Delhi High Court

33,049 judgments

Year:

The Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax -6 v. Mentor Graphics (India) Pvt. Ltd.

05 Sep 2023 · Rajiv Shakdher; Girish Kathpalia · 2023:DHC:6945-DB

The Delhi High Court dismissed the revenue's appeal challenging the Tribunal's exclusion of certain comparables in transfer pricing for AY 2008-09, holding that the Tribunal's factual findings are final and no substantial question of law arises.

tax appeal_dismissed transfer pricing comparables Income Tax Appellate Tribunal segmental data

Surestha v. State (NCT of Delhi)

05 Sep 2023 · Dinesh Kumar Sharma · 2023:DHC:6689

The Delhi High Court disposed of the anticipatory bail application in a case involving assault on a minor, directing the petitioner to cooperate with investigation and allowing arrest only after four weeks’ notice.

criminal other anticipatory bail Section 438 CrPC POCSO Act juvenile justice

M/S Topline Buildtech Pvt. Ltd & Others v. State and Another

05 Sep 2023 · Sudhir Kumar Jain · 2023:DHC:6661
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court upheld the summoning order under Section 138 NI Act, holding that alleged theft and invalidity of cheques are defenses to be examined at trial, not at the cognizance stage.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant Section 138 Negotiable Instruments Act summoning order stolen cheque stop payment instruction

Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax-7 v. Pepsico India Holding Pvt. Ltd.

05 Sep 2023 · Rajiv Shakdher; Girish Kathpalia · 2023:DHC:6933-DB

The Delhi High Court held that provident fund deposits made on the next working day following a national holiday due date qualify for deduction under the Income Tax Act, but deposits beyond the due date cannot be claimed merely because they precede filing of the return.

tax appeal_closed_with_mixed_decision Significant Income Tax Act 1961 Section 36(1)(5)(A) Provident Fund deduction due date

M/S Topline Buildtech Pvt. Ltd & Others v. State and Another

05 Sep 2023 · Sudhir Kumar Jain · 2023:DHC:6662
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court upheld the summoning order under Section 138 NI Act, holding that defenses regarding stolen cheque and stop payment cannot be adjudicated at the summoning stage and must be raised during trial.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant Section 138 Negotiable Instruments Act Summoning order Cheque dishonour Payment stopped by drawer

Sh. Mukesh Pal & Anr. v. The State (NCT of Delhi) & Anr.

05 Sep 2023 · Dinesh Kumar Sharma · 2023:DHC:7068

The Delhi High Court quashed a criminal FIR under multiple IPC sections based on an amicable settlement between parties, exercising its inherent jurisdiction under Section 482 CrPC.

criminal petition_allowed Section 482 CrPC quashing of FIR amicable settlement mediation

Haldiram India Pvt Ltd v. S K Foods and Beverages

05 Sep 2023 · C. Hari Shankar · 2023:DHC:6646

The Delhi High Court dismissed the defendant's frivolous application under Section 340 Cr.P.C. alleging fabrication by the plaintiff in civil proceedings, holding that misuse of criminal provisions in civil disputes is an abuse of process.

civil petition_dismissed Significant Section 340 Cr.P.C. fabrication of evidence Order XXXIX Rule 2A CPC abuse of process

M/S G.D. GOENKA PVT. LTD. v. SHRI TIKAM CHAND EDUCATIONAL AND CHARITABLE TRUST & ANR.

05 Sep 2023 · Jyoti Singh · 2023:DHC:6810

The Delhi High Court appointed an independent sole arbitrator under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 to adjudicate disputes arising from a MoU, without expressing any opinion on the merits.

civil appeal_allowed Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Section 11(6) Section 12(1) appointment of arbitrator

Gateway Impex Pvt Ltd v. Tata AIG Life Insurance Co Ltd

05 Sep 2023 · Rajiv Shakdher; Tara Vitasta Ganju · 2023:DHC:6462
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court upheld an arbitral award awarding mesne profits at a reasonable rate, refusing to enforce an exorbitant penal rent clause, holding no patent illegality in the Tribunal's contract interpretation.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant Arbitral Award Patent illegality Liquidated damages Mesne profits

Glaxo Group Limited and Anr. v. Manoj Kumar Jain and Ors.

