to its terms, and restrained harassment by officials.
State v. Haripal
The Delhi High Court set aside trial court orders directing procurement of call detail records of police officials and secret informers in NDPS cases, holding such orders violate privacy and risk safety without sufficient justification.
Imran v. State
The Delhi High Court granted bail to the accused in a murder case, holding that at the bail stage, only prima facie assessment is required and detailed evidence appreciation is deferred to trial.
Mohammad Irfan v. Municipal Corporation of India and Ors.
The Delhi High Court directed the MCD to allow the petitioner to vend peacefully within the designated zone strictly in accordance with the terms of his Certificate of Vending under the Street Vendors Act, 2014.
GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI v. M/S UNITED BUILDERS
The Delhi High Court dismissed the appeal and refused to condone a 528-day delay by a government department in filing the appeal, holding that no sufficient cause was shown and emphasizing the obligation of government bodies to act diligently.
Harish Parmar v. Govt. of NCT of Delhi and Anr
The High Court set aside the Tribunal's dismissal of a disciplinary challenge for failure to consider specific pleas and directed a fresh hearing with a reasoned order, reaffirming the limited scope of judicial review in disciplinary matters.
Mohd. Sajjiad v. Municipal Corporation of Delhi
The Delhi High Court directed the MCD to allow the petitioner street vendor to vend peacefully within the designated zone strictly in accordance with his Certificate of Vending and its terms, protecting him from harassment.
Kusum Sawai v. State & Anr
The Delhi High Court upheld the discharge of the accused under Section 498A IPC, holding that general and vague allegations without specific evidence of dowry-related cruelty do not justify framing of charge.
EMAAR PROPERTIES PJSC v. ADDRESS INFRASTRUCTURES PRIVATE LIMITED
The Delhi High Court disposed of a trademark infringement suit by decreeing it in terms of a lawful and enforceable settlement agreement between the parties.
M/S G.S. EXPRESS PVT. LTD. v. NTPC LTD.
The Delhi High Court held that a contractual clause extinguishing the right to invoke arbitration after six months is void under amended Section 28 of the Indian Contract Act, allowing appointment of an arbitrator despite delayed invocation.
The Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax, Central -3 v. Pawansut Holding Ltd
The Delhi High Court condoned delay in filing income tax appeals and upheld the Tribunal's disposal of protective additions with liberty to the revenue to take further steps if substantive additions are deleted.
Virender Kumar Jain Prop. of M/s Virendra Wires v. Delhi GST Officer, Ward 76 & Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that GST Registration cannot be cancelled retrospectively without proper reasons and hearing, directing cancellation effective from the date of the petitioner's application due to ill health and cessation of business.
Indian Council of Agricultural Research v. Shri Yugal Kishore Sah
The Delhi High Court upheld the Tribunal's interim order restraining promotions under LDCE pending final adjudication of seniority disputes, directing expeditious disposal of the Original Application.
Rohtash & Ors. v. High Court of Delhi
The Delhi High Court suspended the sentence of petitioners convicted under Section 193 IPC during the pendency of their revision petition, exercising judicial discretion considering their age, conduct, and partial sentence served.