Full Text
HIGH COURT OF DELHI
Decision delivered on: 05.09.2023
M/S. AERO CLUB ..... Appellant
Through: Mr Ashesh Jain with Mr Abhijit Mittal, Mr Gaurav Kumar and Ms
Shaivya Singh, Advs.
Through: Mr Shailendra Singh, Sr. Standing Counsel with Ms Dacchita Shahi and
Ms Anuja Pethia, Jr. Standing Counsels.
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GIRISH KATHPALIA [Physical Hearing/Hybrid Hearing (as per request)]
RAJIV SHAKDHER, J. (ORAL):
JUDGMENT
1. We have heard the learned counsel for the parties.
2. According to us, the appeal requires to be admitted qua one issue which, according to us, arises for consideration.
3. Resultantly, the appeal is admitted, and the following question of law is framed for consideration by the Court.
(i) Whether the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal [in short, “Tribunal”] misdirected itself on facts and in law in failing to notice that Rs. 44,28,453/-, the amount payable towards the provident fund and Rs. 72,131/-, the amount payable towards the ESI, fell due on a National Holiday i.e., 15.08.2018 and therefore the deposit made on the following date i.e., 16.08.2018 was amenable to deduction?
4. We had the occasion to deal with a similar question of law in ITA NO. 12/2023, titled Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax-7 vs Pepsico India Holding Pvt. Ltd. The observations made by us therein, being apposite, are extracted hereafter:
5. In view of what is stated hereinabove, the question of law, as framed, is answered in favour of the appellant/assessee and against the respondent/revenue.
6. Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed in the aforesaid terms.
RAJIV SHAKDHER JUDGE GIRISH KATHPALIA JUDGE SEPTEMBER 5, 2023 Click here to check corrigendum, if any