05 Sep 2023 · Prathiba M. Singh · 2023:DHC:6479

The Delhi High Court recorded a settlement in a trademark infringement suit and declared the mark BETNESOL as a well-known mark under the Trade Marks Act, 1999, restraining defendants from using deceptively similar marks.

civil appeal_allowed Significant trademark infringement passing off well-known mark Trade Marks Act 1999

Kulwant Singh Hazooria v. Harcharan Singh Hazooria

05 Sep 2023 · Suresh Kumar Kait; Neena Bansal Krishna · 2023:DHC:6383-DB
Cites 0 · Cited by 1

The Delhi High Court upheld the trial court's decree setting aside two Gift Deeds executed under undue influence by an elderly donor in a fiduciary relationship, ordering partition of the property as per the earlier Will.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant Gift Deed Undue Influence Fiduciary Relationship Partition Suit

Jai Pal v. Union of India and Ors.

05 Sep 2023 · Sanjeev Sachdeva; Manoj Jain · 2023:DHC:6569-DB

The Delhi High Court held that the petitioner is entitled to 3rd MACP from 31.12.2012 applying the correct APAR benchmark and directed the respondents to grant benefits accordingly.

service_law petition_allowed Significant 3rd MACP Modified Assured Career Progression Annual Performance Assessment Report APAR benchmark

National Restaurant Association of India & Ors. v. Union of India & Anr.

05 Sep 2023 · Prathiba M. Singh · 2023:DHC:6490

The Delhi High Court upheld the CCPA's authority to regulate mandatory service charges by hotels and restaurants, directing interim measures to ensure transparency and prevent consumer confusion.

administrative other Significant Central Consumer Protection Authority Service Charge Hotels and Restaurants Consumer Protection

Vishwakant Singh & Anr. v. Sunita Mittal

05 Sep 2023 · Manmeet Pritam Singh Arora · 2023:DHC:6539

The High Court set aside the Trial Court’s order closing evidence for non-appearance and allowed the petitioner to complete evidence subject to costs and conditions, as final judgment was not yet pronounced.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Article 227 Constitution of India Order VII Rule 14 CPC recall of order closing of evidence

M/S TATA IRON & STEEL CO. LTD. v. M/S JHALANI TOOLS INDIA LTD

05 Sep 2023 · Prathiba M. Singh · 2023:DHC:6500

The Delhi High Court directed the Official Liquidator and EPFO to promptly settle and transparently disburse workmen dues in liquidation proceedings, allowing court fee exemptions during the COVID-19 pandemic subject to payment.

labor other Significant Official Liquidator Employees' Provident Fund Organisation workmen dues disbursement

Satender Kumar Paswan & Anr. v. Delhi Subordinate Services Selection Board and Anr.

05 Sep 2023 · V. Kameswar Rao; Anoop Kumar Mendiratta · 2023:DHC:6453-DB

The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition alleging wilful violation of a Tribunal order directing appointment under Scheduled Caste category, holding that the respondents acted in accordance with the law prevailing at the time and that the later judgment has only prospective effect.

administrative petition_dismissed Significant Contempt Petition Scheduled Caste certificate Appointment eligibility Prospective effect

Defsys Solutions Private Limited v. Union of India

05 Sep 2023 · Prathiba M. Singh · 2023:DHC:6463
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court held that suspension of business dealings under Ministry of Defence Guidelines requires adherence to natural justice principles and cannot be indefinite or arbitrary, even in national security cases.

administrative petition_allowed Significant suspension of business dealings Ministry of Defence Guidelines natural justice national security

EMAAR PROPERTIES PJSC v. EMAARESSE OPC PRIVATE LIMITED

05 Sep 2023 · C. Hari Shankar · 2023:DHC:6465

The Delhi High Court disposed of a trademark infringement suit by decreeing it in terms of a court-mediated settlement agreement binding the parties to cease use of disputed marks and change the defendant's corporate name.

civil settled settlement agreement trademark infringement mediation court decree

Ambuj Hotel and Real Estate Pvt Ltd v. Ministry of Railways & Anr.

05 Sep 2023 · Jyoti Singh · 2023:DHC:6507

The Delhi High Court directed the respondents to provide the petitioner with copies of complaints and decide pending representations with due procedural fairness before taking any coercive action regarding the onboard catering license.

civil petition_dismissed Procedural onboard catering services license fee COVID-19 pandemic show-cause notice

Om Prakash Jaiswal & Ors. v. Manish Kumar & Ors.

05 Sep 2023 · Navin Chawla · 2023:DHC:6350

The High Court held that a person in actual possession and control of a vehicle under a hire or lease agreement is jointly liable with the registered owner for motor accident compensation and set aside the deletion of such party from the claim petition at the preliminary stage.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 owner liability hire and lease motor accident claim