Commissioner of Income Tax (International Taxation)-2 v. Intelsat US LLC

Delhi High Court · 17 Aug 2023 · 2023:DHC:6022-DB
Rajiv Shakdher; Girish Kathpalia
ITA 455/2023
2023:DHC:6022-DB
tax appeal_dismissed Procedural

AI Summary

The Delhi High Court dismissed the tax appeal concerning satellite transponder service payments for AY 2019-20, following coordinate bench precedents and pending Supreme Court petitions.

Full Text
Translation output
ITA 455/2023
HIGH COURT OF DELHI
Decision delivered on: 17.08.2023
ITA 455/2023
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (INTERNATIONAL TAXATION)-2 ..... Appellant
Through: Mr Sanjay Kumar, Sr. Standing Counsel with Ms Hemlata Rawat and
Ms Easha, Advs.
VERSUS
INTELSAT US LLC ..... Respondent
Through: Mr S.S. Tomar with Mr Ankit Sahani, Advs.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SHAKDHER
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GIRISH KATHPALIA [Physical Hearing/Hybrid Hearing (as per request)]
RAJIV SHAKDHER, J. (ORAL):
JUDGMENT

1. This appeal concerns Assessment Year (AY) 2019-20.

2. Via this appeal, the appellant/revenue seeks to assail the order dated 31.01.2023 passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal [in short, “Tribunal”].

3. Mr Sanjay Kumar, learned senior standing counsel, who appears on behalf of appellant/revenue, fairly informs us that the issue raised in the present appeal is covered by the decision of this Court dated 24.07.2023 rendered in ITA No. 395/2023, titled Commissioner of Income Tax (International Taxation)-2 vs. Intelsat US LLC (Erstwhile Intelsat Corporation).

4. The said decision concerns AY 2018-19. While disposing the appeal, ITA 455/2023 we had made the following observations: -

“7. Broadly, the appeal concerns the additions made by the assessing officer vis-à-vis payment received for rendering satellite transponder facilities by the respondent/assessee to its customers in India. 8. We are told by Mr Sanjay Kumar, learned senior standing counsel, who appears on behalf of the appellant/revenue, that the issue raised in the present appeal is covered by the decisions rendered by the coordinate benches in M/s Asia Satellite Telecommunications Co. Ltd. v. DIT (2011) 322 ITR 340 (Del) and Director of International Taxation v. New Skies Satellite BV (2016) 382 ITR 114 (Del). 9. We are told that the appellant/revenue has preferred Special Leave Petition(s) against the said decisions, which are pending adjudication. 10. Accordingly, the appeal of the appellant/revenue is closed, following the abovementioned decisions rendered by the coordinate benches”.

5. Accordingly, in this case as well, the appeal is closed.

6. In case, the appellant/revenue were to succeed in their appeals pending in matters of M/s Asia Satellite Telecommunications Co. Ltd. v. DIT (2011) 322 ITR 340 (Del) and Director of International Taxation v. New Skies Satellite BV (2016) 382 ITR 114 (Del), parties will be bound by the decision rendered in said Special Leave Petitions.

RAJIV SHAKDHER JUDGE GIRISH KATHPALIA, J JUDGE AUGUST 17, 2023 Click here to check corrigendum, if any