Delhi High Court
93,877 judgments
Kamla Devi v. Dropati Devi Legal Heirs
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition challenging the refusal to condone delay in filing an appeal against dismissal of an application to set aside an ex-parte decree, holding that the petitioner deliberately avoided service and failed to prosecute with due diligence, thus disentitling her from relief under Section 14 of the Limitation Act.
Trishla Jain v. Babulal Gupta & Ors.
The Delhi High Court allowed condonation of delay in filing the written statement in a civil possession suit, emphasizing adjudication on merits and imposing costs as a condition.
Sabita Jain v. DDA and Anr
The Delhi High Court dismissed the writ petition challenging DDA's rejection of the highest bid for an industrial plot, holding that the authority was justified in cancelling the auction as the bid did not reflect the true market value.
Reliance Industries Limited & Anr. v. AJIO Online Shopping Pvt Ltd and Ors.
The Delhi High Court granted ex-parte injunction and directed freezing of bank accounts and blocking of mobile numbers to restrain fraudulent use of the 'AJIO' trademark and ordered police investigation into the scam.
Manju Singal Proprietor Singla Food Products v. Deepak Kumar
The Delhi High Court allowed the petition to expunge a wrongful copyright registration granted for a non-original artistic work that was a substantial imitation of the petitioner’s earlier registered work under Section 50 of the Copyright Act, 1957.
Commissioner of Central Tax v. M/S SingTel Global India Pvt Ltd
The Delhi High Court upheld that SingTel Global India Pvt. Ltd. is not an intermediary and is entitled to refund of unutilized input service credit for exported telecommunication services under the Service Tax Rules.
Kavita Tyagi v. Sunil Kumar Tyagi
The Delhi High Court dismissed the wife's appeal and upheld the Family Court's grant of divorce to the husband on the ground of mental cruelty under Section 13(1)(ia) of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955, considering the cumulative conduct and long separation.
Promoshirt SM SA v. Armasuisse and Another
The Delhi High Court held that Section 100-A of the CPC bars Letters Patent Appeals against Single Judge appellate orders under the Trade Marks Act, 1999, dismissing the appeals as not maintainable.
Retail Royalty Company & Anr. v. Santosh Kumar Sharma Trading as Shiv Shakti Creations
The Delhi High Court granted permanent injunctions against the defendant for trademark infringement of the well-known AMERICAN EAGLE marks, with costs awarded to the plaintiffs and the defendant agreeing to cease use of the marks.
M K Hamied & Anr. v. State through Sundeep B J Drug Inspector
The Delhi High Court quashed the prosecution against Cipla Ltd. executives for non-compliance with mandatory sample and report supply provisions under the Drugs and Cosmetics Act, emphasizing the manufacturer's right to challenge analyst reports.
APHV India Investco Private Limited v. Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax Circle Int Tax 1 (1)(1), Delhi & Anr.
The Delhi High Court set aside income tax assessment and penalty orders for violation of natural justice and insufficient response time, remanding the matter for fresh proceedings with a fair hearing.
Aman Gupta v. State
Anticipatory bail was denied to the petitioner accused of forgery and GST evasion involving fake firms, as custodial interrogation was necessary and the petitioner abused court process.
Jai Narayan v. State
The High Court acquitted the appellant in a corruption case, holding that the prosecution failed to prove the essential ingredient of demand and acceptance of illegal gratification under Section 7 of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988.
Iffco Tokio General Insurance Co Ltd v. Sunita Rani & Ors.
The Delhi High Court upheld the motor accident claim award attributing 40% contributory negligence to the deceased, dismissed the insurer's appeal, and enhanced the loss of consortium compensation for the claimants.
Policybazaar Insurance Web Aggregator & Anr. v. Coverfox Insurance Broking Pvt. Ltd. & Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that use of registered trademarks as keywords in Google AdWords constitutes 'use' under the Trade Marks Act but without actual confusion or deception, such use does not amount to infringement, dismissing plaintiffs' interim relief applications.
M K Hamied & Anr. v. State through Abhijit Ghosh
The Delhi High Court quashed prosecution against Cipla Ltd. executives for non-compliance with mandatory procedural safeguards under the Drugs and Cosmetics Act, emphasizing the necessity of supplying samples and reports to manufacturers and judicial scrutiny before summoning.
M K Hameid & Anr. v. State through K T Raghu Kumar Drugs Inspector
The Delhi High Court quashed prosecution against Cipla Ltd. executives for non-compliance with mandatory sample and report procedures under the Drugs and Cosmetics Act and failure to establish a prima facie case.
M K Hamied & Anr. v. State through Sundeep B J Drugs Inspector
The Delhi High Court quashed prosecution against Cipla directors for non-compliance with mandatory drug sampling and reporting procedures under the Drugs and Cosmetics Act, emphasizing procedural safeguards and the necessity of judicial inquiry before summoning.
M K Hameid & Anr. v. State through Abhijit Singh
The Delhi High Court quashed prosecution against Cipla Ltd. executives for non-compliance with mandatory sample and report supply provisions under the Drugs and Cosmetics Act and failure of the Magistrate to apply judicial mind before summoning.
The Trustees of Princeton University v. The Vagdevi Educational Society & Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that the defendants' prior continuous use of the mark "PRINCETON" since 1991 entitles them to protection under Section 34 of the Trade Marks Act, 1999, dismissing the plaintiff's claim for injunction despite trademark infringement.