Delhi High Court
94,045 judgments
M/S ZEAL POLYRUBS PVT LTD v. M/S SPINKS INDIA
The Delhi High Court stayed arrest warrants against a judgment debtor who belatedly filed an affidavit of assets and directed the Executing Court to decide the recall application in execution proceedings under CPC.
Swatch Group India Pvt Ltd v. Union of India
The Delhi High Court held that a show cause notice issued under the Customs Act prior to the 2018 amendment lapsed due to non-adjudication within the prescribed limitation period, and thus cannot be adjudicated.
Abhishek @ Love & Ors. v. The State NCT of Delhi & Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that quashing of FIRs for non-compoundable serious offences under Section 308 IPC is discretionary and cannot be compelled by mediated settlement agreements involving payment of money, while issuing guidelines for mediators and quashing the FIR in the peculiar facts of the case with costs.
Sun Pharma Laboratories Ltd. v. Finecure Pharmaceuticals Ltd. & Ors.
The Delhi High Court granted interlocutory injunction to Sun Pharma restraining Finecure Pharmaceuticals from using the deceptively similar mark PANTOPACID, affirming the prima facie validity of the PANTOCID trademark and recognizing infringement under the Trade Marks Act, 1999.
Lala Ram v. Union of India
The Delhi High Court directed the respondents to treat the petition challenging the MACP scheme OM as a representation and decide it within eight weeks, dismissing the petition without quashing the OM.
Pawanjot Kaur Sawhney v. Bureau of Immigration & Anr.
The Delhi High Court upheld a Look Out Circular and travel restriction against a petitioner involved in a serious economic offence investigation, emphasizing non-cooperation and flight risk as grounds for denying permission to travel abroad.
Akash Singh v. MCD and Ors.
The Delhi High Court allowed a writ petition directing the MCD to permit a street vendor to vend peacefully within his designated zone strictly in accordance with his Certificate of Vending and its terms.
Nitin Kashyap v. Municipal Corporation of Delhi and Ors.
The Delhi High Court directed the MCD to allow the petitioner to vend peacefully at his designated site strictly in accordance with his Certificate of Vending and permitted him to pursue pending representation for modification.
Ankit Pradhan @ Ankit Singh v. State NCT of Delhi and Anr.
The Delhi High Court granted anticipatory bail to the petitioner accused of rape, emphasizing inconsistent victim statements and cooperation with investigation while imposing conditions to protect the victim and ensure trial integrity.
Chandrakant Jha v. State of NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court granted 90-day parole to a multiple murder convict based on his satisfactory conduct, long custody period, and family responsibilities, emphasizing parole as a rehabilitative tool under judicial supervision.
Ravinder Singh v. Union of India
The Delhi High Court declined to interfere with interim orders of the Central Administrative Tribunal regarding promotions and directed the Tribunal to expeditiously decide the pending Original Applications.
Sandip Sen v. Bobby Sen
The Delhi High Court recorded a comprehensive settlement between estranged spouses in matrimonial disputes and allowed withdrawal of pending appeals, emphasizing the binding nature of such settlements.
Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax -1, Chandigarh v. M/S Kuantum Papers Ltd.
The Delhi High Court upheld the allowance of depreciation on a chemical recovery plant and brand names as intangible assets under Section 32(1)(ii) of the Income Tax Act, dismissing the revenue's appeal.
Mohd Firoj and Ors. v. Municipal Corporation of Delhi
The Delhi High Court directed the Municipal Corporation of Delhi to allow street vendors to vend peacefully in accordance with their vending certificates, emphasizing compliance with certificate terms and statutory procedures for grievances.
TATA AIG GENERAL INSURANCE CO LTD v. SARITA & ORS
The Delhi High Court upheld the insurer's liability to pay compensation despite a fake previous policy and affirmed that a married daughter is entitled to loss of estate compensation under Section 166 of the Motor Vehicles Act.
Dabur India Limited v. Ashok Kumar and Ors.
The Delhi High Court directed compliance and further proceedings in multiple trademark infringement suits involving domain name registrars and emphasized enforcement of blocking orders against infringing domain names.
Union of India v. Kartari Devi Dec. Thr Lrs & Anr
The Delhi High Court dismissed the Union of India's petition challenging an execution order for payment of land acquisition compensation but granted a four-week extension to deposit the decretal amount before property attachment proceeds.
Shyam Ranchhod Lal Ganatra & Ors. v. IIFL Home Finance Limited
The Delhi High Court held that unilateral appointment of a sole arbitrator by one party is unsustainable and terminated the arbitrator's mandate, directing appointment through DIAC to ensure impartial arbitration.
Yogita Relhan v. Karan Taneja
The Delhi High Court held that a consent order for interim maintenance cannot be recalled or refunded on grounds of alleged concealment without proper pleading of fraud, and set aside the Family Court's order directing refund.
Madhu Sharma v. Sadhna Sharma @Sudha
The Delhi High Court modified a trial court order to allow interim access for repairs without granting disputed duplicate keys, deleted an unnecessary party, and encouraged mediation in a family property dispute.